记忆、复仇与政治暴力——希腊小说的两个个案研究

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Vasiliki Petsa
{"title":"记忆、复仇与政治暴力——希腊小说的两个个案研究","authors":"Vasiliki Petsa","doi":"10.14321/JSTUDRADI.11.1.0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"C ombined considerations of the terms “political violence” and “fiction” normally fall within two contiguous research fields, each employing disparate theoretical frameworks, methodological tools, and sets of questions. Scholars from disciplines as diverse as political sociology, cultural studies, and cultural anthropology attempting to move beyond absolutist or deceptively objectivist accounts of violence focus on its status as a variable, contextually specific discursive construction pertinent to politically motivated narratives. The second approach deals with representations of political violence in various cultural forms and genres (films, theater productions, novels, etc.), raising questions regarding the fictionalization of contested histories and audience/reader responses. Viewing literature as a specific embodiment of “cultural memory,” we hold that, despite being an ideologically overdetermined form of social discourse, it also serves as a “medium for observing the production of cultural memory” regarding, in our case, leftwing disobedience in the wake of a traumatic past. Staging a “production of a production,” in other words constituting “ideology to the second power,” literary texts don’t mirror social reality or history, but, as attentive critiques can reveal, they hold a mirror against ideology, VASILIKI PETSA","PeriodicalId":39186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Study of Radicalism","volume":"11 1","pages":"113 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Memory, Revenge, and Political Violence: Two Case Studies in Greek Fiction\",\"authors\":\"Vasiliki Petsa\",\"doi\":\"10.14321/JSTUDRADI.11.1.0113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"C ombined considerations of the terms “political violence” and “fiction” normally fall within two contiguous research fields, each employing disparate theoretical frameworks, methodological tools, and sets of questions. Scholars from disciplines as diverse as political sociology, cultural studies, and cultural anthropology attempting to move beyond absolutist or deceptively objectivist accounts of violence focus on its status as a variable, contextually specific discursive construction pertinent to politically motivated narratives. The second approach deals with representations of political violence in various cultural forms and genres (films, theater productions, novels, etc.), raising questions regarding the fictionalization of contested histories and audience/reader responses. Viewing literature as a specific embodiment of “cultural memory,” we hold that, despite being an ideologically overdetermined form of social discourse, it also serves as a “medium for observing the production of cultural memory” regarding, in our case, leftwing disobedience in the wake of a traumatic past. Staging a “production of a production,” in other words constituting “ideology to the second power,” literary texts don’t mirror social reality or history, but, as attentive critiques can reveal, they hold a mirror against ideology, VASILIKI PETSA\",\"PeriodicalId\":39186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Study of Radicalism\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Study of Radicalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14321/JSTUDRADI.11.1.0113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Study of Radicalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/JSTUDRADI.11.1.0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对“政治暴力”和“小说”这两个术语的综合考虑通常属于两个相邻的研究领域,每个领域都采用不同的理论框架、方法工具和一系列问题。来自政治社会学、文化研究和文化人类学等不同学科的学者试图超越绝对主义或具有欺骗性的客观主义对暴力的描述,他们将重点放在暴力作为一种变量的地位上,即与政治动机叙事相关的特定语境的话语结构。第二种方法处理各种文化形式和类型(电影,戏剧作品,小说等)中政治暴力的表现,提出了关于有争议的历史和观众/读者反应的虚构化的问题。将文学视为“文化记忆”的具体体现,我们认为,尽管文学是一种意识形态上被过度决定的社会话语形式,但它也作为一种“观察文化记忆产生的媒介”,在我们的案例中,它涉及到左翼在创伤过去之后的不服从。文学文本上演了“作品的作品”,换句话说,构成了“第二权力的意识形态”,它并不反映社会现实或历史,但是,正如细心的评论家所揭示的那样,它们是一面反对意识形态的镜子
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Memory, Revenge, and Political Violence: Two Case Studies in Greek Fiction
C ombined considerations of the terms “political violence” and “fiction” normally fall within two contiguous research fields, each employing disparate theoretical frameworks, methodological tools, and sets of questions. Scholars from disciplines as diverse as political sociology, cultural studies, and cultural anthropology attempting to move beyond absolutist or deceptively objectivist accounts of violence focus on its status as a variable, contextually specific discursive construction pertinent to politically motivated narratives. The second approach deals with representations of political violence in various cultural forms and genres (films, theater productions, novels, etc.), raising questions regarding the fictionalization of contested histories and audience/reader responses. Viewing literature as a specific embodiment of “cultural memory,” we hold that, despite being an ideologically overdetermined form of social discourse, it also serves as a “medium for observing the production of cultural memory” regarding, in our case, leftwing disobedience in the wake of a traumatic past. Staging a “production of a production,” in other words constituting “ideology to the second power,” literary texts don’t mirror social reality or history, but, as attentive critiques can reveal, they hold a mirror against ideology, VASILIKI PETSA
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Study of Radicalism
Journal of the Study of Radicalism Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信