负渗漏:森林管理制度的关键作用

IF 0.7 4区农林科学 Q3 ECONOMICS

Journal of Forest Economics Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jfe.2018.09.001

Jorge H. García , Anton Orlov , Asbjørn Aaheim

{"title":"负渗漏:森林管理制度的关键作用","authors":"Jorge H. García , Anton Orlov , Asbjørn Aaheim","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2018.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A model of two regions with a common wood market is introduced. Regions may be of two types, according to their forest management regime, namely managed forest plantations<span> (M) and unmanaged open access forests (U). It is found that when regions are of the same type, unilateral climate policy in the forestry<span> sector leads to (positive) carbon leakage. However, when regions are of different types, unilateral climate policy results in negative carbon leakage. Thus, policies aimed at increasing diversity in management regimes, within a wood market, stimulate the emergence of market forces that preserve and enhance forest carbon.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest Economics","volume":"33 ","pages":"Pages 8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jfe.2018.09.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negative leakage: The key role of forest management regimes\",\"authors\":\"Jorge H. García , Anton Orlov , Asbjørn Aaheim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfe.2018.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A model of two regions with a common wood market is introduced. Regions may be of two types, according to their forest management regime, namely managed forest plantations<span> (M) and unmanaged open access forests (U). It is found that when regions are of the same type, unilateral climate policy in the forestry<span> sector leads to (positive) carbon leakage. However, when regions are of different types, unilateral climate policy results in negative carbon leakage. Thus, policies aimed at increasing diversity in management regimes, within a wood market, stimulate the emergence of market forces that preserve and enhance forest carbon.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forest Economics\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 8-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jfe.2018.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forest Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1104689917300375\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1104689917300375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

介绍了一个具有共同木材市场的两个地区的模型。根据其森林管理制度，区域可能分为两种类型，即有管理的人工林(M)和未管理的开放通道林(U)。研究发现，当区域为同一类型时，林业部门的单边气候政策导致(正)碳泄漏。然而，当区域类型不同时，单边气候政策导致负碳泄漏。因此，旨在在木材市场内增加管理制度多样性的政策刺激了保存和增加森林碳的市场力量的出现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Negative leakage: The key role of forest management regimes

A model of two regions with a common wood market is introduced. Regions may be of two types, according to their forest management regime, namely managed forest plantations (M) and unmanaged open access forests (U). It is found that when regions are of the same type, unilateral climate policy in the forestry sector leads to (positive) carbon leakage. However, when regions are of different types, unilateral climate policy results in negative carbon leakage. Thus, policies aimed at increasing diversity in management regimes, within a wood market, stimulate the emergence of market forces that preserve and enhance forest carbon.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Forest Economics 农林科学-林学

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>36 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal covers all aspects of forest economics, and publishes scientific papers in subject areas such as the following: forest management problems: economics of silviculture, forest regulation and operational activities, managerial economics; forest industry analysis: economics of processing, industrial organization problems, demand and supply analysis, technological change, international trade of forest products; multiple use of forests: valuation of non-market priced goods and services, cost-benefit analysis of environment and timber production, external effects of forestry and forest industry; forest policy analysis: market and intervention failures, regulation of forest management, ownership, taxation; land use and economic development: deforestation and land use problem, national resource accounting, contribution to national and regional income and employment. forestry and climate change: using forestry to mitigate climate change, economic analysis of bioenergy, adaption of forestry to climate change.