Laura M. Gerritsen , Henk Scheper , Mark G.J. de Boer , Jan W. Schoones , Rob G.H.H. Nelissen , Bart G.C. Pijls
{"title":"清创、抗生素和植入物保留治疗链球菌性髋关节和膝关节假体感染的结果:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Laura M. Gerritsen , Henk Scheper , Mark G.J. de Boer , Jan W. Schoones , Rob G.H.H. Nelissen , Bart G.C. Pijls","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PROSPERO registration ID</h3><p>367411</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the outcome of streptococcal hip and knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) and to evaluate risk factors associated with failure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library from inception until October 2021. Random effects meta-analyses (i.e. relative risk) were used to estimate the success rate at the study level and its association with possible risk factors for failure with a specific focus on the use of rifampicin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>25 observational studies were included, incorporating 1367 patients with streptococcal PJIs treated with DAIR. An overall pooled success rate of 71% (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 64–77%) was found for streptococcal PJI treated with DAIR. Treatment success was 76% (95%CI 62% to 91%) for knee PJI and 58% (95%CI 52% to 65%) for hip PJI. Treatment success differed for patients receiving rifampicin (84%, 95% CI 78% to 90%) compared to patients not receiving rifampicin (74%, 95% CI 63% to 85%), but this effect was no longer present in subsequent meta-analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The meta-analysis showed no clear benefit for rifampicin administration after DAIR for streptococcal PJI. Better outcome was observed for knee PJI compared to hip PJI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for streptococcal hip and knee prosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Laura M. Gerritsen , Henk Scheper , Mark G.J. de Boer , Jan W. Schoones , Rob G.H.H. Nelissen , Bart G.C. Pijls\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>PROSPERO registration ID</h3><p>367411</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the outcome of streptococcal hip and knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) and to evaluate risk factors associated with failure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library from inception until October 2021. Random effects meta-analyses (i.e. relative risk) were used to estimate the success rate at the study level and its association with possible risk factors for failure with a specific focus on the use of rifampicin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>25 observational studies were included, incorporating 1367 patients with streptococcal PJIs treated with DAIR. An overall pooled success rate of 71% (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 64–77%) was found for streptococcal PJI treated with DAIR. Treatment success was 76% (95%CI 62% to 91%) for knee PJI and 58% (95%CI 52% to 65%) for hip PJI. Treatment success differed for patients receiving rifampicin (84%, 95% CI 78% to 90%) compared to patients not receiving rifampicin (74%, 95% CI 63% to 85%), but this effect was no longer present in subsequent meta-analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The meta-analysis showed no clear benefit for rifampicin administration after DAIR for streptococcal PJI. Better outcome was observed for knee PJI compared to hip PJI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在评估清创、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)治疗链球菌性髋关节和膝关节假体感染(PJI)的结果,并评估失败的相关危险因素。方法系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆自成立至2021年10月的文献。随机效应荟萃分析(即相对风险)用于估计研究水平的成功率及其与可能的失败风险因素的关联,并特别关注利福平的使用。结果纳入25项观察性研究,纳入1367例接受DAIR治疗的链球菌性PJIs患者。DAIR治疗链球菌性PJI的总成功率为71%(95%可信区间(95% ci) 64-77%)。膝关节PJI的治疗成功率为76% (95%CI 62% ~ 91%),髋关节PJI的治疗成功率为58% (95%CI 52% ~ 65%)。接受利福平治疗的患者(84%,95% CI 78% - 90%)与未接受利福平治疗的患者(74%,95% CI 63% - 85%)的治疗成功率不同,但在随后的荟萃分析中不再存在这种影响。结论荟萃分析显示,DAIR后利福平治疗链球菌PJI没有明显的益处。与髋关节PJI相比,膝关节PJI的疗效更好。
Outcome of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for streptococcal hip and knee prosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
PROSPERO registration ID
367411
Objectives
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the outcome of streptococcal hip and knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) and to evaluate risk factors associated with failure.
Methods
We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library from inception until October 2021. Random effects meta-analyses (i.e. relative risk) were used to estimate the success rate at the study level and its association with possible risk factors for failure with a specific focus on the use of rifampicin.
Results
25 observational studies were included, incorporating 1367 patients with streptococcal PJIs treated with DAIR. An overall pooled success rate of 71% (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 64–77%) was found for streptococcal PJI treated with DAIR. Treatment success was 76% (95%CI 62% to 91%) for knee PJI and 58% (95%CI 52% to 65%) for hip PJI. Treatment success differed for patients receiving rifampicin (84%, 95% CI 78% to 90%) compared to patients not receiving rifampicin (74%, 95% CI 63% to 85%), but this effect was no longer present in subsequent meta-analyses.
Conclusions
The meta-analysis showed no clear benefit for rifampicin administration after DAIR for streptococcal PJI. Better outcome was observed for knee PJI compared to hip PJI.