Munekayi Padingani, N. Dube, S. Chiwanda, N. Gombe, Gerald Shambira, T. Juru, P. Nsubuga, M. Tshimanga
{"title":"2019年,津巴布韦布拉瓦约Galen House的客户满意度","authors":"Munekayi Padingani, N. Dube, S. Chiwanda, N. Gombe, Gerald Shambira, T. Juru, P. Nsubuga, M. Tshimanga","doi":"10.4236/OJEPI.2021.111007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Healthcare industries have seen recent movements towards continuous quality improvement. The healthcare regulators shifted towards a market-driven approach of turning patient satisfaction surveys into a quality improvement tool for overall organizational performance. Data concerning this has remained limited in private sector in Zimbabwe. Thus, this study aims to determine patients and health workers perception about health services offered at Galen house in order to enable the institution to come up with evidence-based interventions to improve the quality of healthcare services. Methods: This was a descriptive cross sectional study. It was a mixed qualitative and quantitative study involving data collected from patients/ guardians and health workers at Galen House from January 2019 to March of the same year. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel version 2013. Results: There were a total of 270 patients involved into the study. 173 (64%) perceived the waiting before services as good. 213 (79%) perceived the total waiting time as not long. Privacy 215 (80%) and confidentiality 223 (83%) perceived as good by patients. More than 50% of health workers perceived health services offered at Galen House as good. Staff attitude was perceived as good 191 (71%) by patients in contrary to some instance by health workers. Affordability of services was perceived as manageable. Conclusion: The total waiting time was perceived as not long at Galen House. Staff attitude was perceived differently by patients and health workers. Improving those two will contribute to more utilization of services by the community.","PeriodicalId":71174,"journal":{"name":"流行病学期刊(英文)","volume":"11 1","pages":"70-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Customer Satisfaction at Galen House, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, 2019\",\"authors\":\"Munekayi Padingani, N. Dube, S. Chiwanda, N. Gombe, Gerald Shambira, T. Juru, P. Nsubuga, M. Tshimanga\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/OJEPI.2021.111007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Healthcare industries have seen recent movements towards continuous quality improvement. The healthcare regulators shifted towards a market-driven approach of turning patient satisfaction surveys into a quality improvement tool for overall organizational performance. Data concerning this has remained limited in private sector in Zimbabwe. Thus, this study aims to determine patients and health workers perception about health services offered at Galen house in order to enable the institution to come up with evidence-based interventions to improve the quality of healthcare services. Methods: This was a descriptive cross sectional study. It was a mixed qualitative and quantitative study involving data collected from patients/ guardians and health workers at Galen House from January 2019 to March of the same year. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel version 2013. Results: There were a total of 270 patients involved into the study. 173 (64%) perceived the waiting before services as good. 213 (79%) perceived the total waiting time as not long. Privacy 215 (80%) and confidentiality 223 (83%) perceived as good by patients. More than 50% of health workers perceived health services offered at Galen House as good. Staff attitude was perceived as good 191 (71%) by patients in contrary to some instance by health workers. Affordability of services was perceived as manageable. Conclusion: The total waiting time was perceived as not long at Galen House. Staff attitude was perceived differently by patients and health workers. Improving those two will contribute to more utilization of services by the community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":71174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"流行病学期刊(英文)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"70-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"流行病学期刊(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJEPI.2021.111007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"流行病学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJEPI.2021.111007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:医疗保健行业最近出现了持续质量改进的趋势。医疗监管机构转向以市场为导向的方法,将患者满意度调查转变为整体组织绩效的质量改进工具。津巴布韦私营部门关于这方面的数据仍然有限。因此,本研究旨在确定患者和卫生工作者对盖伦之家提供的卫生服务的看法,以使该机构能够提出基于证据的干预措施,以提高卫生保健服务的质量。方法:采用描述性横断面研究。这是一项混合定性和定量研究,涉及2019年1月至同年3月从盖伦之家的患者/监护人和卫生工作者那里收集的数据。数据分析使用Microsoft Excel version 2013。结果:共纳入270例患者。173人(64%)认为服务前的等待是好的。213人(79%)认为总等待时间不长。患者认为隐私215(80%)和保密性223(83%)良好。50%以上的卫生工作者认为盖伦之家提供的卫生服务很好。191名(71%)患者认为工作人员的态度良好,而在某些情况下卫生工作者的看法则相反。服务的负担能力被认为是可控的。结论:Galen House的总等待时间不长。患者和卫生工作者对工作人员态度的看法不同。改善这两个方面将有助于社区更多地利用服务。
Customer Satisfaction at Galen House, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, 2019
Introduction: Healthcare industries have seen recent movements towards continuous quality improvement. The healthcare regulators shifted towards a market-driven approach of turning patient satisfaction surveys into a quality improvement tool for overall organizational performance. Data concerning this has remained limited in private sector in Zimbabwe. Thus, this study aims to determine patients and health workers perception about health services offered at Galen house in order to enable the institution to come up with evidence-based interventions to improve the quality of healthcare services. Methods: This was a descriptive cross sectional study. It was a mixed qualitative and quantitative study involving data collected from patients/ guardians and health workers at Galen House from January 2019 to March of the same year. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel version 2013. Results: There were a total of 270 patients involved into the study. 173 (64%) perceived the waiting before services as good. 213 (79%) perceived the total waiting time as not long. Privacy 215 (80%) and confidentiality 223 (83%) perceived as good by patients. More than 50% of health workers perceived health services offered at Galen House as good. Staff attitude was perceived as good 191 (71%) by patients in contrary to some instance by health workers. Affordability of services was perceived as manageable. Conclusion: The total waiting time was perceived as not long at Galen House. Staff attitude was perceived differently by patients and health workers. Improving those two will contribute to more utilization of services by the community.