一个集合的谱系:与手稿图书馆目录工作

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Cromohs Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI:10.36253/CROMOHS-12027
J. Weis
{"title":"一个集合的谱系:与手稿图书馆目录工作","authors":"J. Weis","doi":"10.36253/CROMOHS-12027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1773 Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, at that time librarian of the ducal library in Wolfenbüttel, criticised his predecessors of only being interested in the history of the library’s augmentation, of the library’s „genealogy“.  According to the famous writer, former librarians were so fixated on the catalogues that they forgot the real purpose of telling a collection’s history: showing how it contributed to scholarship. Of course, Lessing has a point, the history of a collection and its holding institution should not be told simply by enumerating objects, but he might have underestimated the potential of catalogues and book lists as sources for the history of scholarship, indeed the history of knowledge. Library catalogues should not only be seen as valuable sources for the reconstruction of an as-is state of the library at a specific moment of the collection’s life but that a much broader perspective can be taken. Using the example of the Wolfenbüttel manuscript catalogues dating from the mid-17th to the 18th century, the catalogues can be read as behavioural guidelines, as an instrument for representation, as a witness for scholarly practices or as legal papers. Just as for literary documents, they invite to read between the lines, to analyse their specific style as well as to discover the different communicative strategies and hidden messages. Using Lessing’s image, the catalogues help with the composition of an enhanced genealogy, positioning every item into a network of objects, texts, practices, and ideas.","PeriodicalId":38885,"journal":{"name":"Cromohs","volume":"23 1","pages":"135-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Genealogy of a Collection: Working with Manuscript Library Catalogues\",\"authors\":\"J. Weis\",\"doi\":\"10.36253/CROMOHS-12027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1773 Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, at that time librarian of the ducal library in Wolfenbüttel, criticised his predecessors of only being interested in the history of the library’s augmentation, of the library’s „genealogy“.  According to the famous writer, former librarians were so fixated on the catalogues that they forgot the real purpose of telling a collection’s history: showing how it contributed to scholarship. Of course, Lessing has a point, the history of a collection and its holding institution should not be told simply by enumerating objects, but he might have underestimated the potential of catalogues and book lists as sources for the history of scholarship, indeed the history of knowledge. Library catalogues should not only be seen as valuable sources for the reconstruction of an as-is state of the library at a specific moment of the collection’s life but that a much broader perspective can be taken. Using the example of the Wolfenbüttel manuscript catalogues dating from the mid-17th to the 18th century, the catalogues can be read as behavioural guidelines, as an instrument for representation, as a witness for scholarly practices or as legal papers. Just as for literary documents, they invite to read between the lines, to analyse their specific style as well as to discover the different communicative strategies and hidden messages. Using Lessing’s image, the catalogues help with the composition of an enhanced genealogy, positioning every item into a network of objects, texts, practices, and ideas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cromohs\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"135-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cromohs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36253/CROMOHS-12027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cromohs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/CROMOHS-12027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1773年,时任Wolfenbüttel公爵图书馆馆长的戈特霍尔德·埃法莲·莱辛批评他的前任只对图书馆扩建的历史感兴趣,图书馆的家谱”。根据这位著名作家的说法,以前的图书馆员过于专注于目录,以至于忘记了讲述藏品历史的真正目的:展示藏品如何为学术做出贡献。当然,莱辛有一点,藏品的历史及其持有机构不应仅仅通过列举物品来讲述,但他可能低估了目录的潜力gues和书籍列表是学术史,实际上是知识史的来源。图书馆目录不仅应该被视为在藏品生命的特定时刻重建图书馆现状的宝贵来源,而且可以从更广泛的角度看待。以17世纪中期至18世纪的Wolfenbüttel手稿目录为例,这些目录可以被解读为行为指南、代表工具、学术实践的见证人或法律文件。就像文学文献一样,他们邀请读者阅读字里行间的内容,分析其具体风格,并发现不同的交际策略和隐藏的信息。使用莱辛的图像,目录有助于构建一个增强的谱系,将每一项都定位到对象、文本、实践和思想的网络中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Genealogy of a Collection: Working with Manuscript Library Catalogues
In 1773 Gotthold Ephraim Lessing, at that time librarian of the ducal library in Wolfenbüttel, criticised his predecessors of only being interested in the history of the library’s augmentation, of the library’s „genealogy“.  According to the famous writer, former librarians were so fixated on the catalogues that they forgot the real purpose of telling a collection’s history: showing how it contributed to scholarship. Of course, Lessing has a point, the history of a collection and its holding institution should not be told simply by enumerating objects, but he might have underestimated the potential of catalogues and book lists as sources for the history of scholarship, indeed the history of knowledge. Library catalogues should not only be seen as valuable sources for the reconstruction of an as-is state of the library at a specific moment of the collection’s life but that a much broader perspective can be taken. Using the example of the Wolfenbüttel manuscript catalogues dating from the mid-17th to the 18th century, the catalogues can be read as behavioural guidelines, as an instrument for representation, as a witness for scholarly practices or as legal papers. Just as for literary documents, they invite to read between the lines, to analyse their specific style as well as to discover the different communicative strategies and hidden messages. Using Lessing’s image, the catalogues help with the composition of an enhanced genealogy, positioning every item into a network of objects, texts, practices, and ideas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cromohs
Cromohs Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信