研究是新的倡导吗?通过“以解决方案为重点的倡导”动员社会科学研究

IF 1.1 4区社会学 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES

Journal of Poverty and Social Justice Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI:10.1332/175982721x16661952940144

Kaitlin Schwan, N. Nichols, Jayne A. Malenfant

{"title":"研究是新的倡导吗?通过“以解决方案为重点的倡导”动员社会科学研究","authors":"Kaitlin Schwan, N. Nichols, Jayne A. Malenfant","doi":"10.1332/175982721x16661952940144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advocacy coalitions have played an increasingly critical role in evidence-based policy development. Despite this, little is known about how such coalitions leverage research to influence policy. Addressing this gap, this qualitative study explores how a multi-sectoral advocacy coalition seeks to shape Canadian food security policy through ‘solutions-focused advocacy’. We explore four of the coalition’s strategies: (1) shaping policymakers’ thinking and priorities while responding to governments’ needs; (2) utilising research to help governments achieve political ‘wins’ while advancing the cause; (3) using research to broker relationships between ‘community’, government, and the coalition; and (4) mobilising research to ‘bring the sector along’.","PeriodicalId":45090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is research the new advocacy? Mobilising social science research through ‘solutions-focused advocacy’\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlin Schwan, N. Nichols, Jayne A. Malenfant\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/175982721x16661952940144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advocacy coalitions have played an increasingly critical role in evidence-based policy development. Despite this, little is known about how such coalitions leverage research to influence policy. Addressing this gap, this qualitative study explores how a multi-sectoral advocacy coalition seeks to shape Canadian food security policy through ‘solutions-focused advocacy’. We explore four of the coalition’s strategies: (1) shaping policymakers’ thinking and priorities while responding to governments’ needs; (2) utilising research to help governments achieve political ‘wins’ while advancing the cause; (3) using research to broker relationships between ‘community’, government, and the coalition; and (4) mobilising research to ‘bring the sector along’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/175982721x16661952940144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/175982721x16661952940144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

倡导联盟在以证据为基础的政策制定中发挥着越来越重要的作用。尽管如此，人们对这些联盟如何利用研究来影响政策知之甚少。为了解决这一差距，本定性研究探讨了多部门倡导联盟如何通过“以解决方案为重点的倡导”来寻求塑造加拿大的粮食安全政策。我们探讨了该联盟的四项战略:(1)在响应政府需求的同时，塑造决策者的思维和优先事项;(2)利用研究帮助政府在推进事业的同时取得政治上的“胜利”;(3)利用研究来中介“社区”、政府和联盟之间的关系;(4)动员研究来“带动这个行业”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Is research the new advocacy? Mobilising social science research through ‘solutions-focused advocacy’

Advocacy coalitions have played an increasingly critical role in evidence-based policy development. Despite this, little is known about how such coalitions leverage research to influence policy. Addressing this gap, this qualitative study explores how a multi-sectoral advocacy coalition seeks to shape Canadian food security policy through ‘solutions-focused advocacy’. We explore four of the coalition’s strategies: (1) shaping policymakers’ thinking and priorities while responding to governments’ needs; (2) utilising research to help governments achieve political ‘wins’ while advancing the cause; (3) using research to broker relationships between ‘community’, government, and the coalition; and (4) mobilising research to ‘bring the sector along’.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Poverty and Social Justice Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

23.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Poverty and Social Justice provides a unique blend of high-quality research, policy and practice from leading authors in the field related to all aspects of poverty and social exclusion. The journal has changed its name to reflect its wider scope and has growing international coverage. Content spans a broad spectrum of poverty-related topics including social security, employment and unemployment, regeneration, housing, health, education and criminal justice, as well as issues of ethnicity, gender, disability and other inequalities as they relate to social justice.