香港大学生标准急救知识与训练偏好的横断面调查

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sze Nok Ng, Lok Kan Tang, Chi Kei Leung, Chung Yi Cheng, Mei Shan Cheung, Yuet Yee Lam, Leong Ching Yeung, Yung Ting Tse, Wing Han Tai, P. Chau
{"title":"香港大学生标准急救知识与训练偏好的横断面调查","authors":"Sze Nok Ng, Lok Kan Tang, Chi Kei Leung, Chung Yi Cheng, Mei Shan Cheung, Yuet Yee Lam, Leong Ching Yeung, Yung Ting Tse, Wing Han Tai, P. Chau","doi":"10.1177/10249079211050148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The study aimed to assess the level of standard first aid knowledge among Hong Kong undergraduates and identify the associated factors, and to examine their attitudes, training preferences and obstacles in first aid training. Methods: This cross-sectional study employed a structured online questionnaire covering demographic data, first aid knowledge assessment and attitude evaluation. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling from August to October 2020. Inclusion criteria included full-time undergraduates studying for the first degree in Hong Kong and receiving primary and secondary education in Hong Kong. To contrast undergraduates studying medical and non-medical degrees, a set ratio of 1:1 was employed, and estimated proportions were weighted according to the ratio of medical and non-medical undergraduates in the population. Unweighted data were used in logistic regressions. Results: Among 385 respondents, the weighted proportion of good knowledge of standard first aid was 15.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.6%–18.8%) and that of good attitudes towards standard first aid was 71.3% (95% CI: 66.8%–75.8%). Holding valid or expired standard first aid certificates (valid: odds ratio (OR) = 9.897, p < 0.001; expired: OR = 4.816, p < 0.001) and studying medical-related degrees (OR = 3.693, p < 0.001) were shown by multiple logistic regression to be associated with good knowledge of standard first aid. Only being a current or past member of first aid cadet teams was associated with a greater likelihood of having good attitudes towards first aid (OR = 2.336, p = 0.047). Respondents proposed standard first aid training should take form of credit-bearing or non-credit-bearing courses in university curriculum, and academic workload should be taken into account when designing training schemes. Conclusion: The proportion of undergraduates in Hong Kong with good first aid knowledge was unsatisfactory, but the counterpart with a good attitude was encouraging. Standard first aid training should be proactively provided to all the local undergraduates, regardless of their enrollment in medical- or non-medical-related degrees.","PeriodicalId":50401,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and training preference of standard first aid among undergraduates in Hong Kong: A cross-sectional survey\",\"authors\":\"Sze Nok Ng, Lok Kan Tang, Chi Kei Leung, Chung Yi Cheng, Mei Shan Cheung, Yuet Yee Lam, Leong Ching Yeung, Yung Ting Tse, Wing Han Tai, P. Chau\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10249079211050148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The study aimed to assess the level of standard first aid knowledge among Hong Kong undergraduates and identify the associated factors, and to examine their attitudes, training preferences and obstacles in first aid training. Methods: This cross-sectional study employed a structured online questionnaire covering demographic data, first aid knowledge assessment and attitude evaluation. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling from August to October 2020. Inclusion criteria included full-time undergraduates studying for the first degree in Hong Kong and receiving primary and secondary education in Hong Kong. To contrast undergraduates studying medical and non-medical degrees, a set ratio of 1:1 was employed, and estimated proportions were weighted according to the ratio of medical and non-medical undergraduates in the population. Unweighted data were used in logistic regressions. Results: Among 385 respondents, the weighted proportion of good knowledge of standard first aid was 15.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.6%–18.8%) and that of good attitudes towards standard first aid was 71.3% (95% CI: 66.8%–75.8%). Holding valid or expired standard first aid certificates (valid: odds ratio (OR) = 9.897, p < 0.001; expired: OR = 4.816, p < 0.001) and studying medical-related degrees (OR = 3.693, p < 0.001) were shown by multiple logistic regression to be associated with good knowledge of standard first aid. Only being a current or past member of first aid cadet teams was associated with a greater likelihood of having good attitudes towards first aid (OR = 2.336, p = 0.047). Respondents proposed standard first aid training should take form of credit-bearing or non-credit-bearing courses in university curriculum, and academic workload should be taken into account when designing training schemes. Conclusion: The proportion of undergraduates in Hong Kong with good first aid knowledge was unsatisfactory, but the counterpart with a good attitude was encouraging. Standard first aid training should be proactively provided to all the local undergraduates, regardless of their enrollment in medical- or non-medical-related degrees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10249079211050148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10249079211050148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

前言:本研究旨在评估香港本科生的标准急救知识水平及相关因素,并探讨他们对急救培训的态度、培训偏好及障碍。方法:本研究采用结构化的在线调查问卷,包括人口统计资料、急救知识评估和态度评估。参与者于2020年8月至10月采用方便抽样方式招募。纳入标准包括在香港修读第一学位及在香港接受小学及中学教育的全日制本科生。为了对比医学和非医学学位的本科生,采用1:1的固定比例,并根据医学和非医学本科生在人口中的比例对估计比例进行加权。未加权数据用于逻辑回归。结果:385名受访者中,对标准急救有良好认识的权重比例为15.2%(95%置信区间(CI): 11.6% ~ 18.8%),对标准急救有良好态度的权重比例为71.3% (95% CI: 66.8% ~ 75.8%)。持有有效或过期的标准急救证书(有效:优势比(or) = 9.897, p < 0.001;过期:OR = 4.816, p < 0.001)和学习医学相关学位(OR = 3.693, p < 0.001)与良好的标准急救知识相关。只有现在或过去是急救学员队的成员,才更有可能对急救有良好的态度(or = 2.336, p = 0.047)。受访者建议标准的急救培训应在大学课程中采用学分或非学分课程的形式,并且在设计培训方案时应考虑到学术工作量。结论:香港大学生掌握良好急救知识的比例不理想,但态度良好的比例令人鼓舞。应主动向所有本地本科生提供标准的急救培训,无论他们是否就读于医学相关学位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and training preference of standard first aid among undergraduates in Hong Kong: A cross-sectional survey
Introduction: The study aimed to assess the level of standard first aid knowledge among Hong Kong undergraduates and identify the associated factors, and to examine their attitudes, training preferences and obstacles in first aid training. Methods: This cross-sectional study employed a structured online questionnaire covering demographic data, first aid knowledge assessment and attitude evaluation. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling from August to October 2020. Inclusion criteria included full-time undergraduates studying for the first degree in Hong Kong and receiving primary and secondary education in Hong Kong. To contrast undergraduates studying medical and non-medical degrees, a set ratio of 1:1 was employed, and estimated proportions were weighted according to the ratio of medical and non-medical undergraduates in the population. Unweighted data were used in logistic regressions. Results: Among 385 respondents, the weighted proportion of good knowledge of standard first aid was 15.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.6%–18.8%) and that of good attitudes towards standard first aid was 71.3% (95% CI: 66.8%–75.8%). Holding valid or expired standard first aid certificates (valid: odds ratio (OR) = 9.897, p < 0.001; expired: OR = 4.816, p < 0.001) and studying medical-related degrees (OR = 3.693, p < 0.001) were shown by multiple logistic regression to be associated with good knowledge of standard first aid. Only being a current or past member of first aid cadet teams was associated with a greater likelihood of having good attitudes towards first aid (OR = 2.336, p = 0.047). Respondents proposed standard first aid training should take form of credit-bearing or non-credit-bearing courses in university curriculum, and academic workload should be taken into account when designing training schemes. Conclusion: The proportion of undergraduates in Hong Kong with good first aid knowledge was unsatisfactory, but the counterpart with a good attitude was encouraging. Standard first aid training should be proactively provided to all the local undergraduates, regardless of their enrollment in medical- or non-medical-related degrees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which focusses on all aspects of clinical practice and emergency medicine research in the hospital and pre-hospital setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信