{"title":"丁尼生","authors":"Linda K. Hughes","doi":"10.1353/vp.2021.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before concluding, it is worth noting two smaller contributions to the study of Swinburne this past year that join Helsinger’s essay, mentioned earlier, in connecting Swinburne with latenineteenthcentury art and music. In a comprehensive book on Wagner’s artistic legacy, Wagnerism: Art and Politics in the Shadow of Music (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021), Alex Ross devotes a section of one chapter to Wagner’s role in PreRaphaelite art and poetry with brief readings of Tennyson, Arnold, Morris, and Swinburne. Citing “Laus Veneris” and Tristram of Lyonesse, Ross catches the Wagnerian ele ments in Swinburne’s incantatory verse. Though Wagner seemed to some British artists an interloper on their own cultural property, Ross notes just how completely Wagner’s version of the Tristan legend had taken over by the time of Tristram. Ross also tells us of two German immigrants whose reviews and essays paved the way for Wagner’s British reception. One was Francis Hueffer, who married Catherine Madox Brown, the daughter of Ford Madox Brown, and whose son would become the poet and novelist Ford Madox Ford. The other was Edward Dannreuther, founder of the London Wagner Society, whose affiliation with Swinburne is also addressed this year by Michael Craske in “Dannreuther’s Hidden Swinburne References Signal Artistic Kinship” (Notes and Queries 66, no. 2 [2019]: 300–302). Dannreuther’s articles on Beethoven and Wagner in the early 1870s contain, as Craske shows, numerous small borrowings from Swinburne’s published criticism that create “a hidden statement of artistic fraternity” (p. 300). If work on Swinburne in 2020–2021 was somewhat scant, the scholarship nonetheless testifies to the curious centrality of this poet—to lateVictorian poetry and culture, to the prehistory of modernism, and to our field’s present concerns with identity, sexuality, and po liti cal vio lence. In these essays, Swinburne emerges as a crucial figure of Victorian modernism, gathering elements of nineteenthcentury artistic culture and innovating on them in ways that extend his reach well into the twentieth.","PeriodicalId":54107,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN POETRY","volume":"59 1","pages":"372 - 381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tennyson\",\"authors\":\"Linda K. Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/vp.2021.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Before concluding, it is worth noting two smaller contributions to the study of Swinburne this past year that join Helsinger’s essay, mentioned earlier, in connecting Swinburne with latenineteenthcentury art and music. In a comprehensive book on Wagner’s artistic legacy, Wagnerism: Art and Politics in the Shadow of Music (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021), Alex Ross devotes a section of one chapter to Wagner’s role in PreRaphaelite art and poetry with brief readings of Tennyson, Arnold, Morris, and Swinburne. Citing “Laus Veneris” and Tristram of Lyonesse, Ross catches the Wagnerian ele ments in Swinburne’s incantatory verse. Though Wagner seemed to some British artists an interloper on their own cultural property, Ross notes just how completely Wagner’s version of the Tristan legend had taken over by the time of Tristram. Ross also tells us of two German immigrants whose reviews and essays paved the way for Wagner’s British reception. One was Francis Hueffer, who married Catherine Madox Brown, the daughter of Ford Madox Brown, and whose son would become the poet and novelist Ford Madox Ford. The other was Edward Dannreuther, founder of the London Wagner Society, whose affiliation with Swinburne is also addressed this year by Michael Craske in “Dannreuther’s Hidden Swinburne References Signal Artistic Kinship” (Notes and Queries 66, no. 2 [2019]: 300–302). Dannreuther’s articles on Beethoven and Wagner in the early 1870s contain, as Craske shows, numerous small borrowings from Swinburne’s published criticism that create “a hidden statement of artistic fraternity” (p. 300). If work on Swinburne in 2020–2021 was somewhat scant, the scholarship nonetheless testifies to the curious centrality of this poet—to lateVictorian poetry and culture, to the prehistory of modernism, and to our field’s present concerns with identity, sexuality, and po liti cal vio lence. In these essays, Swinburne emerges as a crucial figure of Victorian modernism, gathering elements of nineteenthcentury artistic culture and innovating on them in ways that extend his reach well into the twentieth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"372 - 381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VICTORIAN POETRY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2021.0015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN POETRY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2021.0015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在结束之前,值得注意的是,在过去的一年里,对斯温伯恩的研究有两个较小的贡献,这两个贡献与之前提到的赫尔辛格的文章一起,将斯温伯恩与20世纪晚期的艺术和音乐联系起来。在一本关于瓦格纳艺术遗产的综合性著作《瓦格纳主义:音乐阴影下的艺术与政治》(纽约:Farrar、Straus和Giroux,2021)中,亚历克斯·罗斯用一章中的一部分来阐述瓦格纳在拉斐尔前派艺术和诗歌中的作用,并简要阅读了丁尼生、阿诺德、莫里斯和斯温伯恩。罗斯引用了“Laus Veneris”和Lyonesse的Tristram,在Swinburne的咒语诗中捕捉到了瓦格纳时代的元素。尽管在一些英国艺术家看来,瓦格纳是他们自己文化财产的闯入者,但罗斯注意到,到特里斯特拉姆时代,瓦格纳版本的特里斯坦传奇已经完全接管了。罗斯还告诉我们两位德国移民,他们的评论和文章为瓦格纳在英国的接待铺平了道路。其中一位是弗朗西斯·休弗,她嫁给了福特·马多克斯·布朗的女儿凯瑟琳·马多克斯·布朗,她的儿子后来成为诗人和小说家福特·马多克斯·福特。另一位是伦敦瓦格纳协会创始人Edward Dannruther,他与斯温伯恩的关系今年也由Michael Craske在《Dannruther's Hidden Swinburne References Signal Art Kinship》(《注释与疑问》66,no.2[2019]:300–302)中阐述。正如Craske所展示的那样,Dannruther在19世纪70年代初关于贝多芬和瓦格纳的文章中,包含了许多从Swinburne发表的批评中借来的小东西,这些批评创造了“一种隐藏的艺术博爱的声明”(第300页)。如果说2020-2021年对斯温伯恩的研究有点少的话,那么这项奖学金仍然证明了这位诗人奇怪的中心地位——对维多利亚晚期的诗歌和文化,对现代主义的史前史,以及我们这个领域目前对身份、性和政治行为的关注。在这些文章中,斯温伯恩成为了维多利亚现代主义的关键人物,他收集了19世纪艺术文化的元素,并在这些元素上进行了创新,将他的影响力延伸到了20世纪。
Before concluding, it is worth noting two smaller contributions to the study of Swinburne this past year that join Helsinger’s essay, mentioned earlier, in connecting Swinburne with latenineteenthcentury art and music. In a comprehensive book on Wagner’s artistic legacy, Wagnerism: Art and Politics in the Shadow of Music (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021), Alex Ross devotes a section of one chapter to Wagner’s role in PreRaphaelite art and poetry with brief readings of Tennyson, Arnold, Morris, and Swinburne. Citing “Laus Veneris” and Tristram of Lyonesse, Ross catches the Wagnerian ele ments in Swinburne’s incantatory verse. Though Wagner seemed to some British artists an interloper on their own cultural property, Ross notes just how completely Wagner’s version of the Tristan legend had taken over by the time of Tristram. Ross also tells us of two German immigrants whose reviews and essays paved the way for Wagner’s British reception. One was Francis Hueffer, who married Catherine Madox Brown, the daughter of Ford Madox Brown, and whose son would become the poet and novelist Ford Madox Ford. The other was Edward Dannreuther, founder of the London Wagner Society, whose affiliation with Swinburne is also addressed this year by Michael Craske in “Dannreuther’s Hidden Swinburne References Signal Artistic Kinship” (Notes and Queries 66, no. 2 [2019]: 300–302). Dannreuther’s articles on Beethoven and Wagner in the early 1870s contain, as Craske shows, numerous small borrowings from Swinburne’s published criticism that create “a hidden statement of artistic fraternity” (p. 300). If work on Swinburne in 2020–2021 was somewhat scant, the scholarship nonetheless testifies to the curious centrality of this poet—to lateVictorian poetry and culture, to the prehistory of modernism, and to our field’s present concerns with identity, sexuality, and po liti cal vio lence. In these essays, Swinburne emerges as a crucial figure of Victorian modernism, gathering elements of nineteenthcentury artistic culture and innovating on them in ways that extend his reach well into the twentieth.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1962 to further the aesthetic study of the poetry of the Victorian Period in Britain (1830–1914), Victorian Poetry publishes articles from a broad range of theoretical and critical angles, including but not confined to new historicism, feminism, and social and cultural issues. The journal has expanded its purview from the major figures of Victorian England (Tennyson, Browning, the Rossettis, etc.) to a wider compass of poets of all classes and gender identifications in nineteenth-century Britain and the Commonwealth. Victorian Poetry is edited by John B. Lamb and sponsored by the Department of English at West Virginia University.