{"title":"使用基于树的助推模型对不同飞行计划范围的低能见度预测","authors":"S. Dietz, P. Kneringer, G. Mayr, A. Zeileis","doi":"10.5194/ASCMO-5-101-2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Low-visibility conditions enforce special procedures that reduce the\noperational flight capacity at airports. Accurate and probabilistic forecasts\nof these capacity-reducing low-visibility procedure (lvp) states help the\nair traffic management in optimizing flight planning and regulation. In this\npaper, we investigate nowcasts, medium-range forecasts, and the\npredictability limit of the lvp states at Vienna International Airport. The forecasts are\ngenerated with boosting trees, which outperform persistence, climatology,\ndirect output of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, and ordered\nlogistic regression. The boosting trees consist of an ensemble of decision\ntrees grown iteratively on information from previous trees. Their input is\nobservations at Vienna International Airport as well as output of a high resolution and an\nensemble NWP model. Observations have the highest impact for nowcasts up to a\nlead time of +2 h. Afterwards, a mix of observations and NWP forecast\nvariables generates the most accurate predictions. With lead times longer\nthan +7 h, NWP output dominates until the predictability limit is reached\nat +12 d. For lead times longer than +2 d, output from an ensemble of\nNWP models improves the forecast more than using a deterministic but finer\nresolved NWP model. The most important predictors for lead times up to\n+18 h are observations of lvp and dew point depression as well as NWP\ndew point depression. At longer lead times, dew point depression and\nevaporation from the NWP models are most important.\n","PeriodicalId":36792,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-visibility forecasts for different flight planning horizons using tree-based boosting models\",\"authors\":\"S. Dietz, P. Kneringer, G. Mayr, A. Zeileis\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/ASCMO-5-101-2019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Low-visibility conditions enforce special procedures that reduce the\\noperational flight capacity at airports. Accurate and probabilistic forecasts\\nof these capacity-reducing low-visibility procedure (lvp) states help the\\nair traffic management in optimizing flight planning and regulation. In this\\npaper, we investigate nowcasts, medium-range forecasts, and the\\npredictability limit of the lvp states at Vienna International Airport. The forecasts are\\ngenerated with boosting trees, which outperform persistence, climatology,\\ndirect output of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, and ordered\\nlogistic regression. The boosting trees consist of an ensemble of decision\\ntrees grown iteratively on information from previous trees. Their input is\\nobservations at Vienna International Airport as well as output of a high resolution and an\\nensemble NWP model. Observations have the highest impact for nowcasts up to a\\nlead time of +2 h. Afterwards, a mix of observations and NWP forecast\\nvariables generates the most accurate predictions. With lead times longer\\nthan +7 h, NWP output dominates until the predictability limit is reached\\nat +12 d. For lead times longer than +2 d, output from an ensemble of\\nNWP models improves the forecast more than using a deterministic but finer\\nresolved NWP model. The most important predictors for lead times up to\\n+18 h are observations of lvp and dew point depression as well as NWP\\ndew point depression. At longer lead times, dew point depression and\\nevaporation from the NWP models are most important.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/ASCMO-5-101-2019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/ASCMO-5-101-2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low-visibility forecasts for different flight planning horizons using tree-based boosting models
Abstract. Low-visibility conditions enforce special procedures that reduce the
operational flight capacity at airports. Accurate and probabilistic forecasts
of these capacity-reducing low-visibility procedure (lvp) states help the
air traffic management in optimizing flight planning and regulation. In this
paper, we investigate nowcasts, medium-range forecasts, and the
predictability limit of the lvp states at Vienna International Airport. The forecasts are
generated with boosting trees, which outperform persistence, climatology,
direct output of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, and ordered
logistic regression. The boosting trees consist of an ensemble of decision
trees grown iteratively on information from previous trees. Their input is
observations at Vienna International Airport as well as output of a high resolution and an
ensemble NWP model. Observations have the highest impact for nowcasts up to a
lead time of +2 h. Afterwards, a mix of observations and NWP forecast
variables generates the most accurate predictions. With lead times longer
than +7 h, NWP output dominates until the predictability limit is reached
at +12 d. For lead times longer than +2 d, output from an ensemble of
NWP models improves the forecast more than using a deterministic but finer
resolved NWP model. The most important predictors for lead times up to
+18 h are observations of lvp and dew point depression as well as NWP
dew point depression. At longer lead times, dew point depression and
evaporation from the NWP models are most important.