有复杂沟通需求的成年人的增强和替代沟通：个案研究综述

IF 0.7 4区医学 Q4 REHABILITATION

Communication Disorders Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-02-15 DOI:10.1177/1525740121991478

Natalie R. Andzik, Yun-Ching Chung

{"title":"有复杂沟通需求的成年人的增强和替代沟通：个案研究综述","authors":"Natalie R. Andzik, Yun-Ching Chung","doi":"10.1177/1525740121991478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, including studies that used a single-case design (SCD) and taught augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) use to adults with complex communication needs. The purpose of this review was to describe (a) adults receiving AAC intervention, (b) components of the interventions used, and (c) how the literature met quality standards set by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). Across the 12 SCD studies included, a total of 28 adults with complex communication needs received intervention. As part of the intervention, the majority of the participants (n = 24; 86%) were introduced to new AAC systems (e.g., picture, communication application). Ten of 12 studies showed at least moderate evidence of effectiveness. Only three of 12 studies met the WWC standards without reservation. Findings from this review call for action to ensure quality AAC access and services are available to adults with complex communication needs.","PeriodicalId":46403,"journal":{"name":"Communication Disorders Quarterly","volume":"43 1","pages":"182 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1525740121991478","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Adults With Complex Communication Needs: A Review of Single-Case Research\",\"authors\":\"Natalie R. Andzik, Yun-Ching Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1525740121991478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, including studies that used a single-case design (SCD) and taught augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) use to adults with complex communication needs. The purpose of this review was to describe (a) adults receiving AAC intervention, (b) components of the interventions used, and (c) how the literature met quality standards set by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). Across the 12 SCD studies included, a total of 28 adults with complex communication needs received intervention. As part of the intervention, the majority of the participants (n = 24; 86%) were introduced to new AAC systems (e.g., picture, communication application). Ten of 12 studies showed at least moderate evidence of effectiveness. Only three of 12 studies met the WWC standards without reservation. Findings from this review call for action to ensure quality AAC access and services are available to adults with complex communication needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Disorders Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"182 - 194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1525740121991478\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Disorders Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740121991478\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Disorders Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740121991478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

作者对文献进行了系统回顾，包括使用单一案例设计（SCD）并向有复杂沟通需求的成年人教授增强和替代沟通（AAC）的研究。本综述的目的是描述（a）接受AAC干预的成年人，（b）使用的干预措施的组成部分，以及（c）文献如何达到What Works Clearinghouse（WWC）制定的质量标准。在包括的12项SCD研究中，共有28名有复杂沟通需求的成年人接受了干预。作为干预措施的一部分，大多数参与者（n=24；86%）被介绍到新的AAC系统（如图片、通信应用程序）。12项研究中有10项显示了至少适度的有效性证据。12项研究中只有3项毫无保留地符合WWC标准。这项审查的结果呼吁采取行动，确保有复杂沟通需求的成年人能够获得高质量的AAC接入和服务。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Adults With Complex Communication Needs: A Review of Single-Case Research

The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature, including studies that used a single-case design (SCD) and taught augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) use to adults with complex communication needs. The purpose of this review was to describe (a) adults receiving AAC intervention, (b) components of the interventions used, and (c) how the literature met quality standards set by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). Across the 12 SCD studies included, a total of 28 adults with complex communication needs received intervention. As part of the intervention, the majority of the participants (n = 24; 86%) were introduced to new AAC systems (e.g., picture, communication application). Ten of 12 studies showed at least moderate evidence of effectiveness. Only three of 12 studies met the WWC standards without reservation. Findings from this review call for action to ensure quality AAC access and services are available to adults with complex communication needs.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Communication Disorders Quarterly REHABILITATION-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Articles for Communication Disorders Quarterly (CDQ) are accepted for review on a continual basis. The editor of CDQ welcomes submissions of previously unpublished applied and clinical research relating to typical and atypical communication across the lifespan. This includes assessment of and interventions for communicative disorders in infants, toddlers, young children, school-age children, youth, and adults. The readers of CDQ represent a breadth of viewpoints and professional interests, which is also reflected in the diversity of interests and expertise of the editorial board members. The journal is particularly of interest to speech–language pathologists and teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing. CDQ uses a masked peer review process for submissions.