Psyche的起源

Q4 Psychology

International Journal of Jungian Studies Pub Date : 2021-10-08 DOI:10.1163/19409060-bja10016

E. Goodwyn

{"title":"Psyche的起源","authors":"E. Goodwyn","doi":"10.1163/19409060-bja10016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper follows the ongoing discussion with philosopher and psychoanalyst Jon Mills (2020) regarding the nature, origin, and essence of the archetype and psyche, in which my approach that incorporates key features of the philosophy of mind is being compared and contrasted with Mills’ onto-phenomenal approach. Both Mills and I come at this question from very different backgrounds, making interdisciplinary work challenging but rewarding. In this paper I will attempt to start from Mills’ foundational position to bridge the two frameworks together.","PeriodicalId":38977,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Jungian Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Origins of Psyche\",\"authors\":\"E. Goodwyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/19409060-bja10016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper follows the ongoing discussion with philosopher and psychoanalyst Jon Mills (2020) regarding the nature, origin, and essence of the archetype and psyche, in which my approach that incorporates key features of the philosophy of mind is being compared and contrasted with Mills’ onto-phenomenal approach. Both Mills and I come at this question from very different backgrounds, making interdisciplinary work challenging but rewarding. In this paper I will attempt to start from Mills’ foundational position to bridge the two frameworks together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Jungian Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Jungian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/19409060-bja10016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Jungian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/19409060-bja10016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文遵循了与哲学家和精神分析学家乔恩·米尔斯(2020)关于原型和心灵的本质、起源和本质的持续讨论，其中我的方法结合了心灵哲学的关键特征，与米尔斯的本体现象方法进行了比较和对比。米尔斯和我研究这个问题的背景非常不同，这使得跨学科的工作具有挑战性，但也有回报。在本文中，我将尝试从米尔斯的基本立场出发，将这两个框架连接在一起。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Origins of Psyche

This paper follows the ongoing discussion with philosopher and psychoanalyst Jon Mills (2020) regarding the nature, origin, and essence of the archetype and psyche, in which my approach that incorporates key features of the philosophy of mind is being compared and contrasted with Mills’ onto-phenomenal approach. Both Mills and I come at this question from very different backgrounds, making interdisciplinary work challenging but rewarding. In this paper I will attempt to start from Mills’ foundational position to bridge the two frameworks together.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Jungian Studies Psychology-Applied Psychology

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量