博物馆中的酷儿自我表现

IF 0.4 4区 艺术学 0 ART
Uliana Zanetti
{"title":"博物馆中的酷儿自我表现","authors":"Uliana Zanetti","doi":"10.1080/13500775.2020.1873500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Most museums claim to foster the democratisation of their collections through top-down educational programmes. However, it is possible to challenge this perspective and, instead, encourage self-empowerment in lieu of imitation, hosting, and fostering cultural contributions offered by different communities that cultivate independent paths toward creating identities and institutional recognition. Although ‘discrimination’ seems to be a constitutive feature of museums, in that their entire structure is based on exclusion/inclusion processes at multiple levels, their structure offers unlimited possibilities to enact different approaches. If we consider museums as hypertexts that enable continuous re-readings, we can adopt them as generative spaces for critical and innovative practices. Several events that took place at the Modern Art Museum of Bologna (MAMbo) over the past decade show different approaches to tackling discrimination in museums. Each offered a range of reflections and activities concerning specific topics: the audience of sightless people in contemporary art museums (Collezioni mai viste, 2008), women’s art (Autoritratti, 2013 ), and gender representations (Performing Gender, 2015). Each event was developed as a research action project and carried out by groups strongly committed to contemporary art, respectively representing communities of sightless people, women, and LGBTQI+. Framing specificity as a tool for more diverse forms of representation, museums might question their own history, collections, practices and contexts, cooperating with existing communities representing cultural diversity to foster new narratives and enable the creation of new sources for different discourses and histories to be told.","PeriodicalId":45701,"journal":{"name":"MUSEUM INTERNATIONAL","volume":"72 1","pages":"104 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13500775.2020.1873500","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Queer Self-Representation Inside the Museum\",\"authors\":\"Uliana Zanetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13500775.2020.1873500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Most museums claim to foster the democratisation of their collections through top-down educational programmes. However, it is possible to challenge this perspective and, instead, encourage self-empowerment in lieu of imitation, hosting, and fostering cultural contributions offered by different communities that cultivate independent paths toward creating identities and institutional recognition. Although ‘discrimination’ seems to be a constitutive feature of museums, in that their entire structure is based on exclusion/inclusion processes at multiple levels, their structure offers unlimited possibilities to enact different approaches. If we consider museums as hypertexts that enable continuous re-readings, we can adopt them as generative spaces for critical and innovative practices. Several events that took place at the Modern Art Museum of Bologna (MAMbo) over the past decade show different approaches to tackling discrimination in museums. Each offered a range of reflections and activities concerning specific topics: the audience of sightless people in contemporary art museums (Collezioni mai viste, 2008), women’s art (Autoritratti, 2013 ), and gender representations (Performing Gender, 2015). Each event was developed as a research action project and carried out by groups strongly committed to contemporary art, respectively representing communities of sightless people, women, and LGBTQI+. Framing specificity as a tool for more diverse forms of representation, museums might question their own history, collections, practices and contexts, cooperating with existing communities representing cultural diversity to foster new narratives and enable the creation of new sources for different discourses and histories to be told.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUSEUM INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"104 - 115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13500775.2020.1873500\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUSEUM INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13500775.2020.1873500\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSEUM INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13500775.2020.1873500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数博物馆声称通过自上而下的教育计划来促进其藏品的民主化。然而,挑战这种观点是有可能的,相反,鼓励自我赋权,而不是模仿、主持和促进不同社区提供的文化贡献,这些贡献为创造身份和制度认可开辟了独立的道路。尽管“歧视”似乎是博物馆的一个构成特征,因为它们的整个结构是基于多个层面的排斥/包容过程,但它们的结构为制定不同的方法提供了无限的可能性。如果我们把博物馆看作是可以不断重复阅读的超文本,我们就可以把它们作为批判性和创新实践的生成空间。过去十年在博洛尼亚现代艺术博物馆(MAMbo)举行的几次活动显示了解决博物馆歧视问题的不同方法。每个展览都提供了一系列关于特定主题的思考和活动:当代艺术博物馆中的盲人观众(Collezioni mai visit, 2008),女性艺术(Autoritratti, 2013)和性别表现(Performing gender, 2015)。每个活动都是作为一个研究行动项目,由致力于当代艺术的团体分别代表盲人群体、女性群体和LGBTQI+群体开展。博物馆可能会质疑自己的历史、藏品、实践和背景,与代表文化多样性的现有社区合作,培育新的叙事,并为不同的话语和历史创造新的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Queer Self-Representation Inside the Museum
Abstract Most museums claim to foster the democratisation of their collections through top-down educational programmes. However, it is possible to challenge this perspective and, instead, encourage self-empowerment in lieu of imitation, hosting, and fostering cultural contributions offered by different communities that cultivate independent paths toward creating identities and institutional recognition. Although ‘discrimination’ seems to be a constitutive feature of museums, in that their entire structure is based on exclusion/inclusion processes at multiple levels, their structure offers unlimited possibilities to enact different approaches. If we consider museums as hypertexts that enable continuous re-readings, we can adopt them as generative spaces for critical and innovative practices. Several events that took place at the Modern Art Museum of Bologna (MAMbo) over the past decade show different approaches to tackling discrimination in museums. Each offered a range of reflections and activities concerning specific topics: the audience of sightless people in contemporary art museums (Collezioni mai viste, 2008), women’s art (Autoritratti, 2013 ), and gender representations (Performing Gender, 2015). Each event was developed as a research action project and carried out by groups strongly committed to contemporary art, respectively representing communities of sightless people, women, and LGBTQI+. Framing specificity as a tool for more diverse forms of representation, museums might question their own history, collections, practices and contexts, cooperating with existing communities representing cultural diversity to foster new narratives and enable the creation of new sources for different discourses and histories to be told.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: In its new revised form Museum International is a forum for intellectually rigorous discussion of the ethics and practices of museums and heritage organizations. The journal aims to foster dialogue between research in the social sciences and political decision-making in a changing cultural environment. International in scope and cross-disciplinary in approach Museum International brings social-scientific information and methodology to debates around museums and heritage, and offers recommendations on national and international cultural policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信