Q4 Social Sciences
Ivan Vukorepa
{"title":"Faktičan (neizravan) prijenos gospodarske cjeline i utjecaj na radnopravni položaj radnika","authors":"Ivan Vukorepa","doi":"10.3935/zpfz.72.12.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transfer of undertakings, businesses or their parts, consequently leading to an ex lege transfer of an employment contract to the transferee as a new employer usually formally takes place on the basis of a direct legal transaction, usually directly between the transferor and the transferee, e.g. purchase, lease, or merger. However, in order to protect workers' rights, the case law of the Court of Justice has established that transfer may also occur in situations where there is no classical direct contractual relationship between the transferor and the transferee, but rather a third party's will (e.g. one company loses the right to provide a certain economic service and the other gains it), as a result of which the transferee actually continues to perform the economic activity that was previously performed by the transferor, provided that the subject of the transfer is an economic entity that retains its identity. In such situations, the safeguarding of workers' rights also depends on whether it is a labour-intensive business (an activity based mainly on the labour force) or asset-intensive business (an activity based mainly on expensive equipment). Therefore, I refer to this situation a factual (indirect) transfer, because it does not occur directly on the basis of a formal legal transaction between the transferor and the transferee, but in fact indirectly, depending on the circumstances of the case and the economic activity being transferred. Given that such case law of the Court of Justice of EU can result in a significant cost in the form of a de facto obligation to take over workers and their acquired rights that the transferee did not count on, the primary purpose of this paper is to identify the preconditions and the main features of the factual (indirect) transfer of an economic entity that retains its identity, and to pinpoint in what circumstances there may be an obligation to take over workers.","PeriodicalId":34908,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.72.12.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业、企业或其部分的转让,从而导致雇佣合同依法转让给作为新雇主的受让方,通常是在直接的法律交易的基础上正式发生的,通常是在转让方和受让方之间直接进行的,例如购买、租赁或合并。然而,为了保护工人的权利,法院的判例法规定,转让也可能发生在转让方和受让方之间没有传统的直接合同关系,而是第三方意愿的情况下(例如,一家公司失去了提供某种经济服务的权利,而另一家公司获得了这种权利)。因此,受让人实际上继续从事转让人以前从事的经济活动,但转让的主体是保持其身份的经济实体。在这种情况下,工人权利的保障还取决于它是劳动密集型企业(主要依靠劳动力的活动)还是资产密集型企业(主要依靠昂贵设备的活动)。因此,我将这种情况称为事实(间接)转让,因为它不是直接发生在转让方和受让方之间正式法律交易的基础上,而是实际上间接发生的,这取决于案件的情况和被转让的经济活动。鉴于这些欧盟法院的判例法的形式会导致显著的成本实际上义务接管工人和他们获得的权利受让人没有指望,本文的主要目的是确定事实的前提和主要特征(间接)转移的经济实体,保留其身份,并确定在什么情况下可能有义务接管工人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faktičan (neizravan) prijenos gospodarske cjeline i utjecaj na radnopravni položaj radnika
The transfer of undertakings, businesses or their parts, consequently leading to an ex lege transfer of an employment contract to the transferee as a new employer usually formally takes place on the basis of a direct legal transaction, usually directly between the transferor and the transferee, e.g. purchase, lease, or merger. However, in order to protect workers' rights, the case law of the Court of Justice has established that transfer may also occur in situations where there is no classical direct contractual relationship between the transferor and the transferee, but rather a third party's will (e.g. one company loses the right to provide a certain economic service and the other gains it), as a result of which the transferee actually continues to perform the economic activity that was previously performed by the transferor, provided that the subject of the transfer is an economic entity that retains its identity. In such situations, the safeguarding of workers' rights also depends on whether it is a labour-intensive business (an activity based mainly on the labour force) or asset-intensive business (an activity based mainly on expensive equipment). Therefore, I refer to this situation a factual (indirect) transfer, because it does not occur directly on the basis of a formal legal transaction between the transferor and the transferee, but in fact indirectly, depending on the circumstances of the case and the economic activity being transferred. Given that such case law of the Court of Justice of EU can result in a significant cost in the form of a de facto obligation to take over workers and their acquired rights that the transferee did not count on, the primary purpose of this paper is to identify the preconditions and the main features of the factual (indirect) transfer of an economic entity that retains its identity, and to pinpoint in what circumstances there may be an obligation to take over workers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信