卢克莱修《自然论》中的厌恶美学

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1086/721538
Rebecca Moorman
{"title":"卢克莱修《自然论》中的厌恶美学","authors":"Rebecca Moorman","doi":"10.1086/721538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the plague in Lucretius’ De rerum natura facilitates an aesthetic experience founded on disgust that is distinct from the sublime, or the notion of aesthetic fear more regularly recognized in Book 6. Fear and disgust each respond to a different kind of death—sudden demise or slow decay—and a different aesthetic category is needed to describe the reader’s experience of overcoming each form of death. The reader’s ability to derive positive pleasure from the plague is a culmination of the philosophical education for which the poet has been preparing his audience throughout De rerum natura.","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Aesthetics of Disgust in Lucretius’ De rerum natura\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Moorman\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that the plague in Lucretius’ De rerum natura facilitates an aesthetic experience founded on disgust that is distinct from the sublime, or the notion of aesthetic fear more regularly recognized in Book 6. Fear and disgust each respond to a different kind of death—sudden demise or slow decay—and a different aesthetic category is needed to describe the reader’s experience of overcoming each form of death. The reader’s ability to derive positive pleasure from the plague is a culmination of the philosophical education for which the poet has been preparing his audience throughout De rerum natura.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721538\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,卢克莱修的《自然之歌》中的瘟疫促进了一种建立在厌恶之上的审美体验,这种体验不同于崇高,也不同于第6卷中更常见的审美恐惧概念。恐惧和厌恶都会对不同类型的死亡做出反应——突然死亡或缓慢衰退——需要一个不同的美学类别来描述读者克服每种死亡形式的经历。读者从瘟疫中获得积极快乐的能力是诗人在《自然之歌》中为观众准备的哲学教育的高潮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Aesthetics of Disgust in Lucretius’ De rerum natura
This paper argues that the plague in Lucretius’ De rerum natura facilitates an aesthetic experience founded on disgust that is distinct from the sublime, or the notion of aesthetic fear more regularly recognized in Book 6. Fear and disgust each respond to a different kind of death—sudden demise or slow decay—and a different aesthetic category is needed to describe the reader’s experience of overcoming each form of death. The reader’s ability to derive positive pleasure from the plague is a culmination of the philosophical education for which the poet has been preparing his audience throughout De rerum natura.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信