从出生到12-14周的一般运动轨迹校正了早产极低出生体重和极低出生重量婴儿的年龄

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
R. Krynauw, J. C. du Preez, J. V. van Zyl, M. Burger
{"title":"从出生到12-14周的一般运动轨迹校正了早产极低出生体重和极低出生重量婴儿的年龄","authors":"R. Krynauw, J. C. du Preez, J. V. van Zyl, M. Burger","doi":"10.7196/sajch.2022.v16i2.1893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBackground. General movement assessment (GMA) is an assessment tool with high predictive validity for neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Information available describing the trajectory of general movements (GMs) in high-risk preterm-born infants and the use thereof in low- and middle-income countries is limited. \nObjective. To describe the trajectories of GMs from birth until 12 - 14 weeks’ corrected age, and determine the association of known perinatal risk factors on GM trajectories in very low-birthweight and extremely low-birthweight preterm infants. \nMethods. This was a longitudinal, prospective cohort study with 119 preterm infants born at <33 weeks’ gestation and with a birthweight <1 500 g. GMs were recorded at four key age periods: 1 - 2 weeks after birth to 33 weeks post menstrual age (PMA); 34 - 37 weeks PMA; term equivalent age (TEA); and 12 - 14 weeks corrected age. Detailed perinatal data were collected. \nResults. A total of 300 GMAs were conducted, 157 during the preterm age, 55 during TEA and 88 at 12 - 14 weeks corrected age. At <33 weeks PMA, 96% of GMs were abnormal and 4% normal. At 34 - 37 weeks PMA, 89% of GMs were abnormal and 11% normal. All GMs recorded at term equivalent age were abnormal. At 12 - 14 weeks corrected age, 7% of GMs were abnormal and 93% normal. \nConclusion. GMs were predominantly abnormal prior to term with a significant decrease in abnormality at 12 - 14 weeks corrected age. Lower birthweight and lower PMA were associated with increased odds for abnormal GMs. In a resource-constrained environment, observing GMs at 12 - 14 weeks corrected age (during the fidgety period) is a time- and cost-effective method to determine the risk for adverse neurodevelopment. \n","PeriodicalId":44732,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Child Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The trajectory of general movements from birth until 12 - 14 weeks corrected age in very low birthweight and extremely low-birthweight infants born preterm\",\"authors\":\"R. Krynauw, J. C. du Preez, J. V. van Zyl, M. Burger\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/sajch.2022.v16i2.1893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nBackground. General movement assessment (GMA) is an assessment tool with high predictive validity for neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Information available describing the trajectory of general movements (GMs) in high-risk preterm-born infants and the use thereof in low- and middle-income countries is limited. \\nObjective. To describe the trajectories of GMs from birth until 12 - 14 weeks’ corrected age, and determine the association of known perinatal risk factors on GM trajectories in very low-birthweight and extremely low-birthweight preterm infants. \\nMethods. This was a longitudinal, prospective cohort study with 119 preterm infants born at <33 weeks’ gestation and with a birthweight <1 500 g. GMs were recorded at four key age periods: 1 - 2 weeks after birth to 33 weeks post menstrual age (PMA); 34 - 37 weeks PMA; term equivalent age (TEA); and 12 - 14 weeks corrected age. Detailed perinatal data were collected. \\nResults. A total of 300 GMAs were conducted, 157 during the preterm age, 55 during TEA and 88 at 12 - 14 weeks corrected age. At <33 weeks PMA, 96% of GMs were abnormal and 4% normal. At 34 - 37 weeks PMA, 89% of GMs were abnormal and 11% normal. All GMs recorded at term equivalent age were abnormal. At 12 - 14 weeks corrected age, 7% of GMs were abnormal and 93% normal. \\nConclusion. GMs were predominantly abnormal prior to term with a significant decrease in abnormality at 12 - 14 weeks corrected age. Lower birthweight and lower PMA were associated with increased odds for abnormal GMs. In a resource-constrained environment, observing GMs at 12 - 14 weeks corrected age (during the fidgety period) is a time- and cost-effective method to determine the risk for adverse neurodevelopment. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Child Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Child Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajch.2022.v16i2.1893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajch.2022.v16i2.1893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景一般运动评估(GMA)是一种对早产儿神经发育结果具有较高预测有效性的评估工具。描述高危早产儿的一般运动轨迹及其在中低收入国家的应用的现有信息有限。客观的描述从出生到12-14周校正年龄的GM轨迹,并确定已知围产期风险因素与极低出生体重和极低出生重量早产儿GM轨迹的相关性。方法。这是一项纵向前瞻性队列研究,涉及119名出生于妊娠<33周、出生体重<1500 g的早产儿。在四个关键年龄段记录了GM:出生后1-2周至月经后33周年龄(PMA);34-37周的PMA;学期等效年龄;矫正年龄12~14周。收集了详细的围产期数据。后果共进行了300次GMA,其中157次发生在早产儿,55次发生在TEA,88次发生在12-14周矫正年龄。在<33周PMA时,96%的GM异常,4%正常。在34-37周PMA时,89%的GM异常,11%正常。在足月等效年龄记录的所有GM均异常。在校正后的12-14周龄,7%的GM异常,93%正常。结论GM在足月前主要是异常的,在校正后的12-14周龄异常显著减少。较低的出生体重和较低的PMA与异常GM的几率增加有关。在资源有限的环境中,在12-14周校正年龄(坐立不安期间)观察转基因生物是一种时间和成本效益高的方法,可以确定神经发育不良的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The trajectory of general movements from birth until 12 - 14 weeks corrected age in very low birthweight and extremely low-birthweight infants born preterm
Background. General movement assessment (GMA) is an assessment tool with high predictive validity for neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Information available describing the trajectory of general movements (GMs) in high-risk preterm-born infants and the use thereof in low- and middle-income countries is limited. Objective. To describe the trajectories of GMs from birth until 12 - 14 weeks’ corrected age, and determine the association of known perinatal risk factors on GM trajectories in very low-birthweight and extremely low-birthweight preterm infants. Methods. This was a longitudinal, prospective cohort study with 119 preterm infants born at <33 weeks’ gestation and with a birthweight <1 500 g. GMs were recorded at four key age periods: 1 - 2 weeks after birth to 33 weeks post menstrual age (PMA); 34 - 37 weeks PMA; term equivalent age (TEA); and 12 - 14 weeks corrected age. Detailed perinatal data were collected. Results. A total of 300 GMAs were conducted, 157 during the preterm age, 55 during TEA and 88 at 12 - 14 weeks corrected age. At <33 weeks PMA, 96% of GMs were abnormal and 4% normal. At 34 - 37 weeks PMA, 89% of GMs were abnormal and 11% normal. All GMs recorded at term equivalent age were abnormal. At 12 - 14 weeks corrected age, 7% of GMs were abnormal and 93% normal. Conclusion. GMs were predominantly abnormal prior to term with a significant decrease in abnormality at 12 - 14 weeks corrected age. Lower birthweight and lower PMA were associated with increased odds for abnormal GMs. In a resource-constrained environment, observing GMs at 12 - 14 weeks corrected age (during the fidgety period) is a time- and cost-effective method to determine the risk for adverse neurodevelopment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信