多学科护理模式的发展与参与行动研究在泰国曼谷心力衰竭诊所

IF 0.9 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Usasiri Srisakul, W. Umpornwirojkit, Supaporn Pattanasan, A. So-Ngern, Charlermsri Pummangura, S. Siwamogsatham
{"title":"多学科护理模式的发展与参与行动研究在泰国曼谷心力衰竭诊所","authors":"Usasiri Srisakul, W. Umpornwirojkit, Supaporn Pattanasan, A. So-Ngern, Charlermsri Pummangura, S. Siwamogsatham","doi":"10.56808/2586-940x.1051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Quality of care improvements is a challenge when resources are limited. In this participatory action research (PAR) study, we created a multidisciplinary care model (MCM) for heart failure clinic at a hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, and evaluated quality performance measures and clinical outcomes. Methods : Using the PAR framework, this study included: 1) identi fi cation of problems and planning solutions with providers, 2) development of the MCM, 3) implementation of the MCM, 4) evaluation of quality process and outcome measures among heart failure patients at the follow-up conducted 6 months after implementation of the MCM, and 5) post-MCM survey. Results : Information management of patient data, redundant work and communication, and ineffective work fl ow were the main problems identi fi ed. Providers suggested initiating a patient database, modifying the electronic health records, and developing an institutional map for heart failure care. Outcome measures were studied among 100 patients (mean age ¼ 61.92 years, SD ¼ 15.75; mean left ventricular ejection fraction ¼ 31.15%, SD ¼ 7.89). The mean guideline adherence indicator increased signi fi cantly (p ¼ 0.007) from baseline (87.50 ± 22.14%) to follow-up (94.50 ± 15.54%). At follow-up, there was a signi fi cant reduction for risk of heart failure hospitalization (RR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.652 to 0.889). Most study participants agreed that all MCM components could solve existing problems with heart failure care. Conclusion : The PAR strategy used to develop the MCM for this heart failure clinic with limited resources was feasible and led to quality-of-care improvements.","PeriodicalId":15935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of Multidisciplinary Care Model With Participatory Action Research for Heart Failure Clinic in Bangkok, Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Usasiri Srisakul, W. Umpornwirojkit, Supaporn Pattanasan, A. So-Ngern, Charlermsri Pummangura, S. Siwamogsatham\",\"doi\":\"10.56808/2586-940x.1051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : Quality of care improvements is a challenge when resources are limited. In this participatory action research (PAR) study, we created a multidisciplinary care model (MCM) for heart failure clinic at a hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, and evaluated quality performance measures and clinical outcomes. Methods : Using the PAR framework, this study included: 1) identi fi cation of problems and planning solutions with providers, 2) development of the MCM, 3) implementation of the MCM, 4) evaluation of quality process and outcome measures among heart failure patients at the follow-up conducted 6 months after implementation of the MCM, and 5) post-MCM survey. Results : Information management of patient data, redundant work and communication, and ineffective work fl ow were the main problems identi fi ed. Providers suggested initiating a patient database, modifying the electronic health records, and developing an institutional map for heart failure care. Outcome measures were studied among 100 patients (mean age ¼ 61.92 years, SD ¼ 15.75; mean left ventricular ejection fraction ¼ 31.15%, SD ¼ 7.89). The mean guideline adherence indicator increased signi fi cantly (p ¼ 0.007) from baseline (87.50 ± 22.14%) to follow-up (94.50 ± 15.54%). At follow-up, there was a signi fi cant reduction for risk of heart failure hospitalization (RR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.652 to 0.889). Most study participants agreed that all MCM components could solve existing problems with heart failure care. Conclusion : The PAR strategy used to develop the MCM for this heart failure clinic with limited resources was feasible and led to quality-of-care improvements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940x.1051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940x.1051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在资源有限的情况下,提高护理质量是一项挑战。在这项参与式行动研究(PAR)研究中,我们为泰国曼谷一家医院的心力衰竭诊所创建了一个多学科护理模型(MCM),并评估了质量绩效指标和临床结果。方法:采用PAR框架,本研究包括:1)与供应商识别问题并规划解决方案;2)MCM的制定;3)MCM的实施;4)在实施MCM后6个月对心力衰竭患者的质量过程和结果测量进行评估;5)MCM后调查。结果:患者数据的信息管理、冗余的工作和沟通以及无效的工作流程是确定的主要问题,提供者建议建立患者数据库,修改电子健康记录,并制定心力衰竭护理的机构地图。对100例患者(平均年龄61.92岁,SD 15.75;平均左室射血分数¼31.15%,SD¼7.89)。平均指南依从性指标从基线(87.50±22.14%)到随访(94.50±15.54%)显著增加(p¼0.007)。随访时,心衰住院风险显著降低(RR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.652 ~ 0.889)。大多数研究参与者同意所有MCM组件都可以解决心力衰竭护理中存在的问题。结论:PAR策略用于开发MCM的心力衰竭诊所有限的资源是可行的,并导致护理质量的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of Multidisciplinary Care Model With Participatory Action Research for Heart Failure Clinic in Bangkok, Thailand
Background : Quality of care improvements is a challenge when resources are limited. In this participatory action research (PAR) study, we created a multidisciplinary care model (MCM) for heart failure clinic at a hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, and evaluated quality performance measures and clinical outcomes. Methods : Using the PAR framework, this study included: 1) identi fi cation of problems and planning solutions with providers, 2) development of the MCM, 3) implementation of the MCM, 4) evaluation of quality process and outcome measures among heart failure patients at the follow-up conducted 6 months after implementation of the MCM, and 5) post-MCM survey. Results : Information management of patient data, redundant work and communication, and ineffective work fl ow were the main problems identi fi ed. Providers suggested initiating a patient database, modifying the electronic health records, and developing an institutional map for heart failure care. Outcome measures were studied among 100 patients (mean age ¼ 61.92 years, SD ¼ 15.75; mean left ventricular ejection fraction ¼ 31.15%, SD ¼ 7.89). The mean guideline adherence indicator increased signi fi cantly (p ¼ 0.007) from baseline (87.50 ± 22.14%) to follow-up (94.50 ± 15.54%). At follow-up, there was a signi fi cant reduction for risk of heart failure hospitalization (RR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.652 to 0.889). Most study participants agreed that all MCM components could solve existing problems with heart failure care. Conclusion : The PAR strategy used to develop the MCM for this heart failure clinic with limited resources was feasible and led to quality-of-care improvements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Research
Journal of Health Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信