患者对替代药物治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的态度:一个中心的经验

Q3 Health Professions
K. Alsaleh, Zeyad Alkhenizan, Abdulelah Aldossari, Ali Alammari, Abdulaziz Dakhil, A. Alzakri
{"title":"患者对替代药物治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的态度:一个中心的经验","authors":"K. Alsaleh, Zeyad Alkhenizan, Abdulelah Aldossari, Ali Alammari, Abdulaziz Dakhil, A. Alzakri","doi":"10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_46_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Despite rapid progress in providing advanced medical care, patients still seek traditional and alternative medicine (AM) therapies for their musculoskeletal complaints. Materials and Methods: A survey of adult patients attending the outpatient orthopedic clinics of a Tertiary Care Institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, was performed. The survey was designed to delineate the patients' demographics, current musculoskeletal complaints, previous history of seeking an alternative treatment modality, and their opinions regarding these AM therapies. Results: One hundred and ninety-six patients agreed to fill the questionnaire. Fifty-four (27.6%) admitted to having had AM in the past. Wet cupping and traditional manual therapy were the most popular AM modalities undertaken, follow closely by herbal treatment and cautery. Age and educational level were found to be associated with the use of AM (P < 0.05). Most participants would never consider using AM, their rationale because it was perceived to be either unsafe or ineffective. Conclusion: AM use for musculoskeletal ailments is still prevalent. It is provision by the untrained and unlicensed individual is a concern. Better access to healthcare, advances in education, and a younger population may decrease its prevalence in the future.","PeriodicalId":33866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"7 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' attitudes toward alternative medicine as a treatment for musculoskeletal conditions: One center's experience\",\"authors\":\"K. Alsaleh, Zeyad Alkhenizan, Abdulelah Aldossari, Ali Alammari, Abdulaziz Dakhil, A. Alzakri\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_46_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Despite rapid progress in providing advanced medical care, patients still seek traditional and alternative medicine (AM) therapies for their musculoskeletal complaints. Materials and Methods: A survey of adult patients attending the outpatient orthopedic clinics of a Tertiary Care Institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, was performed. The survey was designed to delineate the patients' demographics, current musculoskeletal complaints, previous history of seeking an alternative treatment modality, and their opinions regarding these AM therapies. Results: One hundred and ninety-six patients agreed to fill the questionnaire. Fifty-four (27.6%) admitted to having had AM in the past. Wet cupping and traditional manual therapy were the most popular AM modalities undertaken, follow closely by herbal treatment and cautery. Age and educational level were found to be associated with the use of AM (P < 0.05). Most participants would never consider using AM, their rationale because it was perceived to be either unsafe or ineffective. Conclusion: AM use for musculoskeletal ailments is still prevalent. It is provision by the untrained and unlicensed individual is a concern. Better access to healthcare, advances in education, and a younger population may decrease its prevalence in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"7 - 10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_46_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_46_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:尽管在提供高级医疗护理方面取得了快速进展,但患者仍在寻求传统和替代医学(AM)疗法来治疗他们的肌肉骨骼疾病。材料和方法:对沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家三级医疗机构骨科门诊的成年患者进行了调查。该调查旨在描述患者的人口统计数据、当前的肌肉骨骼疾病、以前寻求替代治疗方式的历史,以及他们对这些AM疗法的看法。结果:196名患者同意填写问卷。54人(27.6%)承认过去曾患过AM。湿拔罐和传统手法治疗是最受欢迎的AM治疗方式,紧随其后的是草药治疗和烧灼。年龄和教育水平与AM的使用有关(P<0.05)。大多数参与者永远不会考虑使用AM,他们的理由是AM被认为是不安全或无效的。结论:AM用于肌肉骨骼疾病仍然很普遍。它是由未经培训和未经许可的个人提供的,这是一个令人担忧的问题。更好地获得医疗保健、教育的进步以及人口的年轻化可能会在未来降低其流行率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' attitudes toward alternative medicine as a treatment for musculoskeletal conditions: One center's experience
Introduction: Despite rapid progress in providing advanced medical care, patients still seek traditional and alternative medicine (AM) therapies for their musculoskeletal complaints. Materials and Methods: A survey of adult patients attending the outpatient orthopedic clinics of a Tertiary Care Institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, was performed. The survey was designed to delineate the patients' demographics, current musculoskeletal complaints, previous history of seeking an alternative treatment modality, and their opinions regarding these AM therapies. Results: One hundred and ninety-six patients agreed to fill the questionnaire. Fifty-four (27.6%) admitted to having had AM in the past. Wet cupping and traditional manual therapy were the most popular AM modalities undertaken, follow closely by herbal treatment and cautery. Age and educational level were found to be associated with the use of AM (P < 0.05). Most participants would never consider using AM, their rationale because it was perceived to be either unsafe or ineffective. Conclusion: AM use for musculoskeletal ailments is still prevalent. It is provision by the untrained and unlicensed individual is a concern. Better access to healthcare, advances in education, and a younger population may decrease its prevalence in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信