埃塞俄比亚联邦税务上诉委员会的税务上诉程序:批判性反思

Q4 Social Sciences
Aschalew Ashagre Byness
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚联邦税务上诉委员会的税务上诉程序:批判性反思","authors":"Aschalew Ashagre Byness","doi":"10.4314/MLR.V14I2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the 2016 Federal Tax Administration Proclamation (FTAP), it is by way of appeal that taxpayers reach the judiciary when they can show that the Federal Tax Appeal Commission (FTAC) has committed an error of law.  As far as factual issues are concerned, the decision of the FTAC is thus final and conclusive. Ethiopia’s tax dispute resolution system has made improvements although there has been discontent on the part of taxpayers. This article examines the tax appeal processes at the federal level to see whether the processes enhance fair play between taxpayers and the tax authority. Specifically, the article evaluates whether there are clear and adequate procedural rules that ensure access to justice for aggrieved taxpayers and fair treatment by the Federal Tax Appeal Commission (FTAC). I argue that although there have been certain improvements made by the FTAP (as far as administrative appeal before the FTAC is concerned), there are still some critical shortcomings that have to be reconsidered.","PeriodicalId":30178,"journal":{"name":"Mizan Law Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"201-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax Appeal Proceedings before the Federal Tax Appeal Commission in Ethiopia: Critical Reflections\",\"authors\":\"Aschalew Ashagre Byness\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/MLR.V14I2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Under the 2016 Federal Tax Administration Proclamation (FTAP), it is by way of appeal that taxpayers reach the judiciary when they can show that the Federal Tax Appeal Commission (FTAC) has committed an error of law.  As far as factual issues are concerned, the decision of the FTAC is thus final and conclusive. Ethiopia’s tax dispute resolution system has made improvements although there has been discontent on the part of taxpayers. This article examines the tax appeal processes at the federal level to see whether the processes enhance fair play between taxpayers and the tax authority. Specifically, the article evaluates whether there are clear and adequate procedural rules that ensure access to justice for aggrieved taxpayers and fair treatment by the Federal Tax Appeal Commission (FTAC). I argue that although there have been certain improvements made by the FTAP (as far as administrative appeal before the FTAC is concerned), there are still some critical shortcomings that have to be reconsidered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mizan Law Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"201-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mizan Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/MLR.V14I2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizan Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/MLR.V14I2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据2016年《联邦税务管理公告》(FTAP),当纳税人能够证明联邦税务上诉委员会(FTAC)犯了法律错误时,他们可以通过上诉的方式向司法部门提出上诉。就事实问题而言,自由贸易谈判委员会的决定是最终和决定性的。埃塞俄比亚的税务纠纷解决系统已经有所改善,尽管纳税人对此表示不满。本文考察了联邦层面的税务上诉程序,以了解这些程序是否能促进纳税人和税务机关之间的公平竞争。具体而言,该文章评估了是否有明确和充分的程序规则,以确保受害纳税人获得司法救助,并得到联邦税务上诉委员会(FTAC)的公平待遇。我认为,尽管FTAP已经做出了某些改进(就向FTAC提出的行政上诉而言),但仍有一些重大缺陷需要重新考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tax Appeal Proceedings before the Federal Tax Appeal Commission in Ethiopia: Critical Reflections
Under the 2016 Federal Tax Administration Proclamation (FTAP), it is by way of appeal that taxpayers reach the judiciary when they can show that the Federal Tax Appeal Commission (FTAC) has committed an error of law.  As far as factual issues are concerned, the decision of the FTAC is thus final and conclusive. Ethiopia’s tax dispute resolution system has made improvements although there has been discontent on the part of taxpayers. This article examines the tax appeal processes at the federal level to see whether the processes enhance fair play between taxpayers and the tax authority. Specifically, the article evaluates whether there are clear and adequate procedural rules that ensure access to justice for aggrieved taxpayers and fair treatment by the Federal Tax Appeal Commission (FTAC). I argue that although there have been certain improvements made by the FTAP (as far as administrative appeal before the FTAC is concerned), there are still some critical shortcomings that have to be reconsidered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信