以新的方式持有

Q4 Social Sciences
Michael Zvára
{"title":"以新的方式持有","authors":"Michael Zvára","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2022.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the re-established approach to possession in the Czech law. Attention is paid to the definition of the object of possession and the honesty in the law of possession. The article analyses the re-established concept of honesty in the law of possession in relation to the historical legal framework on the current territory of the Czech Republic and in relation to the Austrian law. The article also refers to the new institute of extraordinary prescription and itʼs relation to the law of possession in general and to ordinary prescription. It’s also refers to the relationship between the legal framework of possession and unjust enrichment, whereas the relationship between these concepts is not solved in a completely satisfactory way.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Držba v novém pojetí\",\"authors\":\"Michael Zvára\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23366478.2022.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the re-established approach to possession in the Czech law. Attention is paid to the definition of the object of possession and the honesty in the law of possession. The article analyses the re-established concept of honesty in the law of possession in relation to the historical legal framework on the current territory of the Czech Republic and in relation to the Austrian law. The article also refers to the new institute of extraordinary prescription and itʼs relation to the law of possession in general and to ordinary prescription. It’s also refers to the relationship between the legal framework of possession and unjust enrichment, whereas the relationship between these concepts is not solved in a completely satisfactory way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了捷克法律中重新确立的占有方法。注意占有客体的界定和占有法中的诚实信用。本文结合捷克共和国目前领土上的历史法律框架和奥地利法律,分析了占有法中重新确立的诚实概念。该条还提到了新的特别时效制度及其与一般占有法和普通时效的关系。它也指占有和不当得利法律框架之间的关系,而这些概念之间的关系并没有以完全令人满意的方式得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Držba v novém pojetí
The article deals with the re-established approach to possession in the Czech law. Attention is paid to the definition of the object of possession and the honesty in the law of possession. The article analyses the re-established concept of honesty in the law of possession in relation to the historical legal framework on the current territory of the Czech Republic and in relation to the Austrian law. The article also refers to the new institute of extraordinary prescription and itʼs relation to the law of possession in general and to ordinary prescription. It’s also refers to the relationship between the legal framework of possession and unjust enrichment, whereas the relationship between these concepts is not solved in a completely satisfactory way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信