初级门诊保健中的公民控制——保加利亚的机会和现实

Q4 Medicine
T. Zlatanova, M. Djuglarska, N. A. Popov, D. Shtereva-Tzоuni, T. Petrova-Gotova, R. Yaneva, E. Naseva, M. Lazarova, T. Stoyanova, N. N. Popov
{"title":"初级门诊保健中的公民控制——保加利亚的机会和现实","authors":"T. Zlatanova, M. Djuglarska, N. A. Popov, D. Shtereva-Tzоuni, T. Petrova-Gotova, R. Yaneva, E. Naseva, M. Lazarova, T. Stoyanova, N. N. Popov","doi":"10.2478/amb-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The significance of control increases with the push towards improving the overall effectiveness of the health insurance system. In order for public resources to be spent lawfully and effectively, there needs to be increased control not only from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), but citizen control also needs to be incorporated in the process. Materials and Methods The goal of this survey is to analyze the opportunities for implementing citizen control over the spending of public health funds and compare them to the real conditions as far as the outpatient medical care level. Legislation and news from NHIF’s webpage related to citizen control opportunities were studied. A direct, anonymous survey was carried out on the Google forms platform amongst Bulgarian citizens past the age of majority. Results The results of the questionnaire survey carried out between 24.06.2022 and 16.10.2022 among 1045 adults with compulsory health insurance from all over the country, showed that they were poorly informed on the opportunities for citizen control which have been regulated and created in practice and don’t take advantage of them. Only 45,6% of the participants were aware of the digital services “Record review for health-insured persons”, which is found on NHIF’s webpage, and less than half of them (42,8%) used this service. The NHIF’s mobile application for feedback was used by as little as 11,8% of the respondents, and only seven patients have used it to share an opinion, while nine have used it to get notifications for data changes in their patient record. The portion of participants who have taken part in NHIF inquiries was also very small – 2,5%. Merely 2,8% have posted a complaint to the NHIF after being denied medical services. Conclusions All of this makes it evident that a change is necessary in order for citizen control to be strengthened as a mechanism. This will lead to the correction of proven deviations in reported medical activities and will make it easier to get the patients’ opinions on the medical care they have been provided with.","PeriodicalId":35746,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Bulgarica","volume":"50 1","pages":"49 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizen Control in Primary Outpatient Care – Opportunities and Realities in Bulgaria\",\"authors\":\"T. Zlatanova, M. Djuglarska, N. A. Popov, D. Shtereva-Tzоuni, T. Petrova-Gotova, R. Yaneva, E. Naseva, M. Lazarova, T. Stoyanova, N. N. Popov\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/amb-2023-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The significance of control increases with the push towards improving the overall effectiveness of the health insurance system. In order for public resources to be spent lawfully and effectively, there needs to be increased control not only from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), but citizen control also needs to be incorporated in the process. Materials and Methods The goal of this survey is to analyze the opportunities for implementing citizen control over the spending of public health funds and compare them to the real conditions as far as the outpatient medical care level. Legislation and news from NHIF’s webpage related to citizen control opportunities were studied. A direct, anonymous survey was carried out on the Google forms platform amongst Bulgarian citizens past the age of majority. Results The results of the questionnaire survey carried out between 24.06.2022 and 16.10.2022 among 1045 adults with compulsory health insurance from all over the country, showed that they were poorly informed on the opportunities for citizen control which have been regulated and created in practice and don’t take advantage of them. Only 45,6% of the participants were aware of the digital services “Record review for health-insured persons”, which is found on NHIF’s webpage, and less than half of them (42,8%) used this service. The NHIF’s mobile application for feedback was used by as little as 11,8% of the respondents, and only seven patients have used it to share an opinion, while nine have used it to get notifications for data changes in their patient record. The portion of participants who have taken part in NHIF inquiries was also very small – 2,5%. Merely 2,8% have posted a complaint to the NHIF after being denied medical services. Conclusions All of this makes it evident that a change is necessary in order for citizen control to be strengthened as a mechanism. This will lead to the correction of proven deviations in reported medical activities and will make it easier to get the patients’ opinions on the medical care they have been provided with.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medica Bulgarica\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"49 - 59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medica Bulgarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2023-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Bulgarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2023-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着医疗保险制度整体有效性的提高,控制的意义也越来越大。为了合法和有效地使用公共资源,不仅需要加强国家健康保险基金的控制,而且还需要在这一过程中纳入公民控制。材料与方法本调查的目的是分析实施公民控制公共卫生资金支出的机会,并将其与门诊医疗水平的实际情况进行比较。研究了国家卫生基金网页上有关公民控制机会的立法和新闻。在谷歌表格平台上对超过成年年龄的保加利亚公民进行了直接的匿名调查。结果于2022年6月24日至2022年10月16日对来自全国各地的1045名参加强制性医疗保险的成年人进行问卷调查,结果表明他们对实践中规定和创造的公民控制机会知之甚少,并且没有利用这些机会。只有45.6%的参与者知道国家卫生基金网页上的数字服务“健康参保人记录审查”,其中不到一半(42.8%)使用了这项服务。只有11.8%的受访者使用了国家卫生基金的反馈移动应用程序,只有7名患者使用它来分享意见,而9名患者使用它来获取患者记录数据更改的通知。参与NHIF调查的参与者比例也非常小,只有2.5%。只有2.8%的人在被拒绝提供医疗服务后向国民健康保险基金投诉。所有这些都表明,为了使公民控制作为一种机制得到加强,变革是必要的。这将导致纠正报告的医疗活动中已证实的偏差,并将更容易获得患者对所提供的医疗服务的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Citizen Control in Primary Outpatient Care – Opportunities and Realities in Bulgaria
Abstract The significance of control increases with the push towards improving the overall effectiveness of the health insurance system. In order for public resources to be spent lawfully and effectively, there needs to be increased control not only from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), but citizen control also needs to be incorporated in the process. Materials and Methods The goal of this survey is to analyze the opportunities for implementing citizen control over the spending of public health funds and compare them to the real conditions as far as the outpatient medical care level. Legislation and news from NHIF’s webpage related to citizen control opportunities were studied. A direct, anonymous survey was carried out on the Google forms platform amongst Bulgarian citizens past the age of majority. Results The results of the questionnaire survey carried out between 24.06.2022 and 16.10.2022 among 1045 adults with compulsory health insurance from all over the country, showed that they were poorly informed on the opportunities for citizen control which have been regulated and created in practice and don’t take advantage of them. Only 45,6% of the participants were aware of the digital services “Record review for health-insured persons”, which is found on NHIF’s webpage, and less than half of them (42,8%) used this service. The NHIF’s mobile application for feedback was used by as little as 11,8% of the respondents, and only seven patients have used it to share an opinion, while nine have used it to get notifications for data changes in their patient record. The portion of participants who have taken part in NHIF inquiries was also very small – 2,5%. Merely 2,8% have posted a complaint to the NHIF after being denied medical services. Conclusions All of this makes it evident that a change is necessary in order for citizen control to be strengthened as a mechanism. This will lead to the correction of proven deviations in reported medical activities and will make it easier to get the patients’ opinions on the medical care they have been provided with.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Medica Bulgarica
Acta Medica Bulgarica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: About 30 years ago - in 1973, on the initiative of the Publishing House „Medicine and Physical Culture", namely its former director Mr. Traian Ivanov, the Ministry of Health set up and accepted to subsidize a new medical magazine that was to be published only in the English language and had to reflect the status and the achievements of the Bulgarian medical science. Thus the language barrier was overcome and stable relations were established with the international medical society, large libraries, and university centers. The famous internationally known scientist professor Assen A. Hadjiolov was elected edition-in-chief by the first editorial staff and the magazine was named Acta Medica Bulgarica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信