{"title":"用算法微分法计算电磁整形中的形状导数","authors":"Karsten Eppler sci","doi":"10.4208/jms.v52n3.19.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shape optimization based on analytical shape derivatives is meanwhile a well-established tool in engineering applications. For an appropriate discretization of the underlying problem, the technique of algorithmic differentiation can also be used to provide a discrete analogue of the analytic shape derivative. The present article is concerned with the comparison of both types of gradient calculation and their effects on a gradient-based optimization method with respect to accuracy and performance, since so far only a few attempts have been made to compare these approaches. For this purpose, the article discusses both techniques and analyses the obtained numerical results for a generic test case from electromagnetic shaping. Since good agreement of both methods is found, algorithmic differentiation seems to be worthwhile to be used also for more demanding shape optimization problems. AMS subject classifications: 49M25, 49Q10, 78M15","PeriodicalId":43526,"journal":{"name":"数学研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computation of Shape Derivatives in Electromagnetic Shaping by Algorithmic Differentiation\",\"authors\":\"Karsten Eppler sci\",\"doi\":\"10.4208/jms.v52n3.19.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shape optimization based on analytical shape derivatives is meanwhile a well-established tool in engineering applications. For an appropriate discretization of the underlying problem, the technique of algorithmic differentiation can also be used to provide a discrete analogue of the analytic shape derivative. The present article is concerned with the comparison of both types of gradient calculation and their effects on a gradient-based optimization method with respect to accuracy and performance, since so far only a few attempts have been made to compare these approaches. For this purpose, the article discusses both techniques and analyses the obtained numerical results for a generic test case from electromagnetic shaping. Since good agreement of both methods is found, algorithmic differentiation seems to be worthwhile to be used also for more demanding shape optimization problems. AMS subject classifications: 49M25, 49Q10, 78M15\",\"PeriodicalId\":43526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"数学研究\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"数学研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4208/jms.v52n3.19.01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"数学研究","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4208/jms.v52n3.19.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Computation of Shape Derivatives in Electromagnetic Shaping by Algorithmic Differentiation
Shape optimization based on analytical shape derivatives is meanwhile a well-established tool in engineering applications. For an appropriate discretization of the underlying problem, the technique of algorithmic differentiation can also be used to provide a discrete analogue of the analytic shape derivative. The present article is concerned with the comparison of both types of gradient calculation and their effects on a gradient-based optimization method with respect to accuracy and performance, since so far only a few attempts have been made to compare these approaches. For this purpose, the article discusses both techniques and analyses the obtained numerical results for a generic test case from electromagnetic shaping. Since good agreement of both methods is found, algorithmic differentiation seems to be worthwhile to be used also for more demanding shape optimization problems. AMS subject classifications: 49M25, 49Q10, 78M15
期刊介绍:
Journal of Mathematical Study (JMS) is a comprehensive mathematical journal published jointly by Global Science Press and Xiamen University. It publishes original research and survey papers, in English, of high scientific value in all major fields of mathematics, including pure mathematics, applied mathematics, operational research, and computational mathematics.