船只、航海与美洲和加利福尼亚海峡群岛的殖民:对卡西迪的回应(2021)

IF 0.6 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
J. Erlandson, T. Braje
{"title":"船只、航海与美洲和加利福尼亚海峡群岛的殖民:对卡西迪的回应(2021)","authors":"J. Erlandson, T. Braje","doi":"10.1080/1947461X.2022.2125711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n In a recent issue of California Archaeology, Jim Cassidy (2021. “A Technological Assessment of the North Pacific Seafaring Hypothesis: Informed by California Channel Island Research.” California Archaeology 13 (1): 69–92). provided a flawed assessment of the potential role boats and seafaring played in the initial peopling of the Americas, as well as the nature of watercraft used to settle Santarosae and California’s other Channel Islands. His arguments contain numerous errors and inconsistencies and are based primarily on his previously published interpretation of lithic tools from the Early Holocene component at the Eel Point site on San Clemente Island. Here, we point out the most obvious errors and weaknesses in Cassidy’s arguments and present a more realistic view of what we know and do not know about early seafaring and maritime technology in North America and southern California.","PeriodicalId":42699,"journal":{"name":"California Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boats, Seafaring, and the Colonization of the Americas and California Channel Islands: A Response to Cassidy (2021)\",\"authors\":\"J. Erlandson, T. Braje\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1947461X.2022.2125711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n In a recent issue of California Archaeology, Jim Cassidy (2021. “A Technological Assessment of the North Pacific Seafaring Hypothesis: Informed by California Channel Island Research.” California Archaeology 13 (1): 69–92). provided a flawed assessment of the potential role boats and seafaring played in the initial peopling of the Americas, as well as the nature of watercraft used to settle Santarosae and California’s other Channel Islands. His arguments contain numerous errors and inconsistencies and are based primarily on his previously published interpretation of lithic tools from the Early Holocene component at the Eel Point site on San Clemente Island. Here, we point out the most obvious errors and weaknesses in Cassidy’s arguments and present a more realistic view of what we know and do not know about early seafaring and maritime technology in North America and southern California.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"California Archaeology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"California Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1947461X.2022.2125711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"California Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1947461X.2022.2125711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在最近一期的《加州考古》杂志上,Jim Cassidy(2021。《北太平洋航海假说的技术评估:加州海峡岛研究》,《加州考古》13(1):69-92)。对船只和航海在美洲最初的人口中所扮演的潜在角色,以及用于安置Santarosae和加利福尼亚其他海峡群岛的船只的性质进行了有缺陷的评估。他的论点包含了许多错误和不一致之处,主要基于他之前发表的对圣克莱门特岛鳗鱼角遗址全新世早期部分石器工具的解释。在这里,我们指出了卡西迪论点中最明显的错误和弱点,并对我们对北美和南加州早期航海和海事技术的了解和不了解提出了更现实的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Boats, Seafaring, and the Colonization of the Americas and California Channel Islands: A Response to Cassidy (2021)
ABSTRACT In a recent issue of California Archaeology, Jim Cassidy (2021. “A Technological Assessment of the North Pacific Seafaring Hypothesis: Informed by California Channel Island Research.” California Archaeology 13 (1): 69–92). provided a flawed assessment of the potential role boats and seafaring played in the initial peopling of the Americas, as well as the nature of watercraft used to settle Santarosae and California’s other Channel Islands. His arguments contain numerous errors and inconsistencies and are based primarily on his previously published interpretation of lithic tools from the Early Holocene component at the Eel Point site on San Clemente Island. Here, we point out the most obvious errors and weaknesses in Cassidy’s arguments and present a more realistic view of what we know and do not know about early seafaring and maritime technology in North America and southern California.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
California Archaeology
California Archaeology ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信