从智能手机拍摄的矢状面图像评估中风后步态的下肢角度

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
Yu Kitaji, Haruhiko Sato, Shinnosuke Ishida, Hiroaki Harashima, Satoshi Miyano
{"title":"从智能手机拍摄的矢状面图像评估中风后步态的下肢角度","authors":"Yu Kitaji, Haruhiko Sato, Shinnosuke Ishida, Hiroaki Harashima, Satoshi Miyano","doi":"10.3233/ppr-230739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Clinical gait analysis of sagittal plane lower-limb kinematics using video images is a quantitative tool for clinicians. However, the reliability and validity of limb kinematics after stroke using video images has not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the within-session inter-rater reliability and criterion-related validity of lower limb angles measured in sagittal plane images captured using a smartphone for assessing post-stroke gait and to determine which asymmetric parameters are associated with faster gait velocity. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with stroke were included; video images were recorded as they walked at their preferred pace for 1–3 cycles. Lower limb angles (contact, push-off, and excursion angles) and degree of asymmetry were determined based on video images using markers of acromion, greater trochanter, and fifth metatarsal head. Measurement reliability was calculated using the two-way random effects model of intraclass correlation coefficients and minimal detectable change. The criterion validity investigated Pearson’s correlation between lower limb angles and their asymmetry and gait velocity. RESULTS: The lower value of the 95% confidence interval of intraclass correlation coefficients (2.3) of the lower limb was 0.891, and the maximum minimal detectable change was 9.6 degrees. Push-off angle showed a moderate-to-strong correlation with gait velocity, whereas the asymmetry of the push-off angle showed a weak correlation with gait velocity. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing post-stroke gait utilizing video images using a smartphone is feasible. The push-off angle, in particular, may provide insight into the clinical assessment of post-stroke gait.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing lower limb angles from sagittal plane images captured with a smartphone for post-stroke gait\",\"authors\":\"Yu Kitaji, Haruhiko Sato, Shinnosuke Ishida, Hiroaki Harashima, Satoshi Miyano\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/ppr-230739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Clinical gait analysis of sagittal plane lower-limb kinematics using video images is a quantitative tool for clinicians. However, the reliability and validity of limb kinematics after stroke using video images has not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the within-session inter-rater reliability and criterion-related validity of lower limb angles measured in sagittal plane images captured using a smartphone for assessing post-stroke gait and to determine which asymmetric parameters are associated with faster gait velocity. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with stroke were included; video images were recorded as they walked at their preferred pace for 1–3 cycles. Lower limb angles (contact, push-off, and excursion angles) and degree of asymmetry were determined based on video images using markers of acromion, greater trochanter, and fifth metatarsal head. Measurement reliability was calculated using the two-way random effects model of intraclass correlation coefficients and minimal detectable change. The criterion validity investigated Pearson’s correlation between lower limb angles and their asymmetry and gait velocity. RESULTS: The lower value of the 95% confidence interval of intraclass correlation coefficients (2.3) of the lower limb was 0.891, and the maximum minimal detectable change was 9.6 degrees. Push-off angle showed a moderate-to-strong correlation with gait velocity, whereas the asymmetry of the push-off angle showed a weak correlation with gait velocity. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing post-stroke gait utilizing video images using a smartphone is feasible. The push-off angle, in particular, may provide insight into the clinical assessment of post-stroke gait.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-230739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-230739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用视频图像对矢状面下肢运动学的临床步态分析是临床医生的定量工具。然而,使用视频图像对中风后肢体运动学的可靠性和有效性尚未得到充分研究。目的:本研究旨在检查使用智能手机拍摄的矢状面图像中测量的下肢角度的会话内评分者间可靠性和标准相关有效性,以评估卒中后步态,并确定哪些不对称参数与更快的步态速度相关。方法:纳入32例脑卒中患者;当他们以自己喜欢的速度行走1-3个周期时,视频图像被记录下来。根据视频图像,使用肩峰、大转子和第五跖骨头的标记,确定下肢角度(接触角、推离角和偏移角)和不对称程度。使用组内相关系数和最小可检测变化的双向随机效应模型计算测量可靠性。标准有效性研究了下肢角度及其不对称性和步态速度之间的Pearson相关性。结果:下肢组内相关系数(2.3)的95%置信区间的下限值为0.891,最大最小可检测变化为9.6度。推脱角与步态速度呈中到强相关性,而推脱角的不对称性与步态速度呈正相关。结论:使用智能手机通过视频图像评估中风后步态是可行的。推离角尤其可以为卒中后步态的临床评估提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing lower limb angles from sagittal plane images captured with a smartphone for post-stroke gait
BACKGROUND: Clinical gait analysis of sagittal plane lower-limb kinematics using video images is a quantitative tool for clinicians. However, the reliability and validity of limb kinematics after stroke using video images has not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the within-session inter-rater reliability and criterion-related validity of lower limb angles measured in sagittal plane images captured using a smartphone for assessing post-stroke gait and to determine which asymmetric parameters are associated with faster gait velocity. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with stroke were included; video images were recorded as they walked at their preferred pace for 1–3 cycles. Lower limb angles (contact, push-off, and excursion angles) and degree of asymmetry were determined based on video images using markers of acromion, greater trochanter, and fifth metatarsal head. Measurement reliability was calculated using the two-way random effects model of intraclass correlation coefficients and minimal detectable change. The criterion validity investigated Pearson’s correlation between lower limb angles and their asymmetry and gait velocity. RESULTS: The lower value of the 95% confidence interval of intraclass correlation coefficients (2.3) of the lower limb was 0.891, and the maximum minimal detectable change was 9.6 degrees. Push-off angle showed a moderate-to-strong correlation with gait velocity, whereas the asymmetry of the push-off angle showed a weak correlation with gait velocity. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing post-stroke gait utilizing video images using a smartphone is feasible. The push-off angle, in particular, may provide insight into the clinical assessment of post-stroke gait.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信