{"title":"超越大国:实现弹性多边主义的中间大国之路","authors":"A. Park","doi":"10.18588/202205.00a274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Set amidst growing global challenges and great power politics, this article asks how middle powers might best promote global collective action. Adopting a historical approach, it explores four case studies on middle power multilateralism in (1) post-1974 UN New International Economic Order;(2) post-1989 Bretton Woods institutions;(3) post-1992 European Union expansion;and (4) post-2003 UN SouthSouth cooperation. These inform a policy framework and an ensuing alternative termed \"resilient multilateralism.\" Adopting a foreign policy standpoint, this alternative entails principles on context specificity, complementarity, consensus building, and non-confrontation. By opening space for global action, it offers a timely approach to countering future shocks and coordination failures-whether wrought through nature or through hands of our own.","PeriodicalId":37030,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Peacebuilding","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Great Powers: Middle Power Paths to Resilient Multilateralism\",\"authors\":\"A. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.18588/202205.00a274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Set amidst growing global challenges and great power politics, this article asks how middle powers might best promote global collective action. Adopting a historical approach, it explores four case studies on middle power multilateralism in (1) post-1974 UN New International Economic Order;(2) post-1989 Bretton Woods institutions;(3) post-1992 European Union expansion;and (4) post-2003 UN SouthSouth cooperation. These inform a policy framework and an ensuing alternative termed \\\"resilient multilateralism.\\\" Adopting a foreign policy standpoint, this alternative entails principles on context specificity, complementarity, consensus building, and non-confrontation. By opening space for global action, it offers a timely approach to countering future shocks and coordination failures-whether wrought through nature or through hands of our own.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Peacebuilding\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Peacebuilding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18588/202205.00a274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Peacebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18588/202205.00a274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond Great Powers: Middle Power Paths to Resilient Multilateralism
Set amidst growing global challenges and great power politics, this article asks how middle powers might best promote global collective action. Adopting a historical approach, it explores four case studies on middle power multilateralism in (1) post-1974 UN New International Economic Order;(2) post-1989 Bretton Woods institutions;(3) post-1992 European Union expansion;and (4) post-2003 UN SouthSouth cooperation. These inform a policy framework and an ensuing alternative termed "resilient multilateralism." Adopting a foreign policy standpoint, this alternative entails principles on context specificity, complementarity, consensus building, and non-confrontation. By opening space for global action, it offers a timely approach to countering future shocks and coordination failures-whether wrought through nature or through hands of our own.