与四个北美碳捕获和封存项目相关的潜在技术危害

Q3 Decision Sciences
M. Sarkarfarshi, Chris Ladubec, R. Gracie, M. Dusseault, W. Leiss, D. Krewski
{"title":"与四个北美碳捕获和封存项目相关的潜在技术危害","authors":"M. Sarkarfarshi, Chris Ladubec, R. Gracie, M. Dusseault, W. Leiss, D. Krewski","doi":"10.1504/ijram.2019.103341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon capture and storage (CCS) risks depend upon the site geology, potential CO2-caprock reactions, anthropogenic pathways (legacy wellbores), and well construction and operation. Herein, we assess the major risks, termed 'georisks', acknowledging that quantitative description must be site-specific, although pathway impact generalisations are possible. We discuss geological and pathway issues to guide general site selection practices to reduce georisks. Events that trigger hazards and the consequences are presented for leakage, low storage capacity/injectivity, the release of hazardous gases and materials, surface uplift, and Induced seismicity. A supplementary literature-sourced hazard tabulation was developed with focus on four large-scale North American CCS projects (Quest Project, Weyburn Project, Project Pioneer and FutureGen). Each hazard is classified based on the project phase and trigger activity. The risks of CO2, brine, or other fluid leakage through wells (injection, monitoring, decommissioned legacy wells) remain uncertain, but legacy well gas leakage is common, rather than exceptional, despite modern cementing and completion practices.","PeriodicalId":35420,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/ijram.2019.103341","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential technical hazards associated with four North American carbon capture and sequestration projects\",\"authors\":\"M. Sarkarfarshi, Chris Ladubec, R. Gracie, M. Dusseault, W. Leiss, D. Krewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijram.2019.103341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Carbon capture and storage (CCS) risks depend upon the site geology, potential CO2-caprock reactions, anthropogenic pathways (legacy wellbores), and well construction and operation. Herein, we assess the major risks, termed 'georisks', acknowledging that quantitative description must be site-specific, although pathway impact generalisations are possible. We discuss geological and pathway issues to guide general site selection practices to reduce georisks. Events that trigger hazards and the consequences are presented for leakage, low storage capacity/injectivity, the release of hazardous gases and materials, surface uplift, and Induced seismicity. A supplementary literature-sourced hazard tabulation was developed with focus on four large-scale North American CCS projects (Quest Project, Weyburn Project, Project Pioneer and FutureGen). Each hazard is classified based on the project phase and trigger activity. The risks of CO2, brine, or other fluid leakage through wells (injection, monitoring, decommissioned legacy wells) remain uncertain, but legacy well gas leakage is common, rather than exceptional, despite modern cementing and completion practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/ijram.2019.103341\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijram.2019.103341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijram.2019.103341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

碳捕获和储存(CCS)风险取决于现场地质、潜在的二氧化碳盖层反应、人为途径(遗留井筒)以及油井建设和运营。在此,我们评估了被称为“地理风险”的主要风险,承认定量描述必须是特定地点的,尽管通路影响的概括是可能的。我们讨论了地质和路径问题,以指导一般选址实践,减少地理风险。引发危险的事件及其后果包括泄漏、低储存能力/注入能力、有害气体和物质的释放、地表隆起和诱发地震活动。以四个北美大型CCS项目(Quest项目、Weyburn项目、Project Pioneer和FutureGen)为重点,编制了一份补充文献来源的危险列表。根据项目阶段和触发活动对每种危害进行分类。CO2、盐水或其他流体通过井(注入、监测、退役的遗留井)泄漏的风险仍然不确定,但遗留井气体泄漏是常见的,而不是例外,尽管有现代固井和完井实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential technical hazards associated with four North American carbon capture and sequestration projects
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) risks depend upon the site geology, potential CO2-caprock reactions, anthropogenic pathways (legacy wellbores), and well construction and operation. Herein, we assess the major risks, termed 'georisks', acknowledging that quantitative description must be site-specific, although pathway impact generalisations are possible. We discuss geological and pathway issues to guide general site selection practices to reduce georisks. Events that trigger hazards and the consequences are presented for leakage, low storage capacity/injectivity, the release of hazardous gases and materials, surface uplift, and Induced seismicity. A supplementary literature-sourced hazard tabulation was developed with focus on four large-scale North American CCS projects (Quest Project, Weyburn Project, Project Pioneer and FutureGen). Each hazard is classified based on the project phase and trigger activity. The risks of CO2, brine, or other fluid leakage through wells (injection, monitoring, decommissioned legacy wells) remain uncertain, but legacy well gas leakage is common, rather than exceptional, despite modern cementing and completion practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management
International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The IJRAM is an interdisciplinary and refereed journal that provides cross learning between: - Different business and economics, as well as scientific and technological, disciplines - Energy industries, environmental and ecological systems - Safety, public health and medical services - Software services, reliability and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信