探讨英语虚拟学习中的课堂互动模式

Magdahalena Tjalla, Marlina Syamsir, Z. Zulfah, Abdul Haris Sunubi, Arqam Arqam
{"title":"探讨英语虚拟学习中的课堂互动模式","authors":"Magdahalena Tjalla, Marlina Syamsir, Z. Zulfah, Abdul Haris Sunubi, Arqam Arqam","doi":"10.25134/erjee.v11i1.7878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This study analyzed classroom interaction patterns in four EFL virtual learning classes at IAIN Parepare: speaking, listening, writing, and reading. The purpose of this study was to give an overview of classroom interaction involving lecturers and students during the learning process. The researchers used a video recorder and field notes to capture the spoken and written interaction during the learning process. Data were transcribed and codified based on the intuitive taxonomy of the discourse act framework of Tsui. Data showed that both in spoken and written interaction, patterns of Initiation-Response (IR), Initiation-Response-Follow up (IRF), and Initiation-Response-Follow Up-Follow Up 2 (IRFF) occurred. In detail, the complete interaction patterns were in listening class, both in spoken and written form. In reading and writing classes, the Initiation-Response (IR) and the Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) occurred. However, in speaking, only Initiation-Response (IR) was produced. In written interaction, except in the listening class, only Initiation-Response (IR) occurred. Data also showed that utterance categories occurred less in written interaction than in spoken. Most of the interactions were done when the lecturer provided information on learning material and instructions on how to do assignments. Thus, there was no feedback given by the lecturer in this interaction. The study also found that the interaction was lecturer-centered, and both the lecturers and the students employed the L1 in the classroom interaction.  ","PeriodicalId":31456,"journal":{"name":"English Review Journal of English Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPLORING CLASSROOM INTERACTION PATTERNS IN EFL VIRTUAL LEARNING\",\"authors\":\"Magdahalena Tjalla, Marlina Syamsir, Z. Zulfah, Abdul Haris Sunubi, Arqam Arqam\",\"doi\":\"10.25134/erjee.v11i1.7878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: This study analyzed classroom interaction patterns in four EFL virtual learning classes at IAIN Parepare: speaking, listening, writing, and reading. The purpose of this study was to give an overview of classroom interaction involving lecturers and students during the learning process. The researchers used a video recorder and field notes to capture the spoken and written interaction during the learning process. Data were transcribed and codified based on the intuitive taxonomy of the discourse act framework of Tsui. Data showed that both in spoken and written interaction, patterns of Initiation-Response (IR), Initiation-Response-Follow up (IRF), and Initiation-Response-Follow Up-Follow Up 2 (IRFF) occurred. In detail, the complete interaction patterns were in listening class, both in spoken and written form. In reading and writing classes, the Initiation-Response (IR) and the Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) occurred. However, in speaking, only Initiation-Response (IR) was produced. In written interaction, except in the listening class, only Initiation-Response (IR) occurred. Data also showed that utterance categories occurred less in written interaction than in spoken. Most of the interactions were done when the lecturer provided information on learning material and instructions on how to do assignments. Thus, there was no feedback given by the lecturer in this interaction. The study also found that the interaction was lecturer-centered, and both the lecturers and the students employed the L1 in the classroom interaction.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":31456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Review Journal of English Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Review Journal of English Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i1.7878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Review Journal of English Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i1.7878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究分析了IAIN Parepare四个英语虚拟学习班的课堂互动模式:口语、听力、写作和阅读。本研究的目的是概述讲师和学生在学习过程中的课堂互动。研究人员使用录像机和现场笔记来捕捉学习过程中的口语和书面互动。基于徐话语行为框架的直观分类法,对数据进行了转录和编纂。数据显示,在口语和书面互动中,都出现了启动反应(IR)、启动反应随访(IRF)和启动反应随访2(IRFF)的模式。详细地说,完整的互动模式出现在听力课上,包括口语和书面形式。在阅读和写作课上,出现了启动反应(IR)和启动反应反馈(IRF)。然而,从理论上讲,只产生了启动响应(IR)。在书面互动中,除了听力课,只发生了启动反应(IR)。数据还显示,话语类别在书面互动中的出现率低于口语。大多数互动都是在讲师提供学习材料信息和如何完成作业的指导时进行的。因此,在这次互动中,讲师没有给出任何反馈。研究还发现,互动是以讲师为中心的,讲师和学生在课堂互动中都采用了L1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPLORING CLASSROOM INTERACTION PATTERNS IN EFL VIRTUAL LEARNING
Abstract: This study analyzed classroom interaction patterns in four EFL virtual learning classes at IAIN Parepare: speaking, listening, writing, and reading. The purpose of this study was to give an overview of classroom interaction involving lecturers and students during the learning process. The researchers used a video recorder and field notes to capture the spoken and written interaction during the learning process. Data were transcribed and codified based on the intuitive taxonomy of the discourse act framework of Tsui. Data showed that both in spoken and written interaction, patterns of Initiation-Response (IR), Initiation-Response-Follow up (IRF), and Initiation-Response-Follow Up-Follow Up 2 (IRFF) occurred. In detail, the complete interaction patterns were in listening class, both in spoken and written form. In reading and writing classes, the Initiation-Response (IR) and the Initiation-Response-Feedback (IRF) occurred. However, in speaking, only Initiation-Response (IR) was produced. In written interaction, except in the listening class, only Initiation-Response (IR) occurred. Data also showed that utterance categories occurred less in written interaction than in spoken. Most of the interactions were done when the lecturer provided information on learning material and instructions on how to do assignments. Thus, there was no feedback given by the lecturer in this interaction. The study also found that the interaction was lecturer-centered, and both the lecturers and the students employed the L1 in the classroom interaction.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信