处方药标签与标签格式和内容建议的一致性

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yeow Boon Oh BSc (Pharm) (Hons), Sumithra Devi Suppiah BSc, MPharm, Deborah Miao-Hui Chia BSc (Pharm) (Hons), MClin Pharm, BCGP, Yi Wen Tan BSocSci, Rahul Malhotra MBBS, MD, MPH
{"title":"处方药标签与标签格式和内容建议的一致性","authors":"Yeow Boon Oh BSc (Pharm) (Hons),&nbsp;Sumithra Devi Suppiah BSc, MPharm,&nbsp;Deborah Miao-Hui Chia BSc (Pharm) (Hons), MClin Pharm, BCGP,&nbsp;Yi Wen Tan BSocSci,&nbsp;Rahul Malhotra MBBS, MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Prescription medication labels (PMLs) are central in guiding patients to use their medications appropriately. For PMLs to achieve this purpose, their content must enable medication use as desired and be presented in a clear and legible manner.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study assesses the extent to which the format and content of PMLs used in Singapore meet national and/or international recommendations, and if the extent varies across public and private healthcare institutions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The format and content variables of 113 PMLs were compared against published recommendations. Variability in the extent to which the format and content of PMLs met the recommendations across public and private institutions was assessed through the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Less than 50% of the PMLs conformed with the format recommendations of printing instructions in sentence case (35.4%), and the content recommendations for providing drug–food administration instructions (45.3%), using specific dosing intervals for dosing instructions (21.2%), providing an expiry date (17.7%), and generating bilingual labels (5.3%). A higher proportion of private institution PMLs followed the format recommendations of printing instructions in sentence case (p = 0.004) and numeric characters for quantitative values (p = 0.003), and the content recommendations for providing drug indication (p &lt; 0.001). In contrast, a higher proportion of public institution PMLs followed the content recommendations of using specific dosing intervals (p = 0.001), providing side effects/precautions (p = 0.003), and providing drug-food administration instructions (p = 0.021).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There is definite scope for improving the format and content of PMLs in Singapore. Future studies could explore the possible logistical, financial, and administrative reasons that contribute to PML variability across healthcare institutions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"52 6","pages":"427-437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conformity of prescription medication labels with label format and content recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Yeow Boon Oh BSc (Pharm) (Hons),&nbsp;Sumithra Devi Suppiah BSc, MPharm,&nbsp;Deborah Miao-Hui Chia BSc (Pharm) (Hons), MClin Pharm, BCGP,&nbsp;Yi Wen Tan BSocSci,&nbsp;Rahul Malhotra MBBS, MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.1824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prescription medication labels (PMLs) are central in guiding patients to use their medications appropriately. For PMLs to achieve this purpose, their content must enable medication use as desired and be presented in a clear and legible manner.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study assesses the extent to which the format and content of PMLs used in Singapore meet national and/or international recommendations, and if the extent varies across public and private healthcare institutions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The format and content variables of 113 PMLs were compared against published recommendations. Variability in the extent to which the format and content of PMLs met the recommendations across public and private institutions was assessed through the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Less than 50% of the PMLs conformed with the format recommendations of printing instructions in sentence case (35.4%), and the content recommendations for providing drug–food administration instructions (45.3%), using specific dosing intervals for dosing instructions (21.2%), providing an expiry date (17.7%), and generating bilingual labels (5.3%). A higher proportion of private institution PMLs followed the format recommendations of printing instructions in sentence case (p = 0.004) and numeric characters for quantitative values (p = 0.003), and the content recommendations for providing drug indication (p &lt; 0.001). In contrast, a higher proportion of public institution PMLs followed the content recommendations of using specific dosing intervals (p = 0.001), providing side effects/precautions (p = 0.003), and providing drug-food administration instructions (p = 0.021).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is definite scope for improving the format and content of PMLs in Singapore. Future studies could explore the possible logistical, financial, and administrative reasons that contribute to PML variability across healthcare institutions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"427-437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

处方药物标签(pml)是指导患者正确使用药物的核心。为了实现这一目的,pml的内容必须使药物使用成为可能,并以清晰易读的方式呈现。目的本研究评估新加坡使用的pml的格式和内容在多大程度上符合国家和/或国际建议,以及公立和私立医疗机构之间的程度是否不同。方法将113份pml的格式和内容变量与已发表的建议进行比较。通过卡方检验或Fisher精确检验来评估pml的格式和内容在多大程度上符合公立和私立机构的建议。结果符合句子case中印刷说明书格式建议(35.4%)的pml不到50%,符合药品食品使用说明书内容建议(45.3%)、给药说明书使用特定给药间隔(21.2%)、提供有效期(17.7%)和生成双语标签(5.3%)的pml不到50%。较高比例的私立医疗机构pml采用句子大小写格式(p = 0.004)和定量值数字字符格式(p = 0.003),以及提供药物指证的内容建议(p < 0.001)。相比之下,较高比例的公共机构pml遵循了使用特定给药间隔(p = 0.001)、提供副作用/注意事项(p = 0.003)和提供药物-食品给药说明(p = 0.021)的内容建议。结论新加坡pml的格式和内容有一定的改进空间。未来的研究可以探索可能的后勤、财务和行政原因,导致PML在医疗机构之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conformity of prescription medication labels with label format and content recommendations

Background

Prescription medication labels (PMLs) are central in guiding patients to use their medications appropriately. For PMLs to achieve this purpose, their content must enable medication use as desired and be presented in a clear and legible manner.

Aim

This study assesses the extent to which the format and content of PMLs used in Singapore meet national and/or international recommendations, and if the extent varies across public and private healthcare institutions.

Method

The format and content variables of 113 PMLs were compared against published recommendations. Variability in the extent to which the format and content of PMLs met the recommendations across public and private institutions was assessed through the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results

Less than 50% of the PMLs conformed with the format recommendations of printing instructions in sentence case (35.4%), and the content recommendations for providing drug–food administration instructions (45.3%), using specific dosing intervals for dosing instructions (21.2%), providing an expiry date (17.7%), and generating bilingual labels (5.3%). A higher proportion of private institution PMLs followed the format recommendations of printing instructions in sentence case (p = 0.004) and numeric characters for quantitative values (p = 0.003), and the content recommendations for providing drug indication (p < 0.001). In contrast, a higher proportion of public institution PMLs followed the content recommendations of using specific dosing intervals (p = 0.001), providing side effects/precautions (p = 0.003), and providing drug-food administration instructions (p = 0.021).

Conclusion

There is definite scope for improving the format and content of PMLs in Singapore. Future studies could explore the possible logistical, financial, and administrative reasons that contribute to PML variability across healthcare institutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信