{"title":"合作与冲突之间:1973-2014年后殖民时期斯瓦蒂尼劳工与民主政治的互动模式","authors":"Sifiso Hlandze","doi":"10.1080/02589001.2021.1966398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Nearly five decades after the end of multi-party democracy, Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) is experiencing growing support for re-democratisation. This article explores the patterns of interaction between the labour movement and pro-democracy political forces in post-colonial Eswatini. The relationship between labour and pro-democracy forces has gone through both collaboration and conflict, and should be analysed in terms of multiple context-specific factors. Many workers realised that their welfare would not improve under the authoritarian rule of the traditional monarchy. However, between 1973 and 2014, there is no evidence of unified workers’ support for a pro-democracy agenda. Workers regularly took to the street to manifest their discontent with appalling living and working conditions, and pro-democracy forces both within and outside the labour movement, were able to rise to the occasion to rally support for multi-party democracy. Despite this, many workers favoured trade unions that focused primarily on economic, rather than political matters.","PeriodicalId":51744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary African Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"214 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between collaboration and conflict: patterns of interaction between labour and pro-democracy politics in post-colonial Eswatini, 1973–2014\",\"authors\":\"Sifiso Hlandze\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589001.2021.1966398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Nearly five decades after the end of multi-party democracy, Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) is experiencing growing support for re-democratisation. This article explores the patterns of interaction between the labour movement and pro-democracy political forces in post-colonial Eswatini. The relationship between labour and pro-democracy forces has gone through both collaboration and conflict, and should be analysed in terms of multiple context-specific factors. Many workers realised that their welfare would not improve under the authoritarian rule of the traditional monarchy. However, between 1973 and 2014, there is no evidence of unified workers’ support for a pro-democracy agenda. Workers regularly took to the street to manifest their discontent with appalling living and working conditions, and pro-democracy forces both within and outside the labour movement, were able to rise to the occasion to rally support for multi-party democracy. Despite this, many workers favoured trade unions that focused primarily on economic, rather than political matters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary African Studies\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"214 - 228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2021.1966398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2021.1966398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Between collaboration and conflict: patterns of interaction between labour and pro-democracy politics in post-colonial Eswatini, 1973–2014
ABSTRACT Nearly five decades after the end of multi-party democracy, Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) is experiencing growing support for re-democratisation. This article explores the patterns of interaction between the labour movement and pro-democracy political forces in post-colonial Eswatini. The relationship between labour and pro-democracy forces has gone through both collaboration and conflict, and should be analysed in terms of multiple context-specific factors. Many workers realised that their welfare would not improve under the authoritarian rule of the traditional monarchy. However, between 1973 and 2014, there is no evidence of unified workers’ support for a pro-democracy agenda. Workers regularly took to the street to manifest their discontent with appalling living and working conditions, and pro-democracy forces both within and outside the labour movement, were able to rise to the occasion to rally support for multi-party democracy. Despite this, many workers favoured trade unions that focused primarily on economic, rather than political matters.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Contemporary African Studies (JCAS) is an interdisciplinary journal seeking to promote an African-centred scholarly understanding of societies on the continent and their location within the global political economy. Its scope extends across a wide range of social science and humanities disciplines with topics covered including, but not limited to, culture, development, education, environmental questions, gender, government, labour, land, leadership, political economy politics, social movements, sociology of knowledge and welfare. JCAS welcomes contributions reviewing general trends in the academic literature with a specific focus on debates and developments in Africa as part of a broader aim of contributing towards the development of viable communities of African scholarship. The journal publishes original research articles, book reviews, notes from the field, debates, research reports and occasional review essays. It also publishes special issues and welcomes proposals for new topics. JCAS is published four times a year, in January, April, July and October.