主题1流行病学和信息学

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
C. Armon
{"title":"主题1流行病学和信息学","authors":"C. Armon","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2019.1646989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Identifying mechanisms of neurodegenerative disease causation has for long seemed to be beyond the pale of traditional epidemiological tools. Elucidating a plausible mechanism for initiation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has appeared particularly elusive (1). The impression, that environmental risk factors for ALS were not providing consistent direction, meant there was no sturdy epidemiologically-based \"handle\" to grasp when trying to envisage a biological mechanism for triggering sporadic ALS (2). There have been challenges with interpreting the data. At times, generic concerns over potential limitations of traditional epidemiological studies have appeared to overshadow the findings in circumstances where these limitations had been overcome largely. At other times, studies with different degrees of methodological limitations have been lumped together, thereby obscuring the results of the studies with less limitations. On occasion, methodological limitations have been downplayed or ignored entirely.Emergence of Mendelian Randomization (MR) methods has offered the promise of overcoming some of the potential limitations of epidemiological studies that used traditional methods. MR methods apply concepts developed in the field of economics to infer causality in the presence of unmeasured confounding (3). The principal idea is: 1) a genetic pattern is identified that predicts a suspected risk factor - a laboratory value in patients' blood, or a particular behavior; 2) that pattern is sought in patients and controls; 3) excess presence of the pattern in patients suggests that the risk factor plays a causal role in producing the disease.However, application of MR methods requires that several underlying assumptions, specific to these methods, have been satisfied (3). Moreover, epidemiological analyses using MR methods need to adhere to core epidemiological and statistical principles. Finally, findings from MR studies need to be interpreted critically, with close attention to the context from which they arise, and with utilization of internal and external comparators (4,5).This presentation will discuss the assumptions that need to be met to apply MR methods in general and how they relate to studies in patients with ALS, drawing on recently published reports.","PeriodicalId":7740,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration","volume":"20 1","pages":"101 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21678421.2019.1646989","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theme 1 Epidemiology and informatics\",\"authors\":\"C. Armon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21678421.2019.1646989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Identifying mechanisms of neurodegenerative disease causation has for long seemed to be beyond the pale of traditional epidemiological tools. Elucidating a plausible mechanism for initiation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has appeared particularly elusive (1). The impression, that environmental risk factors for ALS were not providing consistent direction, meant there was no sturdy epidemiologically-based \\\"handle\\\" to grasp when trying to envisage a biological mechanism for triggering sporadic ALS (2). There have been challenges with interpreting the data. At times, generic concerns over potential limitations of traditional epidemiological studies have appeared to overshadow the findings in circumstances where these limitations had been overcome largely. At other times, studies with different degrees of methodological limitations have been lumped together, thereby obscuring the results of the studies with less limitations. On occasion, methodological limitations have been downplayed or ignored entirely.Emergence of Mendelian Randomization (MR) methods has offered the promise of overcoming some of the potential limitations of epidemiological studies that used traditional methods. MR methods apply concepts developed in the field of economics to infer causality in the presence of unmeasured confounding (3). The principal idea is: 1) a genetic pattern is identified that predicts a suspected risk factor - a laboratory value in patients' blood, or a particular behavior; 2) that pattern is sought in patients and controls; 3) excess presence of the pattern in patients suggests that the risk factor plays a causal role in producing the disease.However, application of MR methods requires that several underlying assumptions, specific to these methods, have been satisfied (3). Moreover, epidemiological analyses using MR methods need to adhere to core epidemiological and statistical principles. Finally, findings from MR studies need to be interpreted critically, with close attention to the context from which they arise, and with utilization of internal and external comparators (4,5).This presentation will discuss the assumptions that need to be met to apply MR methods in general and how they relate to studies in patients with ALS, drawing on recently published reports.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21678421.2019.1646989\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2019.1646989\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2019.1646989","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:长期以来,识别神经退行性疾病病因的机制似乎超出了传统流行病学工具的范畴。阐明肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的发病机制似乎特别难以捉摸(1)。ALS的环境风险因素没有提供一致的方向,这意味着在试图设想触发散发性ALS的生物学机制时,没有可靠的基于流行病学的“处理方法”(2)。在解释数据方面存在挑战。有时,对传统流行病学研究潜在局限性的普遍担忧似乎掩盖了这些局限性在很大程度上得到克服的情况下的发现。在其他时候,具有不同程度方法学局限性的研究被集中在一起,从而模糊了局限性较小的研究的结果。有时,方法上的局限性被淡化或完全忽视。孟德尔随机化(MR)方法的出现为克服使用传统方法的流行病学研究的一些潜在局限性提供了希望。MR方法应用经济学领域中发展起来的概念,在存在未测量的混杂因素的情况下推断因果关系(3)。主要想法是:1)确定了一种基因模式,可以预测疑似风险因素——患者血液中的实验室值,或特定行为;2) 在患者和对照组中寻求这种模式;3) 这种模式在患者中的过度存在表明,风险因素在产生这种疾病中起着因果作用。然而,MR方法的应用需要满足这些方法特有的几个基本假设(3)。此外,使用MR方法进行的流行病学分析需要遵守核心流行病学和统计原则。最后,需要对MR研究的结果进行批判性解读,密切关注其产生的背景,并使用内部和外部比较器(4,5)。本报告将根据最近发表的报告,讨论应用MR方法所需满足的假设,以及它们与ALS患者研究的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theme 1 Epidemiology and informatics
Background: Identifying mechanisms of neurodegenerative disease causation has for long seemed to be beyond the pale of traditional epidemiological tools. Elucidating a plausible mechanism for initiation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has appeared particularly elusive (1). The impression, that environmental risk factors for ALS were not providing consistent direction, meant there was no sturdy epidemiologically-based "handle" to grasp when trying to envisage a biological mechanism for triggering sporadic ALS (2). There have been challenges with interpreting the data. At times, generic concerns over potential limitations of traditional epidemiological studies have appeared to overshadow the findings in circumstances where these limitations had been overcome largely. At other times, studies with different degrees of methodological limitations have been lumped together, thereby obscuring the results of the studies with less limitations. On occasion, methodological limitations have been downplayed or ignored entirely.Emergence of Mendelian Randomization (MR) methods has offered the promise of overcoming some of the potential limitations of epidemiological studies that used traditional methods. MR methods apply concepts developed in the field of economics to infer causality in the presence of unmeasured confounding (3). The principal idea is: 1) a genetic pattern is identified that predicts a suspected risk factor - a laboratory value in patients' blood, or a particular behavior; 2) that pattern is sought in patients and controls; 3) excess presence of the pattern in patients suggests that the risk factor plays a causal role in producing the disease.However, application of MR methods requires that several underlying assumptions, specific to these methods, have been satisfied (3). Moreover, epidemiological analyses using MR methods need to adhere to core epidemiological and statistical principles. Finally, findings from MR studies need to be interpreted critically, with close attention to the context from which they arise, and with utilization of internal and external comparators (4,5).This presentation will discuss the assumptions that need to be met to apply MR methods in general and how they relate to studies in patients with ALS, drawing on recently published reports.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration is an exciting new initiative. It represents a timely expansion of the journal Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in response to the clinical, imaging pathological and genetic overlap between ALS and frontotemporal dementia. The expanded journal provides outstanding coverage of research in a wide range of issues related to motor neuron diseases, especially ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease) and cognitive decline associated with frontotemporal degeneration. The journal also covers related disorders of the neuroaxis when relevant to these core conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信