混合物毒性评估的计算方法

IF 6.1 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Supratik Kar, Jerzy Leszczynski
{"title":"混合物毒性评估的计算方法","authors":"Supratik Kar,&nbsp;Jerzy Leszczynski","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2022.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are various paths of interactions of combination of two or more chemicals with biological systems. The response of chemicals in a mixture can be predicted employing the perceptions of concentration or dose addition for chemicals with identical mode of action (MOA) and/or common target of effect. While response addition can be considered for chemicals acting on diverse biological targets. Both hypotheses are feasible only when there is no interaction between chemicals. On the contrary, if interaction occurs between chemicals in a mixture results in synergism or potentiation if induction of activating enzyme/inhibition of detoxifying enzyme happens. In contrast, competition of individual chemicals at biological target site show antagonism. Experimental models are time-consuming and costly. Diversity of mixtures and the necessity to test multiple organisms covering different ecosystems to avail the toxicity data make the experimentalist job more challenging. There comes the importance of computational approaches, proven and efficient alternatives to fill the toxicity data gaps, prioritization of chemicals, identification of the toxicity mechanism, and risk assessment and management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"29 ","pages":"Pages 31-35"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational approaches in assessments of mixture toxicity\",\"authors\":\"Supratik Kar,&nbsp;Jerzy Leszczynski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cotox.2022.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There are various paths of interactions of combination of two or more chemicals with biological systems. The response of chemicals in a mixture can be predicted employing the perceptions of concentration or dose addition for chemicals with identical mode of action (MOA) and/or common target of effect. While response addition can be considered for chemicals acting on diverse biological targets. Both hypotheses are feasible only when there is no interaction between chemicals. On the contrary, if interaction occurs between chemicals in a mixture results in synergism or potentiation if induction of activating enzyme/inhibition of detoxifying enzyme happens. In contrast, competition of individual chemicals at biological target site show antagonism. Experimental models are time-consuming and costly. Diversity of mixtures and the necessity to test multiple organisms covering different ecosystems to avail the toxicity data make the experimentalist job more challenging. There comes the importance of computational approaches, proven and efficient alternatives to fill the toxicity data gaps, prioritization of chemicals, identification of the toxicity mechanism, and risk assessment and management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 31-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202022000043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202022000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

两种或两种以上化学物质与生物系统的相互作用有多种途径。可以利用具有相同作用模式(MOA)和/或共同作用目标的化学品的浓度或剂量添加的感知来预测混合物中化学品的反应。而对于作用于不同生物靶标的化学物质,可以考虑响应添加。只有当化学物质之间没有相互作用时,这两种假设才可行。相反,如果混合物中的化学物质之间发生相互作用,如果发生激活酶的诱导/解毒酶的抑制,则会产生协同作用或增强作用。相反,单个化学物质在生物靶点的竞争表现为拮抗作用。实验模型既耗时又昂贵。混合物的多样性以及必须测试覆盖不同生态系统的多种生物以利用毒性数据,使实验人员的工作更具挑战性。计算方法、经过验证的有效替代方法来填补毒性数据空白、确定化学品的优先次序、确定毒性机制以及风险评估和管理的重要性随之而来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computational approaches in assessments of mixture toxicity

There are various paths of interactions of combination of two or more chemicals with biological systems. The response of chemicals in a mixture can be predicted employing the perceptions of concentration or dose addition for chemicals with identical mode of action (MOA) and/or common target of effect. While response addition can be considered for chemicals acting on diverse biological targets. Both hypotheses are feasible only when there is no interaction between chemicals. On the contrary, if interaction occurs between chemicals in a mixture results in synergism or potentiation if induction of activating enzyme/inhibition of detoxifying enzyme happens. In contrast, competition of individual chemicals at biological target site show antagonism. Experimental models are time-consuming and costly. Diversity of mixtures and the necessity to test multiple organisms covering different ecosystems to avail the toxicity data make the experimentalist job more challenging. There comes the importance of computational approaches, proven and efficient alternatives to fill the toxicity data gaps, prioritization of chemicals, identification of the toxicity mechanism, and risk assessment and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Current Opinion in Toxicology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信