在欧洲和亚洲多个地点对cobas纯集成解决方案进行性能评估

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
H. Baum, S. Chun, P. Findeisen, Hans Fleurkens, Hyunjung Gu, Jinyoung Hong, Franziska Prévôt, Dawid Radziszewski, M. Rossier, Nico Vogt, J. Furrer, K. Klopprogge, C. Schneider-Thauern
{"title":"在欧洲和亚洲多个地点对cobas纯集成解决方案进行性能评估","authors":"H. Baum, S. Chun, P. Findeisen, Hans Fleurkens, Hyunjung Gu, Jinyoung Hong, Franziska Prévôt, Dawid Radziszewski, M. Rossier, Nico Vogt, J. Furrer, K. Klopprogge, C. Schneider-Thauern","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2022-0137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives We evaluated analytical performance, functionality, reliability, and comparability of cobas® pure integrated solutions (Roche Diagnostics) under routine-like conditions. Methods The study was conducted in Europe and Asia (five sites). Seventy-six applications covering ion selective electrolytes (ISE), clinical chemistry (CC), and immunochemistry (IC) analytes were assessed using Elecsys® immunochemistry assays (Roche Diagnostics). Samples included control material and pseudonymized residual samples (plasma/serum/urine). Analytical performance, functionality, and system reliability were evaluated. An inter-laboratory survey, routine simulation imprecision (RSI) and method comparison experiments, and dedicated workflow runs were conducted. Results Most coefficients of variation (CVs) for repeatability were <1 % for ISE, ≤2 % for CC, and <2.5 % for IC assays; for intermediate precision were ≤2 % for ISE and CC, and <2.5 % for IC assays; and for reproducibility were ≤3 % for ISE and CC, and <2.5 % for IC assays. Most RSI reference (94 %) and random part (93 %) CVs were ≤2 %; 99 % of runs completed without system-related interruption. 218 method comparisons generated median Passing–Bablok slope of 1.00, median bias at the medical decision point of −0.1 %, and median Pearson’s r of 0.998. Conclusions cobas pure integrated solutions demonstrated precise and accurate results under routine-like conditions and comparable results vs. commercial analyzers, supporting implementation into routine practice.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of cobas pure integrated solutions at multiple sites in Europe and Asia\",\"authors\":\"H. Baum, S. Chun, P. Findeisen, Hans Fleurkens, Hyunjung Gu, Jinyoung Hong, Franziska Prévôt, Dawid Radziszewski, M. Rossier, Nico Vogt, J. Furrer, K. Klopprogge, C. Schneider-Thauern\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2022-0137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives We evaluated analytical performance, functionality, reliability, and comparability of cobas® pure integrated solutions (Roche Diagnostics) under routine-like conditions. Methods The study was conducted in Europe and Asia (five sites). Seventy-six applications covering ion selective electrolytes (ISE), clinical chemistry (CC), and immunochemistry (IC) analytes were assessed using Elecsys® immunochemistry assays (Roche Diagnostics). Samples included control material and pseudonymized residual samples (plasma/serum/urine). Analytical performance, functionality, and system reliability were evaluated. An inter-laboratory survey, routine simulation imprecision (RSI) and method comparison experiments, and dedicated workflow runs were conducted. Results Most coefficients of variation (CVs) for repeatability were <1 % for ISE, ≤2 % for CC, and <2.5 % for IC assays; for intermediate precision were ≤2 % for ISE and CC, and <2.5 % for IC assays; and for reproducibility were ≤3 % for ISE and CC, and <2.5 % for IC assays. Most RSI reference (94 %) and random part (93 %) CVs were ≤2 %; 99 % of runs completed without system-related interruption. 218 method comparisons generated median Passing–Bablok slope of 1.00, median bias at the medical decision point of −0.1 %, and median Pearson’s r of 0.998. Conclusions cobas pure integrated solutions demonstrated precise and accurate results under routine-like conditions and comparable results vs. commercial analyzers, supporting implementation into routine practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2022-0137\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2022-0137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的我们评估了cobas®纯集成解决方案(罗氏诊断)在常规条件下的分析性能、功能、可靠性和可比性。方法该研究在欧洲和亚洲(5个地点)进行。使用Elecsys®免疫化学分析(罗氏诊断)评估了76种应用,包括离子选择性电解质(ISE)、临床化学(CC)和免疫化学(IC)分析物。样本包括对照材料和化名残留样本(血浆/血清/尿液)。对分析性能、功能和系统可靠性进行了评估。进行了实验室间调查、常规模拟不精确性(RSI)和方法比较实验,以及专门的工作流程运行。结果大多数重复性变异系数(CV)<1 % 对于ISE,≤2 % 对于CC,且<2.5 % 用于IC测定;中间精度≤2 % ISE和CC,且<2.5 % 用于IC测定;和再现性≤3 % ISE和CC,且<2.5 % 用于IC测定。大多数RSI参考(94 %) 和随机部分(93 %) CV≤2 %; 99 % 在没有系统相关中断的情况下完成的运行数。218种方法比较产生的Passing–Bablok斜率中值为1.00,医疗决策点的中值偏差为-0.1 %, Pearson的中位数r为0.998。结论cobas纯集成解决方案在类似常规条件下显示了精确和准确的结果,与商业分析仪相比,结果具有可比性,支持在常规实践中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of cobas pure integrated solutions at multiple sites in Europe and Asia
Abstract Objectives We evaluated analytical performance, functionality, reliability, and comparability of cobas® pure integrated solutions (Roche Diagnostics) under routine-like conditions. Methods The study was conducted in Europe and Asia (five sites). Seventy-six applications covering ion selective electrolytes (ISE), clinical chemistry (CC), and immunochemistry (IC) analytes were assessed using Elecsys® immunochemistry assays (Roche Diagnostics). Samples included control material and pseudonymized residual samples (plasma/serum/urine). Analytical performance, functionality, and system reliability were evaluated. An inter-laboratory survey, routine simulation imprecision (RSI) and method comparison experiments, and dedicated workflow runs were conducted. Results Most coefficients of variation (CVs) for repeatability were <1 % for ISE, ≤2 % for CC, and <2.5 % for IC assays; for intermediate precision were ≤2 % for ISE and CC, and <2.5 % for IC assays; and for reproducibility were ≤3 % for ISE and CC, and <2.5 % for IC assays. Most RSI reference (94 %) and random part (93 %) CVs were ≤2 %; 99 % of runs completed without system-related interruption. 218 method comparisons generated median Passing–Bablok slope of 1.00, median bias at the medical decision point of −0.1 %, and median Pearson’s r of 0.998. Conclusions cobas pure integrated solutions demonstrated precise and accurate results under routine-like conditions and comparable results vs. commercial analyzers, supporting implementation into routine practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Laboratory Medicine Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信