REAS‐TMIS的密码分析与改进:远程医疗信息系统的资源高效认证方案

IF 1.5 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
C. M. Kumar, Ruhul Amin, M. Brindha
{"title":"REAS‐TMIS的密码分析与改进:远程医疗信息系统的资源高效认证方案","authors":"C. M. Kumar, Ruhul Amin, M. Brindha","doi":"10.1002/spy2.268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, Tanveer et al. proposed a resource‐efficient authentication scheme for telecare medical information systems employing the authenticated key exchange. Tanveer et al. vehemently claimed that the protocol is safe against smart card stolen attacks, password guessing attacks, anonymity and untraceability, replay attacks, man‐in‐the‐middle attacks, impersonation attacks, and so forth. We have scrutinized the Tanveer et al. protocol. Based on his attack model, we have analyzed that this protocol is not secured against session key disclosure attacks, privileged insider attacks, and medical server impersonation attacks. We have also discussed improvement mechanisms to protect the mentioned security threats.","PeriodicalId":29939,"journal":{"name":"Security and Privacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cryptanalysis and improvement of REAS‐TMIS: Resource‐efficient authentication scheme for telecare medical information system\",\"authors\":\"C. M. Kumar, Ruhul Amin, M. Brindha\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/spy2.268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, Tanveer et al. proposed a resource‐efficient authentication scheme for telecare medical information systems employing the authenticated key exchange. Tanveer et al. vehemently claimed that the protocol is safe against smart card stolen attacks, password guessing attacks, anonymity and untraceability, replay attacks, man‐in‐the‐middle attacks, impersonation attacks, and so forth. We have scrutinized the Tanveer et al. protocol. Based on his attack model, we have analyzed that this protocol is not secured against session key disclosure attacks, privileged insider attacks, and medical server impersonation attacks. We have also discussed improvement mechanisms to protect the mentioned security threats.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Security and Privacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Security and Privacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security and Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近,Tanveer等人提出了一种利用认证密钥交换的远程医疗信息系统资源高效认证方案。Tanveer等人强烈声称,该协议对智能卡被盗攻击、密码猜测攻击、匿名性和不可追踪性、重放攻击、中间人攻击、冒充攻击等都是安全的。我们仔细审查了Tanveer等人的协议。基于他的攻击模型,我们分析了该协议不能抵御会话密钥泄露攻击、特权内部攻击和医疗服务器模拟攻击。我们还讨论了保护上述安全威胁的改进机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cryptanalysis and improvement of REAS‐TMIS: Resource‐efficient authentication scheme for telecare medical information system
Recently, Tanveer et al. proposed a resource‐efficient authentication scheme for telecare medical information systems employing the authenticated key exchange. Tanveer et al. vehemently claimed that the protocol is safe against smart card stolen attacks, password guessing attacks, anonymity and untraceability, replay attacks, man‐in‐the‐middle attacks, impersonation attacks, and so forth. We have scrutinized the Tanveer et al. protocol. Based on his attack model, we have analyzed that this protocol is not secured against session key disclosure attacks, privileged insider attacks, and medical server impersonation attacks. We have also discussed improvement mechanisms to protect the mentioned security threats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信