高脉压/卒中容量指数与左心室肥厚高血压患者预后受损相关

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
C. Mancusi, E. Gerdts, G. de Simone, H. Midtbø, M. T. Lønnebakken, K. Boman, K. Wachtell, B. Dahlöf, R. Devereux
{"title":"高脉压/卒中容量指数与左心室肥厚高血压患者预后受损相关","authors":"C. Mancusi, E. Gerdts, G. de Simone, H. Midtbø, M. T. Lønnebakken, K. Boman, K. Wachtell, B. Dahlöf, R. Devereux","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We tested the prognostic impact of a marker of arterial stiffness, pulse pressure/stroke volume index (PP/SVi), in patients with hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. We used data from 866 patients randomized to losartan or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment, over a median of 4.8 years, in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. The association of PP/SVi with outcomes was tested in Cox regression analyses and reported as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In multivariate regression, reduction of PP/SVi was independently associated with male gender, reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP) and relative wall thickness and with an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (all p < .05). After adjusting for confounders, higher baseline PP/SVi predicted a 38% higher hazard of combined major fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (95% CI 1.04–1.84), and higher hazard of cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.35 (95% CI 1.59–3.48) and stroke (HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.06–1.99) (all p < .05). Higher PP/SVi also predicts higher rate of hospitalization for HF (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.48–3.12) and a 52% higher hazard of all-cause mortality (95% CI 1.10–2.09) (both p < .05). In hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, higher PP/SVi was associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.","PeriodicalId":55591,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher pulse pressure/stroke volume index is associated with impaired outcome in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy the LIFE study\",\"authors\":\"C. Mancusi, E. Gerdts, G. de Simone, H. Midtbø, M. T. Lønnebakken, K. Boman, K. Wachtell, B. Dahlöf, R. Devereux\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We tested the prognostic impact of a marker of arterial stiffness, pulse pressure/stroke volume index (PP/SVi), in patients with hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. We used data from 866 patients randomized to losartan or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment, over a median of 4.8 years, in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. The association of PP/SVi with outcomes was tested in Cox regression analyses and reported as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In multivariate regression, reduction of PP/SVi was independently associated with male gender, reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP) and relative wall thickness and with an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (all p < .05). After adjusting for confounders, higher baseline PP/SVi predicted a 38% higher hazard of combined major fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (95% CI 1.04–1.84), and higher hazard of cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.35 (95% CI 1.59–3.48) and stroke (HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.06–1.99) (all p < .05). Higher PP/SVi also predicts higher rate of hospitalization for HF (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.48–3.12) and a 52% higher hazard of all-cause mortality (95% CI 1.10–2.09) (both p < .05). In hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, higher PP/SVi was associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Pressure\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Pressure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2016.1243009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

摘要:我们测试了动脉硬度指标脉压/脑卒中容积指数(PP/SVi)对高血压和左心室肥厚患者预后的影响。在氯沙坦干预降低高血压终点(LIFE)研究中,我们使用了866名随机接受氯沙坦或阿替洛尔为基础的抗高血压治疗的患者的数据,中位时间为4.8年。在Cox回归分析中检验了PP/SVi与结果的关联,并以风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)报告。在多元回归中,PP/SVi的降低与男性、收缩压(BP)和相对壁厚的降低以及左心室射血分数的增加独立相关(均p < 0.05)。在调整混杂因素后,较高的基线PP/SVi预测合并主要致命性和非致命性心血管事件的风险增加38% (95% CI 1.04-1.84),心血管死亡率(HR 2.35 (95% CI 1.59-3.48)和卒中(HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.06-1.99)的风险增加(均p < 0.05)。较高的PP/SVi也预示着较高的HF住院率(HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.48-3.12)和高52%的全因死亡风险(95% CI 1.10-2.09) (p均< 0.05)。在伴有心电图左室肥厚的高血压患者中,较高的PP/SVi与心血管发病率和死亡率增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Higher pulse pressure/stroke volume index is associated with impaired outcome in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy the LIFE study
Abstract We tested the prognostic impact of a marker of arterial stiffness, pulse pressure/stroke volume index (PP/SVi), in patients with hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. We used data from 866 patients randomized to losartan or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment, over a median of 4.8 years, in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study. The association of PP/SVi with outcomes was tested in Cox regression analyses and reported as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In multivariate regression, reduction of PP/SVi was independently associated with male gender, reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP) and relative wall thickness and with an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (all p < .05). After adjusting for confounders, higher baseline PP/SVi predicted a 38% higher hazard of combined major fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (95% CI 1.04–1.84), and higher hazard of cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.35 (95% CI 1.59–3.48) and stroke (HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.06–1.99) (all p < .05). Higher PP/SVi also predicts higher rate of hospitalization for HF (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.48–3.12) and a 52% higher hazard of all-cause mortality (95% CI 1.10–2.09) (both p < .05). In hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, higher PP/SVi was associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信