国际公法、国际税收与税收争议解决

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
J. Chaisse, Irma Mosquera
{"title":"国际公法、国际税收与税收争议解决","authors":"J. Chaisse, Irma Mosquera","doi":"10.1080/10192557.2022.2102585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT International tax law has not been discussed much by the lawyers involved in public international law. Due to this, there exists a gap, as presently, developments in international law do not correspond to the constant developments in international tax law. This article seeks to highlight the challenges that would arise from the normative expansion of taxation law. Scholars have highlighted the need for a multilateral tax treaty. However, such attempts made by the UN and OECD have failed due to difficulties in ensuring the distribution of taxation power between the source and residence states. This issue becomes more prominent for digital economy taxation, as the digital firms may trade and operate without any physical presence in a state. The present set of proposals suggests introducing new rules for fair allocation of taxing rights and duty on the part of states to tax at a minimum rate. To this end, OECD has introduced the BEPS Inclusive Framework that would include even non-OECD members in decision making. This article underlines the impact of international tax law on different areas of international law and further points out the best practices in trade, investment, and international law so as to bring them in line with the developments in international tax law.","PeriodicalId":42799,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Law Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"192 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public international law, international taxation and tax dispute resolution\",\"authors\":\"J. Chaisse, Irma Mosquera\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10192557.2022.2102585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT International tax law has not been discussed much by the lawyers involved in public international law. Due to this, there exists a gap, as presently, developments in international law do not correspond to the constant developments in international tax law. This article seeks to highlight the challenges that would arise from the normative expansion of taxation law. Scholars have highlighted the need for a multilateral tax treaty. However, such attempts made by the UN and OECD have failed due to difficulties in ensuring the distribution of taxation power between the source and residence states. This issue becomes more prominent for digital economy taxation, as the digital firms may trade and operate without any physical presence in a state. The present set of proposals suggests introducing new rules for fair allocation of taxing rights and duty on the part of states to tax at a minimum rate. To this end, OECD has introduced the BEPS Inclusive Framework that would include even non-OECD members in decision making. This article underlines the impact of international tax law on different areas of international law and further points out the best practices in trade, investment, and international law so as to bring them in line with the developments in international tax law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"192 - 203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2102585\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2102585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要国际公法领域的律师们对国际税法的讨论并不多。因此,存在着差距,因为目前国际法的发展与国际税法的不断发展并不一致。本文试图强调税法规范性扩展所带来的挑战。学者们强调了多边税收协定的必要性。然而,由于难以确保来源国和居住国之间的税收权力分配,联合国和经合组织的这些尝试都失败了。这一问题在数字经济税收方面变得更加突出,因为数字公司可能在一个州没有任何实体存在的情况下进行交易和运营。目前的一系列提案建议引入新的规则,公平分配各州以最低税率征税的权利和义务。为此,经合组织推出了BEPS包容性框架,甚至将非经合组织成员纳入决策。本文强调了国际税法对国际法不同领域的影响,并进一步指出了贸易、投资和国际法方面的最佳做法,以使其与国际税法的发展相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public international law, international taxation and tax dispute resolution
ABSTRACT International tax law has not been discussed much by the lawyers involved in public international law. Due to this, there exists a gap, as presently, developments in international law do not correspond to the constant developments in international tax law. This article seeks to highlight the challenges that would arise from the normative expansion of taxation law. Scholars have highlighted the need for a multilateral tax treaty. However, such attempts made by the UN and OECD have failed due to difficulties in ensuring the distribution of taxation power between the source and residence states. This issue becomes more prominent for digital economy taxation, as the digital firms may trade and operate without any physical presence in a state. The present set of proposals suggests introducing new rules for fair allocation of taxing rights and duty on the part of states to tax at a minimum rate. To this end, OECD has introduced the BEPS Inclusive Framework that would include even non-OECD members in decision making. This article underlines the impact of international tax law on different areas of international law and further points out the best practices in trade, investment, and international law so as to bring them in line with the developments in international tax law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信