法律作为关键制图:全球价值链、边界和脆弱性的空间化

Q2 Social Sciences
Peer C. Zumbansen
{"title":"法律作为关键制图:全球价值链、边界和脆弱性的空间化","authors":"Peer C. Zumbansen","doi":"10.1080/20414005.2023.2206760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How can law(yers) grasp spatialized regimes such as global value chains, surveillance infrastructures or platform-based information exchanges? How effective is ‘jurisdiction’ in capturing the border-crossing materiality which defines these expansive, socio-material regimes of power? This article suggests that accounts according to which the ‘transnationalization’ of legal orders is the most recent stage of ‘state transformation, are myopic, largely Western ones. Such narratives are inherently orientalizing and racializing as they invisibilize the dependency relationships between the Global North and the Global South. The dominant ‘globalization’ story that lawyers have been telling themselves paints the state as a victim – first of ‘privatization’ (and neoliberalism), then of financialization and globalization (and, of course ‘terrorism’). A more adequate map highlights the ‘upstairs-downstairs’ dynamic of subjugation and exploitation of the South by the North, a dynamic of which these regimes are a further manifestation.","PeriodicalId":37728,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Legal Theory","volume":"14 1","pages":"1 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law as critical cartography: global value chains, borders, and the spatialisation of vulnerability\",\"authors\":\"Peer C. Zumbansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20414005.2023.2206760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT How can law(yers) grasp spatialized regimes such as global value chains, surveillance infrastructures or platform-based information exchanges? How effective is ‘jurisdiction’ in capturing the border-crossing materiality which defines these expansive, socio-material regimes of power? This article suggests that accounts according to which the ‘transnationalization’ of legal orders is the most recent stage of ‘state transformation, are myopic, largely Western ones. Such narratives are inherently orientalizing and racializing as they invisibilize the dependency relationships between the Global North and the Global South. The dominant ‘globalization’ story that lawyers have been telling themselves paints the state as a victim – first of ‘privatization’ (and neoliberalism), then of financialization and globalization (and, of course ‘terrorism’). A more adequate map highlights the ‘upstairs-downstairs’ dynamic of subjugation and exploitation of the South by the North, a dynamic of which these regimes are a further manifestation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2023.2206760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Legal Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2023.2206760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:法律如何把握全球价值链、监控基础设施或基于平台的信息交换等空间化制度?“管辖权”在捕捉界定这些扩张的社会物质权力制度的跨境实质性方面的有效性如何?本文认为,法律秩序的“跨国化”是“国家转型”的最新阶段,这种说法是短视的,主要是西方的。这种叙事本质上是东方化和种族化的,因为它们掩盖了全球北方和全球南方之间的依赖关系。律师们一直在讲述的占主导地位的“全球化”故事将国家描绘成受害者——首先是“私有化”(和新自由主义),然后是金融化和全球化(当然还有“恐怖主义”)。一张更合适的地图突出了北方征服和剥削南方的“楼上楼下”动态,这些政权就是这种动态的进一步体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Law as critical cartography: global value chains, borders, and the spatialisation of vulnerability
ABSTRACT How can law(yers) grasp spatialized regimes such as global value chains, surveillance infrastructures or platform-based information exchanges? How effective is ‘jurisdiction’ in capturing the border-crossing materiality which defines these expansive, socio-material regimes of power? This article suggests that accounts according to which the ‘transnationalization’ of legal orders is the most recent stage of ‘state transformation, are myopic, largely Western ones. Such narratives are inherently orientalizing and racializing as they invisibilize the dependency relationships between the Global North and the Global South. The dominant ‘globalization’ story that lawyers have been telling themselves paints the state as a victim – first of ‘privatization’ (and neoliberalism), then of financialization and globalization (and, of course ‘terrorism’). A more adequate map highlights the ‘upstairs-downstairs’ dynamic of subjugation and exploitation of the South by the North, a dynamic of which these regimes are a further manifestation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transnational Legal Theory
Transnational Legal Theory Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The objective of Transnational Legal Theory is to publish high-quality theoretical scholarship that addresses transnational dimensions of law and legal dimensions of transnational fields and activity. Central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is publication of work that explores whether and how transnational contexts, forces and ideations affect debates within existing traditions or schools of legal thought. Similarly, the journal aspires to encourage scholars debating general theories about law to consider the relevance of transnational contexts and dimensions for their work. With respect to particular jurisprudence, the journal welcomes not only submissions that involve theoretical explorations of fields commonly constructed as transnational in nature (such as commercial law, maritime law, or cyberlaw) but also explorations of transnational aspects of fields less commonly understood in this way (for example, criminal law, family law, company law, tort law, evidence law, and so on). Submissions of work exploring process-oriented approaches to law as transnational (from transjurisdictional litigation to delocalized arbitration to multi-level governance) are also encouraged. Equally central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is theoretical work that explores fresh (or revived) understandings of international law and comparative law ''beyond the state'' (and the interstate). The journal has a special interest in submissions that explore the interfaces, intersections, and mutual embeddedness of public international law, private international law, and comparative law, notably in terms of whether such inter-relationships are reshaping these sub-disciplines in directions that are, in important respects, transnational in nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信