不确定性的维度:对五个COVID-19数据集的时空回顾

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Dylan Halpern, Qinyun Lin, Ryan Wang, Stephanie Yang, Steve Goldstein, Marynia Kolak
{"title":"不确定性的维度:对五个COVID-19数据集的时空回顾","authors":"Dylan Halpern, Qinyun Lin, Ryan Wang, Stephanie Yang, Steve Goldstein, Marynia Kolak","doi":"10.1080/15230406.2021.1975311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 surveillance across the U.S. is essential to tracking and mitigating the pandemic, but data representing cases and deaths may be impacted by attribute, spatial, and temporal uncertainties. COVID-19 case and death data are essential to understanding the pandemic and serve as key inputs for prediction models that inform policy-decisions; consistent information across datasets is critical to ensuring coherent findings. We implement an exploratory data analytic approach to characterize, synthesize, and visualize spatial-temporal dimensions of uncertainty across commonly used datasets for case and death metrics (Johns Hopkins University, the New York Times, USAFacts, and 1Point3Acres). We scrutinize data consistency to assess where and when disagreements occur, potentially indicating underlying uncertainty. We observe differences in cumulative case and death rates to highlight discrepancies and identify spatial patterns. Data are assessed using pairwise agreement (Cohen's kappa) and agreement across all datasets (Fleiss' kappa) to summarize changes over time. Findings suggest highest agreements between CDC, JHU, and NYT datasets. We find nine discrete type-components of information uncertainty for COVID-19 datasets reflecting various complex processes. Understanding processes and indicators of uncertainty in COVID-19 data reporting is especially relevant to public health professionals and policymakers to accurately understand and communicate information about the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":47562,"journal":{"name":"Cartography and Geographic Information Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"200-221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensions of Uncertainty: A spatiotemporal review of five COVID-19 datasets.\",\"authors\":\"Dylan Halpern, Qinyun Lin, Ryan Wang, Stephanie Yang, Steve Goldstein, Marynia Kolak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15230406.2021.1975311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>COVID-19 surveillance across the U.S. is essential to tracking and mitigating the pandemic, but data representing cases and deaths may be impacted by attribute, spatial, and temporal uncertainties. COVID-19 case and death data are essential to understanding the pandemic and serve as key inputs for prediction models that inform policy-decisions; consistent information across datasets is critical to ensuring coherent findings. We implement an exploratory data analytic approach to characterize, synthesize, and visualize spatial-temporal dimensions of uncertainty across commonly used datasets for case and death metrics (Johns Hopkins University, the New York Times, USAFacts, and 1Point3Acres). We scrutinize data consistency to assess where and when disagreements occur, potentially indicating underlying uncertainty. We observe differences in cumulative case and death rates to highlight discrepancies and identify spatial patterns. Data are assessed using pairwise agreement (Cohen's kappa) and agreement across all datasets (Fleiss' kappa) to summarize changes over time. Findings suggest highest agreements between CDC, JHU, and NYT datasets. We find nine discrete type-components of information uncertainty for COVID-19 datasets reflecting various complex processes. Understanding processes and indicators of uncertainty in COVID-19 data reporting is especially relevant to public health professionals and policymakers to accurately understand and communicate information about the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cartography and Geographic Information Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"200-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196018/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cartography and Geographic Information Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.1975311\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cartography and Geographic Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.1975311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国各地的 COVID-19 监测对跟踪和缓解大流行至关重要,但代表病例和死亡的数据可能会受到属性、空间和时间不确定性的影响。COVID-19 病例和死亡数据对了解疫情至关重要,也是为政策决策提供信息的预测模型的关键输入;数据集之间信息的一致性对确保研究结果的一致性至关重要。我们采用探索性数据分析方法,对病例和死亡指标常用数据集(约翰霍普金斯大学、《纽约时报》、USAFacts 和 1Point3Acres)中不确定性的时空维度进行描述、综合和可视化。我们仔细研究数据的一致性,以评估在何时何地出现分歧,这可能表明潜在的不确定性。我们观察累积病例和死亡率的差异,以突出差异并识别空间模式。我们使用配对一致性(Cohen's kappa)和所有数据集的一致性(Fleiss's kappa)对数据进行评估,以总结随时间的变化。研究结果表明,中国疾病预防控制中心、日本厚生大学和《纽约时报》数据集之间的一致性最高。我们发现 COVID-19 数据集的信息不确定性有九个离散的类型成分,反映了各种复杂的过程。了解 COVID-19 数据报告中的不确定性过程和指标对于公共卫生专业人员和政策制定者准确理解和传达有关大流行病的信息尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dimensions of Uncertainty: A spatiotemporal review of five COVID-19 datasets.

COVID-19 surveillance across the U.S. is essential to tracking and mitigating the pandemic, but data representing cases and deaths may be impacted by attribute, spatial, and temporal uncertainties. COVID-19 case and death data are essential to understanding the pandemic and serve as key inputs for prediction models that inform policy-decisions; consistent information across datasets is critical to ensuring coherent findings. We implement an exploratory data analytic approach to characterize, synthesize, and visualize spatial-temporal dimensions of uncertainty across commonly used datasets for case and death metrics (Johns Hopkins University, the New York Times, USAFacts, and 1Point3Acres). We scrutinize data consistency to assess where and when disagreements occur, potentially indicating underlying uncertainty. We observe differences in cumulative case and death rates to highlight discrepancies and identify spatial patterns. Data are assessed using pairwise agreement (Cohen's kappa) and agreement across all datasets (Fleiss' kappa) to summarize changes over time. Findings suggest highest agreements between CDC, JHU, and NYT datasets. We find nine discrete type-components of information uncertainty for COVID-19 datasets reflecting various complex processes. Understanding processes and indicators of uncertainty in COVID-19 data reporting is especially relevant to public health professionals and policymakers to accurately understand and communicate information about the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Cartography and Geographic Information Science (CaGIS) is the official publication of the Cartography and Geographic Information Society (CaGIS), a member organization of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM). The Cartography and Geographic Information Society supports research, education, and practices that improve the understanding, creation, analysis, and use of maps and geographic information. The society serves as a forum for the exchange of original concepts, techniques, approaches, and experiences by those who design, implement, and use geospatial technologies through the publication of authoritative articles and international papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信