瑞典数字记录评估的理论、法规和实践

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
E. Klett
{"title":"瑞典数字记录评估的理论、法规和实践","authors":"E. Klett","doi":"10.1108/RMJ-09-2018-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDigital records appraisal and aspects of archival values in theory, regularization and practice are explored. This paper aims to reflect upon the appraisal process, responsibility and norms for value creation in a digitalized environment. The research question was how do appraisal theory, normative rules and appraisal practice meet the aims of values in digital archives?\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study triangulated appraisal theory, normative values and participants’ views about archival values in appraisal practice in a Swedish setting. Content analysis were used to explore normative documents and interviews. Appraisal theories of the Swedish Nils Nilsson and the Canadian Terry Cook were interpreted. The result was related to theories on public values, the nature of responsibility and relations between the state and citizens.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show influences between theory, norms and practice. Changes in norms and practice do not follow the development of digitalization. Responsibility is focused on tasks, which exposes risks of accountability control and knowledge of appraisal grounds. The paper concludes that access requirements and user needs may prompt change in appraisal processes. In the light of digitalization, “primary and secondary value” are merely a matter of use and usability in a time and space (continuum) perspective.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study is based in Sweden where extensive right of access to public records and default preservation are norm.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe result shows how allocated responsibilities impinge on a re-active digital appraisal process.\n","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/RMJ-09-2018-0027","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory, regulation and practice in Swedish digital records appraisal\",\"authors\":\"E. Klett\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/RMJ-09-2018-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nDigital records appraisal and aspects of archival values in theory, regularization and practice are explored. This paper aims to reflect upon the appraisal process, responsibility and norms for value creation in a digitalized environment. The research question was how do appraisal theory, normative rules and appraisal practice meet the aims of values in digital archives?\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe study triangulated appraisal theory, normative values and participants’ views about archival values in appraisal practice in a Swedish setting. Content analysis were used to explore normative documents and interviews. Appraisal theories of the Swedish Nils Nilsson and the Canadian Terry Cook were interpreted. The result was related to theories on public values, the nature of responsibility and relations between the state and citizens.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results show influences between theory, norms and practice. Changes in norms and practice do not follow the development of digitalization. Responsibility is focused on tasks, which exposes risks of accountability control and knowledge of appraisal grounds. The paper concludes that access requirements and user needs may prompt change in appraisal processes. In the light of digitalization, “primary and secondary value” are merely a matter of use and usability in a time and space (continuum) perspective.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study is based in Sweden where extensive right of access to public records and default preservation are norm.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe result shows how allocated responsibilities impinge on a re-active digital appraisal process.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":20923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Records Management Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/RMJ-09-2018-0027\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Records Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2018-0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Records Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2018-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的从理论、规范和实践三个方面探讨数字档案的鉴定及其档案价值。本文旨在反思数字化环境下价值创造的评估过程、责任和规范。研究问题是,数字档案中的评估理论、规范规则和评估实践如何满足价值目标?设计/方法论/方法本研究在瑞典的评估实践中,对评估理论、规范价值观和参与者对档案价值的看法进行了三角分析。内容分析用于探讨规范性文件和访谈。对瑞典人尼尔斯·尼尔森和加拿大人特里·库克的评价理论进行了阐释。这一结果与关于公共价值观、责任性质以及国家与公民关系的理论有关。研究结果表明理论、规范和实践之间存在着相互影响。规范和实践的变化并不跟随数字化的发展。责任集中在任务上,这暴露了责任控制和评估依据知识的风险。论文的结论是,访问需求和用户需求可能会促使评估过程发生变化。从数字化的角度来看,“主要和次要价值”只是时间和空间(连续体)角度的使用和可用性问题。研究局限性/含义本研究基于瑞典,在瑞典,广泛的公共记录访问权和默认保存权是常态。独创性/价值结果显示了分配的责任如何影响重新激活的数字评估过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theory, regulation and practice in Swedish digital records appraisal
Purpose Digital records appraisal and aspects of archival values in theory, regularization and practice are explored. This paper aims to reflect upon the appraisal process, responsibility and norms for value creation in a digitalized environment. The research question was how do appraisal theory, normative rules and appraisal practice meet the aims of values in digital archives? Design/methodology/approach The study triangulated appraisal theory, normative values and participants’ views about archival values in appraisal practice in a Swedish setting. Content analysis were used to explore normative documents and interviews. Appraisal theories of the Swedish Nils Nilsson and the Canadian Terry Cook were interpreted. The result was related to theories on public values, the nature of responsibility and relations between the state and citizens. Findings The results show influences between theory, norms and practice. Changes in norms and practice do not follow the development of digitalization. Responsibility is focused on tasks, which exposes risks of accountability control and knowledge of appraisal grounds. The paper concludes that access requirements and user needs may prompt change in appraisal processes. In the light of digitalization, “primary and secondary value” are merely a matter of use and usability in a time and space (continuum) perspective. Research limitations/implications This study is based in Sweden where extensive right of access to public records and default preservation are norm. Originality/value The result shows how allocated responsibilities impinge on a re-active digital appraisal process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Records Management Journal
Records Management Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: ■Electronic records management ■Effect of government policies on record management ■Strategic developments in both the public and private sectors ■Systems design and implementation ■Models for records management ■Best practice, standards and guidelines ■Risk management and business continuity ■Performance measurement ■Continuing professional development ■Consortia and co-operation ■Marketing ■Preservation ■Legal and ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信