使用倾向评分匹配的人类发展奖金对厄瓜多尔卫生和教育支出的影响

Jessica Guamán, Estefanía Lara, R. Alvarado, Pablo Ponce
{"title":"使用倾向评分匹配的人类发展奖金对厄瓜多尔卫生和教育支出的影响","authors":"Jessica Guamán, Estefanía Lara, R. Alvarado, Pablo Ponce","doi":"10.25097/REP.N30.2019.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to evaluate the effect of the Human Development Bonus on health and education spending in Ecuador using Propensity Score Matching. We use microdata obtained from the 2013-2014 Living Conditions Survey published by the National Institute of Statistics and Census of Ecuador. We estimate two sets of models. In the first, we estimate OLS regressions, where the dependent variable is the amount spent on health and education and the independent variable is whether or not the person receives the Human Development Bonus. In the second, using discrete choice models, we estimate the effect of receiving the BDH on the probability that a person spends on education and health. In order to reduce the bias produced by the non-comparability of the data, we compare the results with PSM and without PSM between those who receive the transfer and those who do not. The results show that BDH beneficiaries spend less on health and education than those who do not. These results are consistent with the incorporation of a set of control variables related to the socioeconomic characteristics of the families. A possible policy implication based on our results is that the conditioned monetary transfer is not fulfilling the objectives of its creation. Consequently, social policies should guarantee that this type of programs are not an instrument of dependence that limits the capacities of people because this prevents the reduction of poverty and inequality.","PeriodicalId":32952,"journal":{"name":"Revista Economia y Politica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efecto del bono de desarrollo humano en el gasto en salud y educación en Ecuador utilizando Propensity Score Matching\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Guamán, Estefanía Lara, R. Alvarado, Pablo Ponce\",\"doi\":\"10.25097/REP.N30.2019.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to evaluate the effect of the Human Development Bonus on health and education spending in Ecuador using Propensity Score Matching. We use microdata obtained from the 2013-2014 Living Conditions Survey published by the National Institute of Statistics and Census of Ecuador. We estimate two sets of models. In the first, we estimate OLS regressions, where the dependent variable is the amount spent on health and education and the independent variable is whether or not the person receives the Human Development Bonus. In the second, using discrete choice models, we estimate the effect of receiving the BDH on the probability that a person spends on education and health. In order to reduce the bias produced by the non-comparability of the data, we compare the results with PSM and without PSM between those who receive the transfer and those who do not. The results show that BDH beneficiaries spend less on health and education than those who do not. These results are consistent with the incorporation of a set of control variables related to the socioeconomic characteristics of the families. A possible policy implication based on our results is that the conditioned monetary transfer is not fulfilling the objectives of its creation. Consequently, social policies should guarantee that this type of programs are not an instrument of dependence that limits the capacities of people because this prevents the reduction of poverty and inequality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Economia y Politica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Economia y Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25097/REP.N30.2019.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Economia y Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25097/REP.N30.2019.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是使用倾向得分匹配来评估人类发展奖金对厄瓜多尔卫生和教育支出的影响。我们使用厄瓜多尔国家统计和人口普查研究所发布的2013-2014年生活条件调查中获得的微观数据。我们估计了两组模型。首先,我们估计了OLS回归,其中因变量是用于健康和教育的金额,自变量是个人是否获得人类发展奖金。第二,使用离散选择模型,我们估计了接受BDH对一个人在教育和健康上花费的概率的影响。为了减少因数据不可比性而产生的偏差,我们将接受转移的人和未接受转移的的人在有PSM和没有PSM的情况下的结果进行了比较。结果显示,BDH受益人在健康和教育方面的支出比没有的人少。这些结果与纳入一组与家庭社会经济特征相关的控制变量一致。根据我们的研究结果,一个可能的政策含义是,有条件的货币转移没有实现其创造的目标。因此,社会政策应确保这类计划不是限制人们能力的依赖工具,因为这会阻止减少贫困和不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efecto del bono de desarrollo humano en el gasto en salud y educación en Ecuador utilizando Propensity Score Matching
The objective of this research is to evaluate the effect of the Human Development Bonus on health and education spending in Ecuador using Propensity Score Matching. We use microdata obtained from the 2013-2014 Living Conditions Survey published by the National Institute of Statistics and Census of Ecuador. We estimate two sets of models. In the first, we estimate OLS regressions, where the dependent variable is the amount spent on health and education and the independent variable is whether or not the person receives the Human Development Bonus. In the second, using discrete choice models, we estimate the effect of receiving the BDH on the probability that a person spends on education and health. In order to reduce the bias produced by the non-comparability of the data, we compare the results with PSM and without PSM between those who receive the transfer and those who do not. The results show that BDH beneficiaries spend less on health and education than those who do not. These results are consistent with the incorporation of a set of control variables related to the socioeconomic characteristics of the families. A possible policy implication based on our results is that the conditioned monetary transfer is not fulfilling the objectives of its creation. Consequently, social policies should guarantee that this type of programs are not an instrument of dependence that limits the capacities of people because this prevents the reduction of poverty and inequality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信