超越大国:实现弹性多边主义的中间大国之路

Q3 Arts and Humanities
A. Park
{"title":"超越大国:实现弹性多边主义的中间大国之路","authors":"A. Park","doi":"10.18588/202205.00a274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Set amidst growing global challenges and great power politics, this article asks how middle powers might best promote global collective action. Adopting a historical approach, it explores four case studies on middle power multilateralism in (1) post-1974 UN New International Economic Order;(2) post-1989 Bretton Woods institutions;(3) post-1992 European Union expansion;and (4) post-2003 UN SouthSouth cooperation. These inform a policy framework and an ensuing alternative termed \"resilient multilateralism.\" Adopting a foreign policy standpoint, this alternative entails principles on context specificity, complementarity, consensus building, and non-confrontation. By opening space for global action, it offers a timely approach to countering future shocks and coordination failures-whether wrought through nature or through hands of our own.","PeriodicalId":37030,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Peacebuilding","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Great Powers: Middle Power Paths to Resilient Multilateralism\",\"authors\":\"A. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.18588/202205.00a274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Set amidst growing global challenges and great power politics, this article asks how middle powers might best promote global collective action. Adopting a historical approach, it explores four case studies on middle power multilateralism in (1) post-1974 UN New International Economic Order;(2) post-1989 Bretton Woods institutions;(3) post-1992 European Union expansion;and (4) post-2003 UN SouthSouth cooperation. These inform a policy framework and an ensuing alternative termed \\\"resilient multilateralism.\\\" Adopting a foreign policy standpoint, this alternative entails principles on context specificity, complementarity, consensus building, and non-confrontation. By opening space for global action, it offers a timely approach to countering future shocks and coordination failures-whether wrought through nature or through hands of our own.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Peacebuilding\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Peacebuilding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18588/202205.00a274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Peacebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18588/202205.00a274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文以日益增长的全球挑战和大国政治为背景,探讨了中间大国如何最好地促进全球集体行动。采用历史的方法,探讨了1974年后联合国新国际经济秩序中的四个中等大国多边主义案例;(2) 1989年后布雷顿森林机构;(3) 1992年后欧洲联盟扩大;以及(4)2003年后联合国南南合作。这些为政策框架和随后的一种称为“弹性多边主义”的替代方案提供了信息。从外交政策的角度来看,这种替代方案包含了特定背景、互补性、建立共识和不对抗的原则。通过为全球行动开辟空间,它为应对未来的冲击和协调失败提供了一种及时的方法,无论是由自然还是我们自己造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Great Powers: Middle Power Paths to Resilient Multilateralism
Set amidst growing global challenges and great power politics, this article asks how middle powers might best promote global collective action. Adopting a historical approach, it explores four case studies on middle power multilateralism in (1) post-1974 UN New International Economic Order;(2) post-1989 Bretton Woods institutions;(3) post-1992 European Union expansion;and (4) post-2003 UN SouthSouth cooperation. These inform a policy framework and an ensuing alternative termed "resilient multilateralism." Adopting a foreign policy standpoint, this alternative entails principles on context specificity, complementarity, consensus building, and non-confrontation. By opening space for global action, it offers a timely approach to countering future shocks and coordination failures-whether wrought through nature or through hands of our own.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Peacebuilding
Asian Journal of Peacebuilding Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信