{"title":"对布拉格战役和马德里波希米亚起义的看法","authors":"Ondřej Lee Stolička","doi":"10.14712/24647063.2021.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text presents two different views on the problems with the Bohemian revolt and the Battle of the White Mountain (1620). The analysis of the Spanish perception (for example, the Spanish ambassador Oñate, members of the State Council, and Spanish King) described the conflict as a broader problem, which could lead to a loss of the Habsburg’s lands in Central Europe. In contrast, the Bohemian point understood the revolt in Prague as a danger to the position of the Catholic nobility in Bohemia.","PeriodicalId":53013,"journal":{"name":"IberoAmericana Pragensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La percepción de la batalla de Praga y revolta bohemia en Madrid\",\"authors\":\"Ondřej Lee Stolička\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/24647063.2021.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The text presents two different views on the problems with the Bohemian revolt and the Battle of the White Mountain (1620). The analysis of the Spanish perception (for example, the Spanish ambassador Oñate, members of the State Council, and Spanish King) described the conflict as a broader problem, which could lead to a loss of the Habsburg’s lands in Central Europe. In contrast, the Bohemian point understood the revolt in Prague as a danger to the position of the Catholic nobility in Bohemia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IberoAmericana Pragensia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IberoAmericana Pragensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/24647063.2021.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IberoAmericana Pragensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/24647063.2021.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
La percepción de la batalla de Praga y revolta bohemia en Madrid
The text presents two different views on the problems with the Bohemian revolt and the Battle of the White Mountain (1620). The analysis of the Spanish perception (for example, the Spanish ambassador Oñate, members of the State Council, and Spanish King) described the conflict as a broader problem, which could lead to a loss of the Habsburg’s lands in Central Europe. In contrast, the Bohemian point understood the revolt in Prague as a danger to the position of the Catholic nobility in Bohemia.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
