无创(近红外光)技术与常规外周静脉穿刺技术在儿科应用的随机对照临床研究

Q3 Medicine
G. F. Bomfim, Ariane Ferreira Machado Avelar, Mariana Lucas da Rocha Cunha
{"title":"无创(近红外光)技术与常规外周静脉穿刺技术在儿科应用的随机对照临床研究","authors":"G. F. Bomfim, Ariane Ferreira Machado Avelar, Mariana Lucas da Rocha Cunha","doi":"10.2309/java-d-21-00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n \n Background: Obtaining peripheral venous access, especially in children, is usually a challenging procedure for nursing professionals. In pediatric patients this is because of the small caliber of the vessels, deep localization in the tissue, and multiple previous attempts of venipuncture. This experiment compared the success in obtaining venous access in pediatric patients with the use of near-infrared light and with the conventional technique. Method: True experiment, developed in a large private general hospital and a public general hospital under the same management. The study included children aged 0 to 6 y (including newborns and pediatric patients up to 5 y, 11 mo and 29 d) under clinical or surgical treatment, undergoing peripheral venous puncture both for laboratory test collection and for infusion of medications and solutions. A total of 144 punctures were analyzed, 51.4% with the conventional technique and 48.6% using the device with near-infrared light.\n Results: The success for the conventional technique was 89.2%, and 97.1% on the technique with near-infrared light, P = 0.098, with no evidence of significant differences.\n Conclusion: The success rate for obtaining peripheral venous access in children was similar in the study groups. This study expands the knowledge about the success in the peripheral venous puncture by considering that this is not exclusively related to the use of supportive technologies.\n","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study on the Use of Noninvasive (Near-Infrared Light) Technology Compared with the Conventional Technique for Peripheral Venous Access Puncture in Pediatrics\",\"authors\":\"G. F. Bomfim, Ariane Ferreira Machado Avelar, Mariana Lucas da Rocha Cunha\",\"doi\":\"10.2309/java-d-21-00003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Background: Obtaining peripheral venous access, especially in children, is usually a challenging procedure for nursing professionals. In pediatric patients this is because of the small caliber of the vessels, deep localization in the tissue, and multiple previous attempts of venipuncture. This experiment compared the success in obtaining venous access in pediatric patients with the use of near-infrared light and with the conventional technique. Method: True experiment, developed in a large private general hospital and a public general hospital under the same management. The study included children aged 0 to 6 y (including newborns and pediatric patients up to 5 y, 11 mo and 29 d) under clinical or surgical treatment, undergoing peripheral venous puncture both for laboratory test collection and for infusion of medications and solutions. A total of 144 punctures were analyzed, 51.4% with the conventional technique and 48.6% using the device with near-infrared light.\\n Results: The success for the conventional technique was 89.2%, and 97.1% on the technique with near-infrared light, P = 0.098, with no evidence of significant differences.\\n Conclusion: The success rate for obtaining peripheral venous access in children was similar in the study groups. This study expands the knowledge about the success in the peripheral venous puncture by considering that this is not exclusively related to the use of supportive technologies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-21-00003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-21-00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:获得外周静脉通路,尤其是在儿童中,对护理专业人员来说通常是一个具有挑战性的过程。在儿科患者中,这是因为血管口径小,组织定位深,以及之前多次尝试静脉穿刺。该实验比较了近红外光和传统技术在儿科患者获得静脉通路方面的成功。方法:真实实验,在同一管理下的一家大型私立综合医院和一家公立综合医院进行开发。该研究包括0至6岁的儿童(包括新生儿和5岁、11个月和29天以下的儿科患者),他们正在接受临床或外科治疗,接受外周静脉穿刺以收集实验室测试以及输注药物和溶液。共分析了144个穿刺,其中51.4%使用传统技术,48.6%使用近红外光设备。结果:常规技术和近红外光技术的成功率分别为89.2%和97.1%,P=0.098,无显著差异。结论:研究组儿童获得外周静脉通路的成功率相似。本研究扩展了关于外周静脉穿刺成功的知识,考虑到这不仅仅与支持技术的使用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study on the Use of Noninvasive (Near-Infrared Light) Technology Compared with the Conventional Technique for Peripheral Venous Access Puncture in Pediatrics
Background: Obtaining peripheral venous access, especially in children, is usually a challenging procedure for nursing professionals. In pediatric patients this is because of the small caliber of the vessels, deep localization in the tissue, and multiple previous attempts of venipuncture. This experiment compared the success in obtaining venous access in pediatric patients with the use of near-infrared light and with the conventional technique. Method: True experiment, developed in a large private general hospital and a public general hospital under the same management. The study included children aged 0 to 6 y (including newborns and pediatric patients up to 5 y, 11 mo and 29 d) under clinical or surgical treatment, undergoing peripheral venous puncture both for laboratory test collection and for infusion of medications and solutions. A total of 144 punctures were analyzed, 51.4% with the conventional technique and 48.6% using the device with near-infrared light. Results: The success for the conventional technique was 89.2%, and 97.1% on the technique with near-infrared light, P = 0.098, with no evidence of significant differences. Conclusion: The success rate for obtaining peripheral venous access in children was similar in the study groups. This study expands the knowledge about the success in the peripheral venous puncture by considering that this is not exclusively related to the use of supportive technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access
JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信