以每附加MRI序列信息增益最大为约束的人工智能辅助脑肿瘤分割的最佳采集序列

Raphael M. Kronberg , Dziugas Meskelevicius , Michael Sabel , Markus Kollmann , Christian Rubbert , Igor Fischer
{"title":"以每附加MRI序列信息增益最大为约束的人工智能辅助脑肿瘤分割的最佳采集序列","authors":"Raphael M. Kronberg ,&nbsp;Dziugas Meskelevicius ,&nbsp;Michael Sabel ,&nbsp;Markus Kollmann ,&nbsp;Christian Rubbert ,&nbsp;Igor Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Different imaging sequences (T1 etc.) depict different aspects of a brain tumor. As clinical MRI examinations of the brain might be terminated prematurely, not all sequences may be acquired, decreasing the performance of automated tumor segmentation. We attempt to optimize the order of sequences, to maximize information gain in case of incomplete examination.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For segmentation we used the winner algorithm of the Brain Tumor Segmentation challenge 2018, trained on the BraTS 2020 dataset, with the objective to segment necrotic core, peritumoral edema, and enhancing tumor. We compared the segmentation performance for all combinations of sequences, using the Dice score (DS) as the primary metric. We compare the results with those which would be obtained by attempting to follow the consensus recommendations for brain tumor imaging [T1, FLAIR, T2, T1CE].</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average segmentation accuracy varies between 0.476 for T1 only and 0.751 for the full set of sequences. T1CE has a high information content, even regarding peritumoral edema and information of T2 and FLAIR were highly redundant. The optimal order of sequences appears to be [T1, T2, T1CE, FLAIR]. Comparing segmentation accuracy after each fully acquired sequence, the first sequence (T1) is the same for both, DS for [T1, T2] (proposed) is 6.2% higher than [T1, FLAIR] (aborted recommendations), and [T1, T2, T1CE] (proposed) is 34.8% higher than [T1, FLAIR, T2] (aborted recommendations).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For the purpose of optimal deep-learning-based segmentation purposes in potentially incomplete MRI examinations, the T1CE sequence should be acquired as early as possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100053"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000152/pdfft?md5=8802c9f3685beccbcf68aa15647e686f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772528622000152-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal acquisition sequence for AI-assisted brain tumor segmentation under the constraint of largest information gain per additional MRI sequence\",\"authors\":\"Raphael M. Kronberg ,&nbsp;Dziugas Meskelevicius ,&nbsp;Michael Sabel ,&nbsp;Markus Kollmann ,&nbsp;Christian Rubbert ,&nbsp;Igor Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Different imaging sequences (T1 etc.) depict different aspects of a brain tumor. As clinical MRI examinations of the brain might be terminated prematurely, not all sequences may be acquired, decreasing the performance of automated tumor segmentation. We attempt to optimize the order of sequences, to maximize information gain in case of incomplete examination.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For segmentation we used the winner algorithm of the Brain Tumor Segmentation challenge 2018, trained on the BraTS 2020 dataset, with the objective to segment necrotic core, peritumoral edema, and enhancing tumor. We compared the segmentation performance for all combinations of sequences, using the Dice score (DS) as the primary metric. We compare the results with those which would be obtained by attempting to follow the consensus recommendations for brain tumor imaging [T1, FLAIR, T2, T1CE].</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average segmentation accuracy varies between 0.476 for T1 only and 0.751 for the full set of sequences. T1CE has a high information content, even regarding peritumoral edema and information of T2 and FLAIR were highly redundant. The optimal order of sequences appears to be [T1, T2, T1CE, FLAIR]. Comparing segmentation accuracy after each fully acquired sequence, the first sequence (T1) is the same for both, DS for [T1, T2] (proposed) is 6.2% higher than [T1, FLAIR] (aborted recommendations), and [T1, T2, T1CE] (proposed) is 34.8% higher than [T1, FLAIR, T2] (aborted recommendations).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>For the purpose of optimal deep-learning-based segmentation purposes in potentially incomplete MRI examinations, the T1CE sequence should be acquired as early as possible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience informatics\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000152/pdfft?md5=8802c9f3685beccbcf68aa15647e686f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772528622000152-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

不同的成像序列(T1等)描绘脑肿瘤的不同方面。由于大脑的临床MRI检查可能过早终止,因此可能无法获得所有序列,从而降低了自动肿瘤分割的性能。我们试图优化序列的顺序,以在不完全检查的情况下最大化信息增益。方法使用BraTS 2020数据集训练的2018脑肿瘤分割挑战赛优胜者算法进行分割,目的是分割坏死核心、肿瘤周围水肿和增强肿瘤。我们比较了所有序列组合的分割性能,使用Dice分数(DS)作为主要指标。我们将结果与试图遵循一致建议的脑肿瘤成像[T1, FLAIR, T2, T1CE]所获得的结果进行比较。结果该方法的平均分割准确率为0.476 (T1)和0.751(全序列)。T1CE信息含量高,甚至关于肿瘤周围水肿,T2和FLAIR信息高度冗余。序列的最优顺序为[T1, T2, T1CE, FLAIR]。比较每个完全获取序列后的分割精度,两者的第一个序列(T1)的分割精度相同,[T1, T2](建议)的分割精度比[T1, FLAIR](放弃推荐)高6.2%,[T1, T2, T1CE](建议)的分割精度比[T1, FLAIR, T2](放弃推荐)高34.8%。结论为了在可能不完整的MRI检查中实现最佳的深度学习分割目的,应尽早获取T1CE序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal acquisition sequence for AI-assisted brain tumor segmentation under the constraint of largest information gain per additional MRI sequence

Purpose

Different imaging sequences (T1 etc.) depict different aspects of a brain tumor. As clinical MRI examinations of the brain might be terminated prematurely, not all sequences may be acquired, decreasing the performance of automated tumor segmentation. We attempt to optimize the order of sequences, to maximize information gain in case of incomplete examination.

Methods

For segmentation we used the winner algorithm of the Brain Tumor Segmentation challenge 2018, trained on the BraTS 2020 dataset, with the objective to segment necrotic core, peritumoral edema, and enhancing tumor. We compared the segmentation performance for all combinations of sequences, using the Dice score (DS) as the primary metric. We compare the results with those which would be obtained by attempting to follow the consensus recommendations for brain tumor imaging [T1, FLAIR, T2, T1CE].

Results

The average segmentation accuracy varies between 0.476 for T1 only and 0.751 for the full set of sequences. T1CE has a high information content, even regarding peritumoral edema and information of T2 and FLAIR were highly redundant. The optimal order of sequences appears to be [T1, T2, T1CE, FLAIR]. Comparing segmentation accuracy after each fully acquired sequence, the first sequence (T1) is the same for both, DS for [T1, T2] (proposed) is 6.2% higher than [T1, FLAIR] (aborted recommendations), and [T1, T2, T1CE] (proposed) is 34.8% higher than [T1, FLAIR, T2] (aborted recommendations).

Conclusion

For the purpose of optimal deep-learning-based segmentation purposes in potentially incomplete MRI examinations, the T1CE sequence should be acquired as early as possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信