马克·马塔巴内的克菲尔男孩、黑人意识与自由主义的谬误

IF 0.4 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Marzia Milazzo
{"title":"马克·马塔巴内的克菲尔男孩、黑人意识与自由主义的谬误","authors":"Marzia Milazzo","doi":"10.1353/ari.2021.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Offering a sustained reading of Mark Mathabane's K*ffir Boy: The True Story of a Black Youth's Coming of Age in Apartheid South Africa (1986), this essay examines the autobiography in light of Steve Biko's thought to demonstrate how Mathabane's stated goals of challenging racism and advancing liberation for Black people are in conflict with his liberalism. Interrogating the autobiography in view of Black Consciousness philosophy brings into stark relief the contradictions that inform its racial politics. As I read the work against the grain and probe the reasons for its enduring popularity among US readers, I show that, paradoxically, Mathabane both conceals and makes visible the workings of white supremacy. While Mathabane argues that white liberals are not responsible for apartheid, he unwittingly demonstrates the opposite, thereby exposing how white liberals worked alongside white nationalists to uphold racial dictatorship in South Africa. The autobiography thus illustrates what Biko calls \"the totality of the white power structure,\" namely how white people work as a collective across ideological boundaries to maintain the racist status quo. In the process, the work shows that the attempt to fold Black people into the logics of liberalism upholds the racism that liberalism depends upon. Ultimately, K*ffir Boy reveals not only the fallacies of liberalism and impossibility of white antiracism, but also the unwavering importance of Black Consciousness in the ongoing struggle for Black liberation.","PeriodicalId":51893,"journal":{"name":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","volume":"52 1","pages":"29 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mark Mathabane's K*ffir Boy, Black Consciousness, and the Fallacies of Liberalism\",\"authors\":\"Marzia Milazzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ari.2021.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Offering a sustained reading of Mark Mathabane's K*ffir Boy: The True Story of a Black Youth's Coming of Age in Apartheid South Africa (1986), this essay examines the autobiography in light of Steve Biko's thought to demonstrate how Mathabane's stated goals of challenging racism and advancing liberation for Black people are in conflict with his liberalism. Interrogating the autobiography in view of Black Consciousness philosophy brings into stark relief the contradictions that inform its racial politics. As I read the work against the grain and probe the reasons for its enduring popularity among US readers, I show that, paradoxically, Mathabane both conceals and makes visible the workings of white supremacy. While Mathabane argues that white liberals are not responsible for apartheid, he unwittingly demonstrates the opposite, thereby exposing how white liberals worked alongside white nationalists to uphold racial dictatorship in South Africa. The autobiography thus illustrates what Biko calls \\\"the totality of the white power structure,\\\" namely how white people work as a collective across ideological boundaries to maintain the racist status quo. In the process, the work shows that the attempt to fold Black people into the logics of liberalism upholds the racism that liberalism depends upon. Ultimately, K*ffir Boy reveals not only the fallacies of liberalism and impossibility of white antiracism, but also the unwavering importance of Black Consciousness in the ongoing struggle for Black liberation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2021.0024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARIEL-A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ari.2021.0024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文持续阅读了马克·马塔班的《克菲尔男孩:种族隔离的南非黑人青年成长的真实故事》(1986),并结合史蒂夫·比科的思想对这本自传进行了研究,以证明马塔班所宣称的挑战种族主义和促进黑人解放的目标与他的自由主义是如何冲突的。从黑人意识哲学的角度对自传进行质疑,使其种族政治中的矛盾得到了明显的缓解。当我违背初衷地阅读这部作品,并探究它在美国读者中持续受欢迎的原因时,我发现,矛盾的是,Mathabane既掩盖了白人至上主义的运作,又让人看到了它。虽然Mathabane认为白人自由主义者不对种族隔离负责,但他无意中证明了相反的观点,从而揭露了白人自由主义主义者如何与白人民族主义者一起在南非维护种族独裁。因此,这本自传展示了比科所说的“白人权力结构的整体”,即白人如何作为一个集体跨越意识形态界限来维持种族主义现状。在这个过程中,这项工作表明,将黑人纳入自由主义逻辑的尝试维护了自由主义所依赖的种族主义。最终,《克菲尔男孩》不仅揭示了自由主义的谬误和白人反种族主义的不可能性,还揭示了黑人意识在正在进行的黑人解放斗争中坚定不移的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mark Mathabane's K*ffir Boy, Black Consciousness, and the Fallacies of Liberalism
Abstract:Offering a sustained reading of Mark Mathabane's K*ffir Boy: The True Story of a Black Youth's Coming of Age in Apartheid South Africa (1986), this essay examines the autobiography in light of Steve Biko's thought to demonstrate how Mathabane's stated goals of challenging racism and advancing liberation for Black people are in conflict with his liberalism. Interrogating the autobiography in view of Black Consciousness philosophy brings into stark relief the contradictions that inform its racial politics. As I read the work against the grain and probe the reasons for its enduring popularity among US readers, I show that, paradoxically, Mathabane both conceals and makes visible the workings of white supremacy. While Mathabane argues that white liberals are not responsible for apartheid, he unwittingly demonstrates the opposite, thereby exposing how white liberals worked alongside white nationalists to uphold racial dictatorship in South Africa. The autobiography thus illustrates what Biko calls "the totality of the white power structure," namely how white people work as a collective across ideological boundaries to maintain the racist status quo. In the process, the work shows that the attempt to fold Black people into the logics of liberalism upholds the racism that liberalism depends upon. Ultimately, K*ffir Boy reveals not only the fallacies of liberalism and impossibility of white antiracism, but also the unwavering importance of Black Consciousness in the ongoing struggle for Black liberation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信