I. Romash, V. Neyko, I. Romash, Kateryna Dzivak, P. Gerych, Mykhaylo Panchyshyn, O. Gerych, Mykhaylo Pustovoyt
{"title":"创伤后应激障碍作为一个疾病学单位:过去的困难和未来的挑战","authors":"I. Romash, V. Neyko, I. Romash, Kateryna Dzivak, P. Gerych, Mykhaylo Panchyshyn, O. Gerych, Mykhaylo Pustovoyt","doi":"10.33120/sssppj.vi50(53).596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The impact of traumatic experiences has always been a part of human life. According to Judith Herman, an American psychotherapist, and professor at Harvard Medical School, \"traumatic events overload a person's usual strategies for adapting to life, his usual security systems that give a sense of control, connection, and meaning.\" Also, traumatic events, for the most part, contain close personal contact with violence and death and pose a threat to life or physical integrity. For almost one year of the war, Ukrainian society faced a large number of negative phenomena capable of causing severe psychological trauma: disruption of the usual lifestyle, loss of family friends, and property, lack of many vital needs for a person, forced migration, uncertainty, a constant threat for health and life, etc. \nThe purpose of the study was to analysis of scientific and literary data reflecting the history of the formation of the concept of \"post-traumatic stress disorder\" as a nosological unit, as well as the peculiarities of its manifestation and prevalence, diagnostic criteria. \nMaterials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in the main electronic medical databases, such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and processed publications that studied the history of the formation of \"post-traumatic stress disorder\" as a nosological unit, the features of its manifestation and prevalence. diagnostic criteria. Eligible studies were identified using keywords: post-traumatic stress disorder, psychotraumatology, trauma, physioneurosis, history of medicine. All types of articles were reviewed, including original studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. \nReview and discussion: For a long time, there was a stigmatization of combat-related disorders in society. The path to the development of PTSD as a psychiatric diagnosis is long and thorny. After the World War II, there was an urgent need to introduce a standard unified nomenclature that would enable doctors from all over the world to have a common language for discussing the psychopathology of this disorder, establishing a diagnosis and determining disability. Over 60 years, starting in 1952, when the American Psychiatric Association (APA) introduced the concept of \"brutal stress reaction\" in its first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) and up to 2013 (DSM-5) formation of post-traumatic stress disorder as a nosological unit was taking place. \nConclusions: Despite the non-acceptance, stigmatization, indifference and other difficulties, PTSD finally achieved official status in the recognized list of diagnoses. \n ","PeriodicalId":33814,"journal":{"name":"Naukovi studiyi iz sotsial''noyi ta politichnoyi psikhologiyi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-traumatic stress disorder as a nosological unit: difficulties of the past and challenges of the future\",\"authors\":\"I. Romash, V. Neyko, I. Romash, Kateryna Dzivak, P. Gerych, Mykhaylo Panchyshyn, O. Gerych, Mykhaylo Pustovoyt\",\"doi\":\"10.33120/sssppj.vi50(53).596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The impact of traumatic experiences has always been a part of human life. According to Judith Herman, an American psychotherapist, and professor at Harvard Medical School, \\\"traumatic events overload a person's usual strategies for adapting to life, his usual security systems that give a sense of control, connection, and meaning.\\\" Also, traumatic events, for the most part, contain close personal contact with violence and death and pose a threat to life or physical integrity. For almost one year of the war, Ukrainian society faced a large number of negative phenomena capable of causing severe psychological trauma: disruption of the usual lifestyle, loss of family friends, and property, lack of many vital needs for a person, forced migration, uncertainty, a constant threat for health and life, etc. \\nThe purpose of the study was to analysis of scientific and literary data reflecting the history of the formation of the concept of \\\"post-traumatic stress disorder\\\" as a nosological unit, as well as the peculiarities of its manifestation and prevalence, diagnostic criteria. \\nMaterials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in the main electronic medical databases, such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and processed publications that studied the history of the formation of \\\"post-traumatic stress disorder\\\" as a nosological unit, the features of its manifestation and prevalence. diagnostic criteria. Eligible studies were identified using keywords: post-traumatic stress disorder, psychotraumatology, trauma, physioneurosis, history of medicine. All types of articles were reviewed, including original studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. \\nReview and discussion: For a long time, there was a stigmatization of combat-related disorders in society. The path to the development of PTSD as a psychiatric diagnosis is long and thorny. After the World War II, there was an urgent need to introduce a standard unified nomenclature that would enable doctors from all over the world to have a common language for discussing the psychopathology of this disorder, establishing a diagnosis and determining disability. Over 60 years, starting in 1952, when the American Psychiatric Association (APA) introduced the concept of \\\"brutal stress reaction\\\" in its first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) and up to 2013 (DSM-5) formation of post-traumatic stress disorder as a nosological unit was taking place. \\nConclusions: Despite the non-acceptance, stigmatization, indifference and other difficulties, PTSD finally achieved official status in the recognized list of diagnoses. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":33814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naukovi studiyi iz sotsial''noyi ta politichnoyi psikhologiyi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naukovi studiyi iz sotsial''noyi ta politichnoyi psikhologiyi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33120/sssppj.vi50(53).596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovi studiyi iz sotsial''noyi ta politichnoyi psikhologiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33120/sssppj.vi50(53).596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
介绍创伤经历的影响一直是人类生活的一部分。根据美国心理治疗师、哈佛医学院教授朱迪斯·赫尔曼的说法,“创伤事件使一个人适应生活的常规策略、他通常的安全系统过载,这些系统会给人一种控制感、联系感和意义感。”,包含与暴力和死亡的密切个人接触,并对生命或身体完整构成威胁。在战争的近一年里,乌克兰社会面临着大量可能造成严重心理创伤的负面现象:日常生活方式中断、失去家人朋友和财产、缺乏对个人的许多重要需求、被迫移民、不确定性、对健康和生命的持续威胁等。该研究的目的是分析科学和文学数据,这些数据反映了“创伤后应激障碍”作为一个疾病学单位的概念形成的历史,以及其表现形式和流行率的特点、诊断标准。材料和方法:在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Google Scholar等主要电子医学数据库中进行系统搜索,并对研究“创伤后应激障碍”作为一个疾病学单元的形成历史、表现形式和流行特征的出版物进行处理。诊断标准。符合条件的研究使用关键词确定:创伤后应激障碍、精神创伤学、创伤、生理神经症、病史。对所有类型的文章进行了综述,包括原始研究、系统综述和荟萃分析。回顾和讨论:长期以来,社会上存在着对与战斗有关的障碍的污名化。创伤后应激障碍作为一种精神病诊断的发展道路是漫长而棘手的。第二次世界大战后,迫切需要引入一个标准的统一命名法,使世界各地的医生能够有一种共同的语言来讨论这种疾病的精神病理学,建立诊断和确定残疾。60多年来,从1952年开始,美国精神病学会(APA)在其第一版《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-I)中引入了“残酷的应激反应”的概念,到2013年(DSM-5),创伤后应激障碍作为一个疾病学单位的形成正在发生。结论:尽管存在不被接受、污名化、冷漠和其他困难,创伤后应激障碍最终在公认的诊断列表中获得了官方地位。
Post-traumatic stress disorder as a nosological unit: difficulties of the past and challenges of the future
Introduction. The impact of traumatic experiences has always been a part of human life. According to Judith Herman, an American psychotherapist, and professor at Harvard Medical School, "traumatic events overload a person's usual strategies for adapting to life, his usual security systems that give a sense of control, connection, and meaning." Also, traumatic events, for the most part, contain close personal contact with violence and death and pose a threat to life or physical integrity. For almost one year of the war, Ukrainian society faced a large number of negative phenomena capable of causing severe psychological trauma: disruption of the usual lifestyle, loss of family friends, and property, lack of many vital needs for a person, forced migration, uncertainty, a constant threat for health and life, etc.
The purpose of the study was to analysis of scientific and literary data reflecting the history of the formation of the concept of "post-traumatic stress disorder" as a nosological unit, as well as the peculiarities of its manifestation and prevalence, diagnostic criteria.
Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in the main electronic medical databases, such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and processed publications that studied the history of the formation of "post-traumatic stress disorder" as a nosological unit, the features of its manifestation and prevalence. diagnostic criteria. Eligible studies were identified using keywords: post-traumatic stress disorder, psychotraumatology, trauma, physioneurosis, history of medicine. All types of articles were reviewed, including original studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
Review and discussion: For a long time, there was a stigmatization of combat-related disorders in society. The path to the development of PTSD as a psychiatric diagnosis is long and thorny. After the World War II, there was an urgent need to introduce a standard unified nomenclature that would enable doctors from all over the world to have a common language for discussing the psychopathology of this disorder, establishing a diagnosis and determining disability. Over 60 years, starting in 1952, when the American Psychiatric Association (APA) introduced the concept of "brutal stress reaction" in its first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) and up to 2013 (DSM-5) formation of post-traumatic stress disorder as a nosological unit was taking place.
Conclusions: Despite the non-acceptance, stigmatization, indifference and other difficulties, PTSD finally achieved official status in the recognized list of diagnoses.