四分之三的ICU物理治疗师报告在实践中使用辅助设备和技术:一项国际调查的结果

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
K. Mayer, Ramona A. Carper, S. Henson, Emily A. Clonce, Warren Jay Christian, Sherif M. Seif, A. Pastva, D. Needham, P. Morris
{"title":"四分之三的ICU物理治疗师报告在实践中使用辅助设备和技术:一项国际调查的结果","authors":"K. Mayer, Ramona A. Carper, S. Henson, Emily A. Clonce, Warren Jay Christian, Sherif M. Seif, A. Pastva, D. Needham, P. Morris","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patients surviving critical illness develop persistent functional mobility impairments that significantly impact their quality of life. Early rehabilitation interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU) may mitigate the sequelae of critical illness. However, implementation of such interventions is very low in clinical practice. Assistive rehabilitation equipment and technology, such as tilt beds and cycle ergometers, provide physical therapists (PTs) with strategies to complement functional mobility interventions. Purpose: To determine PTs' self-reported use of assistive rehabilitation equipment and technology in their clinical practices in the ICU and to describe the rationale for their use. Methods: An online survey (Qualtrics), with closed- and open-ended questions, was distributed to PTs working in the ICU, via e-mail through the Academy of Acute Care Physical Therapy “PTinICU” e-mail listserv and the online ICU Recovery Network and Twitter. Descriptive statistics were used to assess frequency and rationale for the use of specific equipment and technology. Results: PTs (n = 206, mean age 39.6 ± 9.7 years, 82% female) completed the survey (81% in the United States and 19% from 12 countries outside of the United States). Respondents (153/206, 74%) reported using at least one type of equipment or technology. The most commonly used were hospital tilt beds and tilt tables (n = 106, 51%), mobilization chairs (n = 80, 39%), standing frames (n= 66, 32%), cycle ergometers (n = 63, 31%), and exercise platforms (n = 36, 17%). The most common rationale for use was as a bridge to functional mobility (response ranging from 17% to 44% depending on the technology). The most common reason for not using equipment or technology was limited or no access (71%, 37/53). PTs from outside the United States (vs US-based PTs) reported greater use of equipment or technology (n = 206, 92% vs 70%, P = .001). Conclusions: Approximately 75% of PTs completing this survey report use of assistive rehabilitation equipment and technology in their ICU clinical practice, emphasizing the need for further research to understand the clinical approaches for use and the efficacy of such technology.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-Fourths of ICU Physical Therapists Report Use of Assistive Equipment and Technology in Practice: Results of an International Survey\",\"authors\":\"K. Mayer, Ramona A. Carper, S. Henson, Emily A. Clonce, Warren Jay Christian, Sherif M. Seif, A. Pastva, D. Needham, P. Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Patients surviving critical illness develop persistent functional mobility impairments that significantly impact their quality of life. Early rehabilitation interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU) may mitigate the sequelae of critical illness. However, implementation of such interventions is very low in clinical practice. Assistive rehabilitation equipment and technology, such as tilt beds and cycle ergometers, provide physical therapists (PTs) with strategies to complement functional mobility interventions. Purpose: To determine PTs' self-reported use of assistive rehabilitation equipment and technology in their clinical practices in the ICU and to describe the rationale for their use. Methods: An online survey (Qualtrics), with closed- and open-ended questions, was distributed to PTs working in the ICU, via e-mail through the Academy of Acute Care Physical Therapy “PTinICU” e-mail listserv and the online ICU Recovery Network and Twitter. Descriptive statistics were used to assess frequency and rationale for the use of specific equipment and technology. Results: PTs (n = 206, mean age 39.6 ± 9.7 years, 82% female) completed the survey (81% in the United States and 19% from 12 countries outside of the United States). Respondents (153/206, 74%) reported using at least one type of equipment or technology. The most commonly used were hospital tilt beds and tilt tables (n = 106, 51%), mobilization chairs (n = 80, 39%), standing frames (n= 66, 32%), cycle ergometers (n = 63, 31%), and exercise platforms (n = 36, 17%). The most common rationale for use was as a bridge to functional mobility (response ranging from 17% to 44% depending on the technology). The most common reason for not using equipment or technology was limited or no access (71%, 37/53). PTs from outside the United States (vs US-based PTs) reported greater use of equipment or technology (n = 206, 92% vs 70%, P = .001). Conclusions: Approximately 75% of PTs completing this survey report use of assistive rehabilitation equipment and technology in their ICU clinical practice, emphasizing the need for further research to understand the clinical approaches for use and the efficacy of such technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

危重疾病存活的患者会出现持续的功能活动障碍,严重影响他们的生活质量。重症监护病房(ICU)的早期康复干预可以减轻危重疾病的后遗症。然而,这些干预措施的实施在临床实践中非常低。辅助康复设备和技术,如倾斜床和自行车测力仪,为物理治疗师(PTs)提供了补充功能活动干预的策略。目的:了解患者在ICU临床实践中使用辅助康复设备和技术的情况,并描述其使用的理由。方法:通过急性护理物理治疗学会(PTinICU)电子邮件列表、在线ICU康复网络和Twitter,通过电子邮件向在ICU工作的PTs分发一份在线调查问卷(qualics),其中包括封闭式和开放式问题。使用描述性统计来评估使用特定设备和技术的频率和理由。结果:患者(n = 206名,平均年龄39.6±9.7岁,82%为女性)完成了调查(81%来自美国,19%来自美国以外的12个国家)。受访者(153/206,74%)报告至少使用一种设备或技术。最常用的是医院倾斜床和倾斜桌(n= 106, 51%)、活动椅(n= 80, 39%)、站立架(n= 66, 32%)、自行车测力仪(n= 63, 31%)和运动平台(n= 36, 17%)。最常见的使用理由是作为功能性移动性的桥梁(根据技术的不同,回答从17%到44%不等)。不使用设备或技术的最常见原因是有限或无法使用(71%,37/53)。来自美国以外的PTs(与美国PTs相比)报告了更多的设备或技术使用(n = 206,92%对70%,P = 0.001)。结论:完成本次调查的患者中,约75%的患者在其ICU临床实践中使用了辅助康复设备和技术,强调需要进一步研究以了解此类技术的临床使用方法和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three-Fourths of ICU Physical Therapists Report Use of Assistive Equipment and Technology in Practice: Results of an International Survey
Introduction: Patients surviving critical illness develop persistent functional mobility impairments that significantly impact their quality of life. Early rehabilitation interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU) may mitigate the sequelae of critical illness. However, implementation of such interventions is very low in clinical practice. Assistive rehabilitation equipment and technology, such as tilt beds and cycle ergometers, provide physical therapists (PTs) with strategies to complement functional mobility interventions. Purpose: To determine PTs' self-reported use of assistive rehabilitation equipment and technology in their clinical practices in the ICU and to describe the rationale for their use. Methods: An online survey (Qualtrics), with closed- and open-ended questions, was distributed to PTs working in the ICU, via e-mail through the Academy of Acute Care Physical Therapy “PTinICU” e-mail listserv and the online ICU Recovery Network and Twitter. Descriptive statistics were used to assess frequency and rationale for the use of specific equipment and technology. Results: PTs (n = 206, mean age 39.6 ± 9.7 years, 82% female) completed the survey (81% in the United States and 19% from 12 countries outside of the United States). Respondents (153/206, 74%) reported using at least one type of equipment or technology. The most commonly used were hospital tilt beds and tilt tables (n = 106, 51%), mobilization chairs (n = 80, 39%), standing frames (n= 66, 32%), cycle ergometers (n = 63, 31%), and exercise platforms (n = 36, 17%). The most common rationale for use was as a bridge to functional mobility (response ranging from 17% to 44% depending on the technology). The most common reason for not using equipment or technology was limited or no access (71%, 37/53). PTs from outside the United States (vs US-based PTs) reported greater use of equipment or technology (n = 206, 92% vs 70%, P = .001). Conclusions: Approximately 75% of PTs completing this survey report use of assistive rehabilitation equipment and technology in their ICU clinical practice, emphasizing the need for further research to understand the clinical approaches for use and the efficacy of such technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信