Jah王国:非殖民化时代的拉斯塔法里教徒、坦桑尼亚和泛非主义

IF 0.5 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES
Shamara Wyllie Alhassan
{"title":"Jah王国:非殖民化时代的拉斯塔法里教徒、坦桑尼亚和泛非主义","authors":"Shamara Wyllie Alhassan","doi":"10.1080/00064246.2021.1888850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using archival, ethnographic, and oral historical sources in her first full-length manuscript, Monique Bedasse writes a compelling intellectual and political history of Rastafari repatriation and Pan-Africanism during the post-independence period of the late twentieth century in the Caribbean, Africa, and Europe. Bedasse’s subjectivity as a child of Rastafari parents and her training as a historian gave her unique access “to fiercely protected Rastafarian archives” (xiii) and allowed her to write an interior historical narrative that merits the linguistic and philosophical contributions of Rastafari. More than a peripheral, millenarian, escapist, or solely cultural movement, Bedasse positions Rastafari as central to Black radical ideas and Pan-African anti-colonial politics in the Caribbean and Africa. The intellectual contributions of Rastafari people open avenues of inquiry beyond popular culture. “Rastafari dynamic and ever-poignant critiques of racism and capitalism throughout the 1970s and beyond have been concealed by the focus on Rastafari as popular culture” (188). Engaging Rastafari people and not simply cultural products reveals their centrality to the development of decolonial Pan-African ideas as policy. While this is the broad focus of Bedasse’s book, her interventions critiquing the masculine characterization of repatriation and her choice to foreground the disruptive narrative of a Rastafari woman’s memories illuminates the intersectional nature of repatriation. Bedasse’s book comprises six thematic chapters that tell interwoven histories between Jamaica, England, and Tanzania. Her choice showcases the intertwined nature of African and Diasporan histories. Bedasse leverages multiple written archives in at least five different countries and draws upon embodied archives of Rastafari people. In so doing, she reveals the extensive networks between global Black radicalism and Rastafari repatriates as she chooses to allow their oral histories to drive her methodological choices in the field and in writing. Bedasse begins her book outlining the conceptual notion of “trodding diaspora,” serving as a model for thinking through multi-sited ethnographies between Africa and the Diaspora. The Rastafari term “trod” means to travel physically or metaphysically. Bedasse theorizes movement in terms of the physical repatriation and the mental return to an imagined “Africa.” There are four overarching ideas of trodding diaspora: First, Bedasse likens “trodding” to the physical and spiritual movement that allows Rastafari to build Jah Kingdom beyond national boundaries and imagine freedom beyond achievement of political independence. Much of Rastafari Studies is preoccupiedwith Rastafari repatriation to the nation-state of Ethiopia; however, Bedasse underscores the political, spiritual, and social importance of repatriation to Tanzania. Second, Bedasse defies scholarly attempts to separate research on Africa from","PeriodicalId":45369,"journal":{"name":"BLACK SCHOLAR","volume":" ","pages":"75 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00064246.2021.1888850","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jah Kingdom: Rastafarians, Tanzania, and Pan-Africanism in the Age of Decolonization\",\"authors\":\"Shamara Wyllie Alhassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00064246.2021.1888850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using archival, ethnographic, and oral historical sources in her first full-length manuscript, Monique Bedasse writes a compelling intellectual and political history of Rastafari repatriation and Pan-Africanism during the post-independence period of the late twentieth century in the Caribbean, Africa, and Europe. Bedasse’s subjectivity as a child of Rastafari parents and her training as a historian gave her unique access “to fiercely protected Rastafarian archives” (xiii) and allowed her to write an interior historical narrative that merits the linguistic and philosophical contributions of Rastafari. More than a peripheral, millenarian, escapist, or solely cultural movement, Bedasse positions Rastafari as central to Black radical ideas and Pan-African anti-colonial politics in the Caribbean and Africa. The intellectual contributions of Rastafari people open avenues of inquiry beyond popular culture. “Rastafari dynamic and ever-poignant critiques of racism and capitalism throughout the 1970s and beyond have been concealed by the focus on Rastafari as popular culture” (188). Engaging Rastafari people and not simply cultural products reveals their centrality to the development of decolonial Pan-African ideas as policy. While this is the broad focus of Bedasse’s book, her interventions critiquing the masculine characterization of repatriation and her choice to foreground the disruptive narrative of a Rastafari woman’s memories illuminates the intersectional nature of repatriation. Bedasse’s book comprises six thematic chapters that tell interwoven histories between Jamaica, England, and Tanzania. Her choice showcases the intertwined nature of African and Diasporan histories. Bedasse leverages multiple written archives in at least five different countries and draws upon embodied archives of Rastafari people. In so doing, she reveals the extensive networks between global Black radicalism and Rastafari repatriates as she chooses to allow their oral histories to drive her methodological choices in the field and in writing. Bedasse begins her book outlining the conceptual notion of “trodding diaspora,” serving as a model for thinking through multi-sited ethnographies between Africa and the Diaspora. The Rastafari term “trod” means to travel physically or metaphysically. Bedasse theorizes movement in terms of the physical repatriation and the mental return to an imagined “Africa.” There are four overarching ideas of trodding diaspora: First, Bedasse likens “trodding” to the physical and spiritual movement that allows Rastafari to build Jah Kingdom beyond national boundaries and imagine freedom beyond achievement of political independence. Much of Rastafari Studies is preoccupiedwith Rastafari repatriation to the nation-state of Ethiopia; however, Bedasse underscores the political, spiritual, and social importance of repatriation to Tanzania. Second, Bedasse defies scholarly attempts to separate research on Africa from\",\"PeriodicalId\":45369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BLACK SCHOLAR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"75 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00064246.2021.1888850\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BLACK SCHOLAR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2021.1888850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK SCHOLAR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2021.1888850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

莫尼克·贝达斯(Monique Bedasse)在她的第一篇长篇手稿中利用档案、人种学和口述历史资料,撰写了一部引人注目的拉斯塔法里遣返和泛非主义的知识和政治历史,讲述了20世纪后期加勒比、非洲和欧洲独立后时期的拉斯塔法里遣返和泛非主义。作为拉斯塔法里派父母的孩子,贝达斯的主观性和她作为历史学家的训练,使她能够独特地接触到“受到严密保护的拉斯塔法里派档案”(xiii),并使她能够写出一篇内在的历史叙事,值得拉斯塔法里派在语言学和哲学上的贡献。不仅仅是一个边缘的,千禧年的,逃避现实的,或者纯粹的文化运动,贝达斯将拉斯塔法里派定位为黑人激进思想和加勒比海和非洲泛非反殖民政治的核心。拉斯塔法里教徒的智力贡献为超越流行文化的探索开辟了道路。“整个20世纪70年代及以后,拉斯塔法里对种族主义和资本主义的充满活力和不断尖锐的批评被拉斯塔法里作为流行文化的关注所掩盖”(188)。吸引拉斯塔法里人而不仅仅是文化产品,揭示了他们在非殖民化泛非思想作为政策发展中的中心地位。虽然这是贝达斯书的广泛焦点,但她对遣返的男性特征的批评,以及她选择突出拉斯塔法里女性记忆的破坏性叙述,说明了遣返的交叉性质。贝达斯的书由六个主题章节组成,讲述了牙买加、英国和坦桑尼亚之间相互交织的历史。她的选择展示了非洲和散居的历史交织在一起的本质。贝达斯利用了至少五个不同国家的多种书面档案,并利用了拉斯塔法里人的具体档案。在这样做的过程中,她揭示了全球黑人激进主义和拉斯塔法里遣返者之间的广泛网络,因为她选择让他们的口述历史推动她在该领域和写作中的方法论选择。贝达斯在书的开头概述了“旅居侨民”的概念,作为思考非洲和旅居侨民之间多地点民族志的模型。拉斯塔法里的术语“踏”意味着身体上或形而上的旅行。贝达斯将运动理论化为身体的回归和精神的回归到想象中的“非洲”。关于践踏侨民,有四个主要的观点:首先,贝达斯把“践踏”比作身体和精神上的运动,这种运动允许拉斯塔法里建立超越国界的上帝王国,想象超越政治独立的自由。大部分拉斯塔法里教派的研究都集中在拉斯塔法里教派被遣返回埃塞俄比亚这个民族国家;然而,贝达斯强调了遣返坦桑尼亚的政治、精神和社会重要性。其次,贝达斯反对将非洲研究与其他国家的研究分开的学术尝试
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jah Kingdom: Rastafarians, Tanzania, and Pan-Africanism in the Age of Decolonization
Using archival, ethnographic, and oral historical sources in her first full-length manuscript, Monique Bedasse writes a compelling intellectual and political history of Rastafari repatriation and Pan-Africanism during the post-independence period of the late twentieth century in the Caribbean, Africa, and Europe. Bedasse’s subjectivity as a child of Rastafari parents and her training as a historian gave her unique access “to fiercely protected Rastafarian archives” (xiii) and allowed her to write an interior historical narrative that merits the linguistic and philosophical contributions of Rastafari. More than a peripheral, millenarian, escapist, or solely cultural movement, Bedasse positions Rastafari as central to Black radical ideas and Pan-African anti-colonial politics in the Caribbean and Africa. The intellectual contributions of Rastafari people open avenues of inquiry beyond popular culture. “Rastafari dynamic and ever-poignant critiques of racism and capitalism throughout the 1970s and beyond have been concealed by the focus on Rastafari as popular culture” (188). Engaging Rastafari people and not simply cultural products reveals their centrality to the development of decolonial Pan-African ideas as policy. While this is the broad focus of Bedasse’s book, her interventions critiquing the masculine characterization of repatriation and her choice to foreground the disruptive narrative of a Rastafari woman’s memories illuminates the intersectional nature of repatriation. Bedasse’s book comprises six thematic chapters that tell interwoven histories between Jamaica, England, and Tanzania. Her choice showcases the intertwined nature of African and Diasporan histories. Bedasse leverages multiple written archives in at least five different countries and draws upon embodied archives of Rastafari people. In so doing, she reveals the extensive networks between global Black radicalism and Rastafari repatriates as she chooses to allow their oral histories to drive her methodological choices in the field and in writing. Bedasse begins her book outlining the conceptual notion of “trodding diaspora,” serving as a model for thinking through multi-sited ethnographies between Africa and the Diaspora. The Rastafari term “trod” means to travel physically or metaphysically. Bedasse theorizes movement in terms of the physical repatriation and the mental return to an imagined “Africa.” There are four overarching ideas of trodding diaspora: First, Bedasse likens “trodding” to the physical and spiritual movement that allows Rastafari to build Jah Kingdom beyond national boundaries and imagine freedom beyond achievement of political independence. Much of Rastafari Studies is preoccupiedwith Rastafari repatriation to the nation-state of Ethiopia; however, Bedasse underscores the political, spiritual, and social importance of repatriation to Tanzania. Second, Bedasse defies scholarly attempts to separate research on Africa from
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BLACK SCHOLAR
BLACK SCHOLAR ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Founded in 1969 and hailed by The New York Times as "a journal in which the writings of many of today"s finest black thinkers may be viewed," THE BLACK SCHOLAR has firmly established itself as the leading journal of black cultural and political thought in the United States. In its pages African American studies intellectuals, community activists, and national and international political leaders come to grips with basic issues confronting black America and Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信