央行利率政策作为危机前的宏观调控工具

Burenin Aleksey
{"title":"央行利率政策作为危机前的宏观调控工具","authors":"Burenin Aleksey","doi":"10.17265/1548-6583/2020.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why does interest rate policy not work in the economy as economic theory suggests? To understand why, you need to look at the economy from a higher level of abstraction. With this approach, only two states of the economy can be distinguished. The first is a “normal” state; the second is crisis and recession. The “normal” state is the period after the recession and before the next crisis. During this period, the basic laws of the market economy work. During a crisis, the relationship between the level of interest rates and borrowing by households and businesses is broken. This explains the ineffectiveness of the policy of lowering interest rates. Different states of the economy have their own laws, and you cannot extrapolate tools that are successful under “normal” market conditions linearly to the crisis state of the economy. Why does the interest rate policy during the period of the “normal” state of the economy not adjust its development in order to prevent the onset of the crisis? Firstly, the conditions for the emergence of crisis phenomena are created by the interest rate policy at the very beginning of the business cycle, when central banks set and maintain low interest rates for a relatively long period. Secondly, by the end of the business cycle, the credit burden in economy reaches its maximum, so there is no further possibility of expanding effective demand by decreasing interest rates. Thirdly, interest rate policy is an instrument for rough adjustment of the economy, indiscriminately affecting all participants in economic relations. In an attempt to stimulate the economy, the central bank creates the conditions for increasing its imbalance. Fourth, at the end of the business cycle, the interest rate policy does not actually support the real economy, but only the stock market. Fifth, the Fed’s policy has formed a pro-crisis conditioned reflex among market participants. Thus, central banks should leave the determination of the level of interest rates to the free market.","PeriodicalId":71220,"journal":{"name":"现代会计与审计:英文版","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central Bank Interest Rate Policy as a Pro-Crisis Instrument of Macroeconomic Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Burenin Aleksey\",\"doi\":\"10.17265/1548-6583/2020.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why does interest rate policy not work in the economy as economic theory suggests? To understand why, you need to look at the economy from a higher level of abstraction. With this approach, only two states of the economy can be distinguished. The first is a “normal” state; the second is crisis and recession. The “normal” state is the period after the recession and before the next crisis. During this period, the basic laws of the market economy work. During a crisis, the relationship between the level of interest rates and borrowing by households and businesses is broken. This explains the ineffectiveness of the policy of lowering interest rates. Different states of the economy have their own laws, and you cannot extrapolate tools that are successful under “normal” market conditions linearly to the crisis state of the economy. Why does the interest rate policy during the period of the “normal” state of the economy not adjust its development in order to prevent the onset of the crisis? Firstly, the conditions for the emergence of crisis phenomena are created by the interest rate policy at the very beginning of the business cycle, when central banks set and maintain low interest rates for a relatively long period. Secondly, by the end of the business cycle, the credit burden in economy reaches its maximum, so there is no further possibility of expanding effective demand by decreasing interest rates. Thirdly, interest rate policy is an instrument for rough adjustment of the economy, indiscriminately affecting all participants in economic relations. In an attempt to stimulate the economy, the central bank creates the conditions for increasing its imbalance. Fourth, at the end of the business cycle, the interest rate policy does not actually support the real economy, but only the stock market. Fifth, the Fed’s policy has formed a pro-crisis conditioned reflex among market participants. Thus, central banks should leave the determination of the level of interest rates to the free market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":71220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"现代会计与审计:英文版\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"现代会计与审计:英文版\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2020.10.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"现代会计与审计:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2020.10.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么利率政策不像经济理论所说的那样在经济中起作用?为了理解原因,你需要从更高的抽象层次来看待经济。通过这种方法,只能区分经济的两种状态。第一种是“正常”状态;二是危机和衰退。“正常”状态是指经济衰退之后到下一次危机之前的一段时间。在这一时期,市场经济的基本规律发挥了作用。在危机期间,利率水平与家庭和企业借贷之间的关系被打破。这就解释了降低利率政策的无效性。不同的经济状态有自己的规律,你不能将在“正常”市场条件下成功的工具线性地外推到经济的危机状态。为什么经济“正常”时期的利率政策没有调整其发展以防止危机的爆发?首先,危机现象出现的条件是由商业周期初期的利率政策创造的,当时各国央行设定并在相对较长的时间内保持低利率。其次,到商业周期结束时,经济中的信贷负担达到最大,因此不存在通过降低利率来扩大有效需求的进一步可能性。第三,利率政策是对经济进行粗略调整的工具,不分青红皂白地影响着经济关系的所有参与者。为了刺激经济,中央银行为加剧经济失衡创造了条件。第四,在商业周期结束时,利率政策实际上并不支持实体经济,只支持股市。第五,美联储的政策在市场参与者中形成了支持危机的条件反射。因此,中央银行应该将利率水平的决定权留给自由市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Central Bank Interest Rate Policy as a Pro-Crisis Instrument of Macroeconomic Regulation
Why does interest rate policy not work in the economy as economic theory suggests? To understand why, you need to look at the economy from a higher level of abstraction. With this approach, only two states of the economy can be distinguished. The first is a “normal” state; the second is crisis and recession. The “normal” state is the period after the recession and before the next crisis. During this period, the basic laws of the market economy work. During a crisis, the relationship between the level of interest rates and borrowing by households and businesses is broken. This explains the ineffectiveness of the policy of lowering interest rates. Different states of the economy have their own laws, and you cannot extrapolate tools that are successful under “normal” market conditions linearly to the crisis state of the economy. Why does the interest rate policy during the period of the “normal” state of the economy not adjust its development in order to prevent the onset of the crisis? Firstly, the conditions for the emergence of crisis phenomena are created by the interest rate policy at the very beginning of the business cycle, when central banks set and maintain low interest rates for a relatively long period. Secondly, by the end of the business cycle, the credit burden in economy reaches its maximum, so there is no further possibility of expanding effective demand by decreasing interest rates. Thirdly, interest rate policy is an instrument for rough adjustment of the economy, indiscriminately affecting all participants in economic relations. In an attempt to stimulate the economy, the central bank creates the conditions for increasing its imbalance. Fourth, at the end of the business cycle, the interest rate policy does not actually support the real economy, but only the stock market. Fifth, the Fed’s policy has formed a pro-crisis conditioned reflex among market participants. Thus, central banks should leave the determination of the level of interest rates to the free market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
930
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信