基于深度学习卷积神经网络的Sentinel-2与Landsat 8 OLI卫星影像土壤盐分分布图比较

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q3 REMOTE SENSING
Mohammad Kazemi Garajeh, T. Blaschke, Vahid Hossein Haghi, Qihao Weng, Khalil Valizadeh Kamran, Zhenlong Li
{"title":"基于深度学习卷积神经网络的Sentinel-2与Landsat 8 OLI卫星影像土壤盐分分布图比较","authors":"Mohammad Kazemi Garajeh, T. Blaschke, Vahid Hossein Haghi, Qihao Weng, Khalil Valizadeh Kamran, Zhenlong Li","doi":"10.1080/07038992.2022.2056435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we aim to compare the suitability of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 OLI images for detecting and mapping soil salinity distribution (SSD) using a deep learning convolutional neural network (DL-CNN) approach. We first identified and selected six SSD predisposing variables to train the models. These variables are the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), land use, soil types, geomorphology, land surface temperature, and evaporation rate. Next, we collected 219 ground control points from the top 20 cm of the soil surface and randomly divided them into training (70%) and validation (30%) datasets. We then evaluated the different activation, loss/cost, and optimization functions and, finally, employed ReLu, Cross-Entropy, and Adam as the most effective activation function, loss/cost function, and optimizer, respectively. The results showed that the Sentinel-2 image (94.78% overall accuracy and a Kappa of 93.14%) is more suitable for detecting and mapping SSD than the Landsat 8 OLI image (91.45% overall accuracy and a Kappa of 90.45%). Our findings also demonstrated that the DL-CNN approach can support fast and reliable image analysis and classification. As such, this research is a promising step toward understanding, controlling, and managing the complex mechanisms of soil salinization.","PeriodicalId":48843,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing","volume":"48 1","pages":"452 - 468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison between Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 OLI Satellite Images for Soil Salinity Distribution Mapping Using a Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Kazemi Garajeh, T. Blaschke, Vahid Hossein Haghi, Qihao Weng, Khalil Valizadeh Kamran, Zhenlong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07038992.2022.2056435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this paper, we aim to compare the suitability of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 OLI images for detecting and mapping soil salinity distribution (SSD) using a deep learning convolutional neural network (DL-CNN) approach. We first identified and selected six SSD predisposing variables to train the models. These variables are the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), land use, soil types, geomorphology, land surface temperature, and evaporation rate. Next, we collected 219 ground control points from the top 20 cm of the soil surface and randomly divided them into training (70%) and validation (30%) datasets. We then evaluated the different activation, loss/cost, and optimization functions and, finally, employed ReLu, Cross-Entropy, and Adam as the most effective activation function, loss/cost function, and optimizer, respectively. The results showed that the Sentinel-2 image (94.78% overall accuracy and a Kappa of 93.14%) is more suitable for detecting and mapping SSD than the Landsat 8 OLI image (91.45% overall accuracy and a Kappa of 90.45%). Our findings also demonstrated that the DL-CNN approach can support fast and reliable image analysis and classification. As such, this research is a promising step toward understanding, controlling, and managing the complex mechanisms of soil salinization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"452 - 468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2022.2056435\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2022.2056435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在本文中,我们旨在比较Sentinel-2和Landsat 8 OLI图像使用深度学习卷积神经网络(DL-CNN)方法检测和绘制土壤盐度分布(SSD)的适用性。我们首先确定并选择了6个SSD易感变量来训练模型。这些变量包括归一化植被指数(NDVI)、土地利用、土壤类型、地貌、地表温度和蒸发速率。接下来,我们从土壤表面顶部20 cm处收集219个地面控制点,并将其随机分为训练(70%)和验证(30%)数据集。然后,我们评估了不同的激活函数、损失/成本函数和优化函数,最后,分别使用ReLu、Cross-Entropy和Adam作为最有效的激活函数、损失/成本函数和优化器。结果表明,Sentinel-2图像(总体精度为94.78%,Kappa为93.14%)比Landsat 8 OLI图像(总体精度为91.45%,Kappa为90.45%)更适合于SSD的检测和制图。我们的研究结果还表明,DL-CNN方法可以支持快速可靠的图像分析和分类。因此,这项研究是朝着理解、控制和管理土壤盐碱化复杂机制迈出的有希望的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison between Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 OLI Satellite Images for Soil Salinity Distribution Mapping Using a Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network
Abstract In this paper, we aim to compare the suitability of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 OLI images for detecting and mapping soil salinity distribution (SSD) using a deep learning convolutional neural network (DL-CNN) approach. We first identified and selected six SSD predisposing variables to train the models. These variables are the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), land use, soil types, geomorphology, land surface temperature, and evaporation rate. Next, we collected 219 ground control points from the top 20 cm of the soil surface and randomly divided them into training (70%) and validation (30%) datasets. We then evaluated the different activation, loss/cost, and optimization functions and, finally, employed ReLu, Cross-Entropy, and Adam as the most effective activation function, loss/cost function, and optimizer, respectively. The results showed that the Sentinel-2 image (94.78% overall accuracy and a Kappa of 93.14%) is more suitable for detecting and mapping SSD than the Landsat 8 OLI image (91.45% overall accuracy and a Kappa of 90.45%). Our findings also demonstrated that the DL-CNN approach can support fast and reliable image analysis and classification. As such, this research is a promising step toward understanding, controlling, and managing the complex mechanisms of soil salinization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing / Journal canadien de télédétection is a publication of the Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute (CASI) and the official journal of the Canadian Remote Sensing Society (CRSS-SCT). Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing provides a forum for the publication of scientific research and review articles. The journal publishes topics including sensor and algorithm development, image processing techniques and advances focused on a wide range of remote sensing applications including, but not restricted to; forestry and agriculture, ecology, hydrology and water resources, oceans and ice, geology, urban, atmosphere, and environmental science. Articles can cover local to global scales and can be directly relevant to the Canadian, or equally important, the international community. The international editorial board provides expertise in a wide range of remote sensing theory and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信