注意差距:伊斯兰会计和金融理论,伊斯兰经济学和商业管理研究

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
M. Mukhlisin, Nurizal Ismail, Reza Jamilah Fikri
{"title":"注意差距:伊斯兰会计和金融理论,伊斯兰经济学和商业管理研究","authors":"M. Mukhlisin, Nurizal Ismail, Reza Jamilah Fikri","doi":"10.1108/ijif-11-2019-0175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to analyse whether theories and views of classical Islamic scholars are widely adopted as references in Islamic accounting and finance (IAF), Islamic economics (IE) and Islamic business management (IBM) research studies as part of their contribution to solving current economic and financial problems.Design/methodology/approachThe research adopts a qualitative meta-analysis methodology using NVivo 12 with selected data from 474 international journal articles published between 1981 and 2021. The study considers 172 IAF articles, 111 IE articles and 191 IBM articles.FindingsThe results of the study show that the use of theories and views of classical Islamic scholars is not widespread among the examined research papers. The findings show that 90% of researchers tend to acquire modern economics, management, psychological and sociological theories instead of classical theories. Both modern and classical theories have been discussed in the studied articles namely agency theory, stakeholders' theory, ḥisbah (accountability), maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah (objectives of Islamic law) and Waʿd (unilateral promise). The gaps prevail not only in the taxonomy of terms but also in the choice of paradigm references. It is found that 66% of the 474 journal articles adopt a positivist paradigm, followed by interpretivism (19%), post-structuralism (9%) and critical orientation (6%).Research limitations/implicationsThis paper considers only ABS ranking journal articles. Future research may consider other journal articles from different ranking groups such as Scopus or Thomson & Reuters.Practical implicationsThe paper sheds light on how Islamic educational institutions can develop strategies for the Integration of Knowledge (IOK) in their curriculum.Social implicationsThis paper helps to shape the Muslims' way of thinking within an Islamic worldview which will lead to an Islamic way of expressing knowledge, skill and behaviour.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the model of IOK that has been deliberated among Islamic universities, especially those that develop IAF, IE and IBM studies.","PeriodicalId":54072,"journal":{"name":"ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the gap: theories in Islamic accounting and finance, Islamic economics and business management studies\",\"authors\":\"M. Mukhlisin, Nurizal Ismail, Reza Jamilah Fikri\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijif-11-2019-0175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims to analyse whether theories and views of classical Islamic scholars are widely adopted as references in Islamic accounting and finance (IAF), Islamic economics (IE) and Islamic business management (IBM) research studies as part of their contribution to solving current economic and financial problems.Design/methodology/approachThe research adopts a qualitative meta-analysis methodology using NVivo 12 with selected data from 474 international journal articles published between 1981 and 2021. The study considers 172 IAF articles, 111 IE articles and 191 IBM articles.FindingsThe results of the study show that the use of theories and views of classical Islamic scholars is not widespread among the examined research papers. The findings show that 90% of researchers tend to acquire modern economics, management, psychological and sociological theories instead of classical theories. Both modern and classical theories have been discussed in the studied articles namely agency theory, stakeholders' theory, ḥisbah (accountability), maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah (objectives of Islamic law) and Waʿd (unilateral promise). The gaps prevail not only in the taxonomy of terms but also in the choice of paradigm references. It is found that 66% of the 474 journal articles adopt a positivist paradigm, followed by interpretivism (19%), post-structuralism (9%) and critical orientation (6%).Research limitations/implicationsThis paper considers only ABS ranking journal articles. Future research may consider other journal articles from different ranking groups such as Scopus or Thomson & Reuters.Practical implicationsThe paper sheds light on how Islamic educational institutions can develop strategies for the Integration of Knowledge (IOK) in their curriculum.Social implicationsThis paper helps to shape the Muslims' way of thinking within an Islamic worldview which will lead to an Islamic way of expressing knowledge, skill and behaviour.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the model of IOK that has been deliberated among Islamic universities, especially those that develop IAF, IE and IBM studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijif-11-2019-0175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijif-11-2019-0175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在分析古典伊斯兰学者的理论和观点是否被广泛采用作为伊斯兰会计和金融(IAF)、伊斯兰经济学(IE)和伊斯兰商业管理(IBM)研究的参考,作为他们对解决当前经济和金融问题的贡献的一部分。设计/方法/方法本研究采用定性荟萃分析方法,使用NVivo 12,选择1981年至2021年间发表的474篇国际期刊文章的数据。该研究考虑了172篇IAF文章,111篇IE文章和191篇IBM文章。研究结果表明,在被调查的研究论文中,使用古典伊斯兰学者的理论和观点并不普遍。研究结果表明,90%的研究人员倾向于获取现代经济学、管理学、心理学和社会学理论,而不是经典理论。所研究的文章讨论了现代理论和古典理论,即代理理论、利益相关者理论、ḥisbah(问责制)、maqāṣid al- shari ā ah(伊斯兰法的目标)和Wa ā d(单方面承诺)。这种差距不仅存在于术语的分类上,而且存在于范式参考的选择上。研究发现,在474篇期刊论文中,66%采用实证主义范式,其次是解释主义(19%)、后结构主义(9%)和批判取向(6%)。研究局限/启示本文仅考虑ABS对期刊文章的排名。未来的研究可能会考虑来自不同排名组的其他期刊文章,如Scopus或Thomson & Reuters。实践意义本文阐明了伊斯兰教育机构如何在其课程中制定知识整合(IOK)策略。这篇论文有助于在伊斯兰世界观中塑造穆斯林的思维方式,这将导致伊斯兰表达知识、技能和行为的方式。原创性/价值本文对伊斯兰大学,特别是那些发展IAF、IE和IBM研究的大学,所讨论的IOK模式做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mind the gap: theories in Islamic accounting and finance, Islamic economics and business management studies
PurposeThis study aims to analyse whether theories and views of classical Islamic scholars are widely adopted as references in Islamic accounting and finance (IAF), Islamic economics (IE) and Islamic business management (IBM) research studies as part of their contribution to solving current economic and financial problems.Design/methodology/approachThe research adopts a qualitative meta-analysis methodology using NVivo 12 with selected data from 474 international journal articles published between 1981 and 2021. The study considers 172 IAF articles, 111 IE articles and 191 IBM articles.FindingsThe results of the study show that the use of theories and views of classical Islamic scholars is not widespread among the examined research papers. The findings show that 90% of researchers tend to acquire modern economics, management, psychological and sociological theories instead of classical theories. Both modern and classical theories have been discussed in the studied articles namely agency theory, stakeholders' theory, ḥisbah (accountability), maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah (objectives of Islamic law) and Waʿd (unilateral promise). The gaps prevail not only in the taxonomy of terms but also in the choice of paradigm references. It is found that 66% of the 474 journal articles adopt a positivist paradigm, followed by interpretivism (19%), post-structuralism (9%) and critical orientation (6%).Research limitations/implicationsThis paper considers only ABS ranking journal articles. Future research may consider other journal articles from different ranking groups such as Scopus or Thomson & Reuters.Practical implicationsThe paper sheds light on how Islamic educational institutions can develop strategies for the Integration of Knowledge (IOK) in their curriculum.Social implicationsThis paper helps to shape the Muslims' way of thinking within an Islamic worldview which will lead to an Islamic way of expressing knowledge, skill and behaviour.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the model of IOK that has been deliberated among Islamic universities, especially those that develop IAF, IE and IBM studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
18
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: It is the aspiration of the editorial committee that IJIF achieves the highest rank in quality and substance. It is thus our aim that the journal be carried in the Thompson Reuters’ ISI and Scopus databases. By ensuring high standards in articles published in Islamic finance we ensure that further innovation and research is carried out and promoted in the Islamic finance industry and academia. IJIF publishes 2 issues per annum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信