多样化的研究团队:研究审查的框架

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Skye Akbar, Luke Greenacre, Rebecca Defina, Lorraine Garay
{"title":"多样化的研究团队:研究审查的框架","authors":"Skye Akbar, Luke Greenacre, Rebecca Defina, Lorraine Garay","doi":"10.1177/14707853221145845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous groups voices have often been missing from the marketing research collegiate. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of the land now known as Australia, for example, are among the most researched peoples in the world (Martin & Mirraboopa, 2003), yet are underrepresented among research practitioners. The present underrepresentation among practitioners is only slowly, and occasionally haphazardly, being addressed by the growing number of more junior Indigenous researchers entering the field. Until greater representation among senior researchers is achieved, research teams are likely to include a mixture of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers. Such teams must therefore address a unique combination of power imbalance and minority inclusion in how they work. This need for inclusion can become more challenging for research teams when the research topic addresses issues impacting Indigenous peoples. And while numerous ethical and research guidelines exist for how researchers work with participants who are members of a minority group and are likely to have less power, there are few frameworks addressing how such challenges should be managed for the researchers within a research team. In this paper, we use an action research method to critically reflect on how to manage research teams that include more junior Indigenous researchers whose voices are vital to the research project. Reflexive and proactive processes were developed to ensure a culture of reflection both regarding interactions within the research team and in the project. To structure and share these reflections, the team developed and enunciated a fit-for-purpose framework. This framework was informed by the work of Narungga Professor Rigney (1999) that lists foundational Indigenist research methods. The framework also draws on the layers of reflexivity proposed by Nicholls (2009) and insider/outsider group theory previously advocated for (Ameka, 2018).","PeriodicalId":47641,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Market Research","volume":"65 1","pages":"155 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diverse research teams: A framework for research review\",\"authors\":\"Skye Akbar, Luke Greenacre, Rebecca Defina, Lorraine Garay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14707853221145845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indigenous groups voices have often been missing from the marketing research collegiate. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of the land now known as Australia, for example, are among the most researched peoples in the world (Martin & Mirraboopa, 2003), yet are underrepresented among research practitioners. The present underrepresentation among practitioners is only slowly, and occasionally haphazardly, being addressed by the growing number of more junior Indigenous researchers entering the field. Until greater representation among senior researchers is achieved, research teams are likely to include a mixture of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers. Such teams must therefore address a unique combination of power imbalance and minority inclusion in how they work. This need for inclusion can become more challenging for research teams when the research topic addresses issues impacting Indigenous peoples. And while numerous ethical and research guidelines exist for how researchers work with participants who are members of a minority group and are likely to have less power, there are few frameworks addressing how such challenges should be managed for the researchers within a research team. In this paper, we use an action research method to critically reflect on how to manage research teams that include more junior Indigenous researchers whose voices are vital to the research project. Reflexive and proactive processes were developed to ensure a culture of reflection both regarding interactions within the research team and in the project. To structure and share these reflections, the team developed and enunciated a fit-for-purpose framework. This framework was informed by the work of Narungga Professor Rigney (1999) that lists foundational Indigenist research methods. The framework also draws on the layers of reflexivity proposed by Nicholls (2009) and insider/outsider group theory previously advocated for (Ameka, 2018).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Market Research\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Market Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853221145845\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853221145845","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

土著群体的声音经常在市场研究学院中消失。例如,现在被称为澳大利亚的土著和托雷斯海峡岛民是世界上研究最多的民族之一(Martin和Mirraboopa,2003),但在研究从业者中代表性不足。越来越多的初级土著研究人员进入该领域,解决了目前从业者代表性不足的问题。在高级研究人员中获得更大的代表性之前,研究团队可能包括土著和非土著研究人员。因此,这些团队必须在工作中解决权力失衡和少数群体包容的独特组合。当研究主题涉及影响土著人民的问题时,这种包容性需求对研究团队来说可能会变得更具挑战性。尽管研究人员如何与少数群体成员合作,并且可能权力较小,存在许多伦理和研究指南,但很少有框架解决研究团队中研究人员应如何应对这些挑战。在本文中,我们使用一种行动研究方法来批判性地反思如何管理研究团队,其中包括更多的初级土著研究人员,他们的声音对研究项目至关重要。制定了反思和积极主动的流程,以确保研究团队内部和项目中的互动都有反思文化。为了构建和分享这些思考,团队制定并阐述了一个符合目的的框架。该框架是由Narungga教授Rigney(1999)的工作提供的,该工作列出了靛蓝主义的基本研究方法。该框架还借鉴了Nicholls(2009)提出的反身性层次和之前倡导的内部/外部群体理论(Ameka,2018)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diverse research teams: A framework for research review
Indigenous groups voices have often been missing from the marketing research collegiate. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of the land now known as Australia, for example, are among the most researched peoples in the world (Martin & Mirraboopa, 2003), yet are underrepresented among research practitioners. The present underrepresentation among practitioners is only slowly, and occasionally haphazardly, being addressed by the growing number of more junior Indigenous researchers entering the field. Until greater representation among senior researchers is achieved, research teams are likely to include a mixture of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers. Such teams must therefore address a unique combination of power imbalance and minority inclusion in how they work. This need for inclusion can become more challenging for research teams when the research topic addresses issues impacting Indigenous peoples. And while numerous ethical and research guidelines exist for how researchers work with participants who are members of a minority group and are likely to have less power, there are few frameworks addressing how such challenges should be managed for the researchers within a research team. In this paper, we use an action research method to critically reflect on how to manage research teams that include more junior Indigenous researchers whose voices are vital to the research project. Reflexive and proactive processes were developed to ensure a culture of reflection both regarding interactions within the research team and in the project. To structure and share these reflections, the team developed and enunciated a fit-for-purpose framework. This framework was informed by the work of Narungga Professor Rigney (1999) that lists foundational Indigenist research methods. The framework also draws on the layers of reflexivity proposed by Nicholls (2009) and insider/outsider group theory previously advocated for (Ameka, 2018).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Market Research is the essential professional aid for users and providers of market research. IJMR will help you to: KEEP abreast of cutting-edge developments APPLY new research approaches to your business UNDERSTAND new tools and techniques LEARN from the world’s leading research thinkers STAY at the forefront of your profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信