迈向共同的封城做法:对近东救济工程处和难民署至1967年的历史调查

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
L. Robson
{"title":"迈向共同的封城做法:对近东救济工程处和难民署至1967年的历史调查","authors":"L. Robson","doi":"10.1093/jrs/fead045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article reconsiders refugee studies’ longstanding commitment to the notion of a near-total separation between the UNHCR and UNRWA through an historical investigation of both organizations’ early approaches to refugee encampment. Without disputing the importance of the historical and institutional divisions between the two, it seeks to point out that with respect to the practice of encampment, the two agencies gradually drew nearer to each other during their first two decades of operation, as the UNHCR extended its reach into the decolonizing world and UNRWA expanded its operations across the Middle East. The parallels became particularly clear in 1967, when the ‘Protocol on the Status of Refugees’ formalized the UNHCR’s encampment-focused expansion into the decolonizing world at roughly the same time that the second Arab-Israeli war created the conditions for UNRWA to enshrine encampment as a more or less permanent institutional strategy.","PeriodicalId":51464,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Refugee Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Shared Practice of Encampment: An Historical Investigation of UNRWA and the UNHCR to 1967\",\"authors\":\"L. Robson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrs/fead045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article reconsiders refugee studies’ longstanding commitment to the notion of a near-total separation between the UNHCR and UNRWA through an historical investigation of both organizations’ early approaches to refugee encampment. Without disputing the importance of the historical and institutional divisions between the two, it seeks to point out that with respect to the practice of encampment, the two agencies gradually drew nearer to each other during their first two decades of operation, as the UNHCR extended its reach into the decolonizing world and UNRWA expanded its operations across the Middle East. The parallels became particularly clear in 1967, when the ‘Protocol on the Status of Refugees’ formalized the UNHCR’s encampment-focused expansion into the decolonizing world at roughly the same time that the second Arab-Israeli war created the conditions for UNRWA to enshrine encampment as a more or less permanent institutional strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Refugee Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Refugee Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fead045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Refugee Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fead045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对难民署和近东救济工程处早期难民安置方法的历史调查,重新考虑了难民研究长期以来对难民署与近东救济工程处在近乎完全分离的概念的承诺。在不争论两者之间历史和机构分歧的重要性的情况下,它试图指出,在进驻营地的做法方面,随着难民专员办事处将其触角扩展到非殖民化世界,近东救济工程处将其业务扩展到整个中东,这两个机构在其运作的头二十年中逐渐拉近了距离。这种相似之处在1967年变得尤为明显,当时《难民地位议定书》正式确定了难民署以营地为重点向非殖民化世界的扩张,而与此同时,第二次阿以战争为近东救济工程处将营地作为一项或多或少永久性的机构战略创造了条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a Shared Practice of Encampment: An Historical Investigation of UNRWA and the UNHCR to 1967
This article reconsiders refugee studies’ longstanding commitment to the notion of a near-total separation between the UNHCR and UNRWA through an historical investigation of both organizations’ early approaches to refugee encampment. Without disputing the importance of the historical and institutional divisions between the two, it seeks to point out that with respect to the practice of encampment, the two agencies gradually drew nearer to each other during their first two decades of operation, as the UNHCR extended its reach into the decolonizing world and UNRWA expanded its operations across the Middle East. The parallels became particularly clear in 1967, when the ‘Protocol on the Status of Refugees’ formalized the UNHCR’s encampment-focused expansion into the decolonizing world at roughly the same time that the second Arab-Israeli war created the conditions for UNRWA to enshrine encampment as a more or less permanent institutional strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Journal of Refugee Studies provides a forum for exploration of the complex problems of forced migration and national, regional and international responses. The Journal covers all categories of forcibly displaced people. Contributions that develop theoretical understandings of forced migration, or advance knowledge of concepts, policies and practice are welcomed from both academics and practitioners. Journal of Refugee Studies is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, and is published in association with the Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信